Effect of different seed proportion on yield of forage, seed and quality of annual legume and barley (Hordeum vulgare) mixture

Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Volumn 74, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 265-267

  Karadag, Yasar ^a   Buyukburc, Ugur ^a,b  

^a GAZIOSMANPASA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b HARRAN UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Crop productivity; Forage; Legume barley mixture; Quality

Indexed keywords

AVES; HORDEUM; HORDEUM VULGARE; HORDEUM VULGARE SUBSP. VULGARE; LATHYRUS; LATHYRUS SATIVUS; MELEAGRIS GALLOPAVO; VICIA; VICIA SATIVA; VICIA SATIVA SUBSP. NIGRA;

EID: 4344608109     PISSN: 00195022     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Al-Masri M R. 1998. Yield and nutritive value of vetch (Vicia sativa) barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) forage under different harvesting regimes. Tropical Grasslands 32 (3) : 201-26.
2. Altinok S and Hakyemez H B. 2002. The effects on forage yields of different mixture rates of hairy vetch (Vicia villosa L.) and narbonne vetch (Vicia narbonensis L.) seeded with barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Journal of Agriculture, Faculty of Ankara University 8 (1) : 45-50.
3. AOAC. 1984. Official Methods of Analysis of Association of Official Agricultural Chemists edn 13. Association of Official Agricultural Chemists, Washington, DC.
4. Buyukburc U. 1993. Effect of fertilizers and resting on the overgrazed Semi-Arid Ranges of Central Anatolian. (in) Proceedings of XVII International Grassland Congress, New Zealand-Australia, pp 62-4.
5. Gomez K A and Gomez A A. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research edn, 2, pp 137-86. Gomez K A and Gomez A A (Eds). John Wiley & Sons, Singapore.
6. Kokten K and Tansi V. 1999. Research on the possibilities of growing chickling mixtures with different cereals species under Cukurova conditions. (in) Proceedings of Turkey Field Crops Congress, held during 15-18 November, at Adana, pp 207-12.
7. Nelson C I and Volonec J J. 1995. Environmental and physiological aspects of forage management. (in) Forages, pp 55-70. Bames R F, Miller D A and Nelson C J (Eds). Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa.
8. Qamar I A, Keatinge J D H, Mohammed N, Ali A and Khan M A. 1999 a. Introduction and management of vetch/barley forage mixtures in the rainfed areas of Pakistan. I. Forage yield. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 50 (1) : 1-9.
9. Qamar I A, Keatinge J D H, Mohammed N, Ali A and Khan M A. 1999 b. Introduction and management of vetch/barley forage mixtures in the rainfed areas of Pakistan. II. Forage quality. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 50 (1) : 11-9.
10. Rauber R, Schmidtke K and Kimpel-Freund H. 2000. Konkurrenz und ertragsvorteile in gemengen aus erbsen (Pisum sativum L.) und hafer (Avena sativa L.). Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 185 : 33-47.
11. Soya H, Gulenc S, Avcioglu R and Geren H. 1999. Investigations on the effect of different harvest stages on the yield and yield characteristics of hairy vetch (Vicia villosa Roth.) and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) grown as winter second crop. (in) Proceedings of Turkey Field Crops Congress, held during 15-18 November, at Adana, pp 75-9.
12. Tukel T, Hasar E and Hatipoglu R. 1997. Effect of mixture rates and cutting dates on the forage yield and quality of vetch-triticale mixtures and their seed yields under lowland conditions of Cukurova. (in) Proceedings of XVIII International Grassland Congress, held during 8-19 June in Canada, pp 25-6.