A bid price equation for national forest timber sales in Western Arkansas and Southeasthern Oklahoma

Southern Journal of Applied Forestry

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 100-108

  Huebschmann, Michael M ^a   Lynch, Thomas B ^b   Lewis, David K ^b   Tilley, Daniel S ^b   Guldin, James M ^c  

^a Boise Cascade Corporation   (United States)

^b OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

Appraisal; Producer price index; Sawtimber; Shortleaf pine; Stumpage

Indexed keywords

COSTS; LUMBER; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SALES; SOFTWOODS; TIMBER;

BID PRICE EQUATION; PRODUCER PRICE INDEX;

LOGGING (FORESTRY);

BIDS; COSTS; EVALUATION; FORESTS; LOGGING; LUMBER; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PINUS ECHINATA; PINUS PALUSTRIS; PINUS RIGIDA; PRICES; PULP WOOD; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SALES; SAW LOGS; STUMPAGE;

PINUS ECHINATA;

EID: 4344612039     PISSN: 01484419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/sjaf/28.2.100     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Anderson, W.C. 1976. A method for appraising multiple-product sales of southern pine stumpage. USDA For. Serv. Res. Pap. SO-126. 9 p.
2. Bare, B.B., AND R.L. SMITH. 1999. Estimating stumpage values from transaction evidence using multiple regression. J. For. 97(7):32-39.
3. Bierman, H.S., and L. Fernandez. 1998. Game theory with economic applications. Addison-Weslsy, Reading, MA. 452 p.
4. Brannman, L., J. Buongiorno, and R. Fight. 1981. Quality adjusted price indices for Douglas-fir timber. West. J. Agric. Econ. 6(2):259-272.
5. Buongiorno, J., and T. Young. 1984. Statistical appraisal of timber with an application to the Chequamegon National Forest. North. J. Appl. For. 1(4):72-76.
6. Carter, D.R., and D.H. Newman. 1998. The impact of reserve prices in sealed bid federal timber sale auctions. For. Sci. 44(4):485-495.
7. Cubbage, F.W., Greene, W.D., and J.P. Lyon. 1989. Tree size and species, stand volume, and tract size: Effects on southern harvesting costs. South. J. Appl. For. 13(3):145-152.
8. Duerr, W. A. 1993. Introduction to forest resource economics. McGraw-Hill., Inc., New York, NY. 485 p.
9. Guttenberg, S. 1956. Influence of timber characteristics upon stumpage prices. USDA For. Serv. South. For. Exp. Sta. Occas. Pap. 146. 14 p.
10. Holmes, T.P., W.R. Bentley, S.H. Broderick, and T. Hobson. 1990. Hardwood stumpage price trends and characteristics in Connecticut. North. J. Appl. For. 7(1):13-16.
11. Huang, F.M., and J. Buongiorno. 1986. Market value of timber when some offerings are not sold: Implications for appraisal and demand analysis. For. Sci. 32(4):845-854.
12. Huebschmann, M.M. 2000. Restoring the shortleaf pine-bluestem grass ecosystem on the Ouachita National Forest: An economic evaluation. Ph.D. thesis, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma. 141 p.
13. Jackson, D.H., and A.G. McQuillan. 1979. A technique for estimating timber value based on tree size, management variables, and market conditions. For. Sci. 25(4):620-626.
14. Johnson, R.N. 1979. Oral auction versus sealed bids: An empirical investigation. Nat. Res. J. 19(1):315-335.
15. McGuirk, A.M., P. Driscoll, and J. Allwang. 1993. Misspecification testing: A comprehensive approach. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 75(4):1044-1055.
16. Munn, I.A., and R.B. Palmquist. 1997. Estimating hedonic price equations for a timber stumpage market using stochastic frontier estimation procedures. Can J. For. Res. 27(8):1276-1280.
17. Munn, I.A., AND R.R. Rucker. 1995. An economic analysis of the differences between bid prices on Forest Service and private timber sales. For. Sci. 41(4):823-840.
18. Nautiyal, J.C. 1982. Stumpage price function for hardwoods in the Niagara district of Ontario. Can. J. For. Res. 12(2):210-214.
19. Prescott, D.M., and G.D. Puttock. 1990. Hedonic price functions for multi-product timber sales in Southern Ontario. Can. J. Agric. Econ. 38(2):333-344.
20. Puttock, G.D., D.M. Prescott, and K.D. Mielke. 1990. Stumpage prices in southwestern Ontario: A hedonic function approach. For. Sci. 36(4):1119-1132.
21. Schuster, E.G., and M.J. Niccolucci. 1994. Sealed-bid versus oral-auction timber offerings: Implications of imperfect data. Can. J. For. Res. 24(1):87-91.
22. Steer, H.B. 1938. Stumpage prices of privately owned timber in the United States. USDA Tech. Bull. 626. 163 p.
23. US Department of Labor. 1999. PPI detailed report. Downloaded from Bureau of Labor Statistics website (146.142.4.24/cgi-bin/srgate).
24. Vargas, E.E., and D.F. Schreiner. 1999. Modeling monopsony market with regional CGE: The Oklahoma forest products industry case. Published online at www.agecon.okstate.edu/rcge/monopsony.PDF. 27 p.
25. Wiener, A.A. 1981. Appraising National Forest timber values: A concept revisited. J. For. 79(6):372-376.
26. Zivnuska, J.A. 1955. Supply, demand, and the lumber market. J. For. 53(8):547-553.