Atomic force microscopy assisted immobilization of lipid vesicles

Langmuir

Volumn 20, Issue 17, 2004, Pages 7308-7312

  Schönherr, Holger ^a   Rozkiewicz, Dorota I ^a   Vancso, G Julius ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADSORPTION; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; ETHANOL; PROTEINS;

LIPID BILAYERS; LIPID VESICLES; VESICLE IMMOBILIZATION;

LIPIDS;

ADSORPTION; ETHANOL; LIPIDS; PROTEINS; SPECTROSCOPY;

DIMYRISTOYLPHOSPHATIDYLCHOLINE; GOLD;

ADSORPTION; ARTICLE; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; CHEMISTRY; LIPID BILAYER; METHODOLOGY; PARTICLE SIZE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOLUTION AND SOLUBILITY; SURFACE PROPERTY;

ADSORPTION; DIMYRISTOYLPHOSPHATIDYLCHOLINE; GOLD; LIPID BILAYERS; MICROSCOPY, ATOMIC FORCE; PARTICLE SIZE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOLUTIONS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 4344602098     PISSN: 07437463     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/la0498915     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. (a) Plant, A. L. Langmuir 1993, 9, 2764-2767.
2. (b) Sackmann, E. Science 1996, 271, 43-48.
3. (a) MoConnell, H. M.; Watts, T. H.; Weis, R. M.; Brian, A. A. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1986, 864, 95-106.
4. (b) Salafsky, J.; Groves, J. T.; Boxer, S. G. Biochemistry 1996, 35, 14773-14781.
5. (c) Grakoui, A.; Bromley, S. K.; Sumen, C.; Davis, M. M.; Shaw, A. S.; Allen, P. M.; Dustin, M. L. Science 1999, 255, 221-227.
6. (d) Wagner, M. L.; Tamm, L. K. Biophys. J. 2001, 81, 266-275.
7. (e) Cho, W. W.; Bittova, L.; Stahelin, R. V. Anal. Biochem. 2001, 296, 153-161.
8. (a) Watts, T. H.; Brian, A. A.; Kappler, J. W.; Marrack, P.; McConnell, H. M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1984, 81, 7564-7568.
9. (b) Watts, T. H.; Gaub, H. E.; McConnell, H. M. Nature 1986, 320, 179-181.
10. Cremer, P. S.; Boxer, S. G. J. Phys. Chem. B 1999, 103, 2554-2559.
11. Mou, J. X.; Yang, J.; Shao, Z. F. J. Mol. Biol. 1995, 248, 507-512.
12. (a) Williams, L. M.; Evans, S.D.; Flynn, T. M.; Marsh, A.; Knowles, P. F.; Bushby, R. J.; Boden, N. Supramol. Sci. 1997, 4, 513-517.
13. (b) Cheng, Y. L.; Boden, N.; Bushby, R. J.; Clarkson, S.; Evans, S. D.; Knowles, P. F.; Marsh, A.; Miles, R. E. Langmuir 1998, 14, 839-844.
14. Jenkins, A. T. A.; Boden, N.; Bushby, R.J.; Evans, S.D.; Knowles, P. F.; Miles, R. E.; Ogier, S. D.; Schönherr, H.; Vancso, G. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 5274-5280.
15. See e.g.: (a)Ringsdorf, H.; Schlarb, B.; Venzmer, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1988, 27, 113-158. (b) Beyer, D.; Elender, G.; Knoll, W.; Kuhner, M.; Maus, S.; Ringsdorf, H.; Sackmann, E. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1996, 35, 1682-1685. (c) Heibel, C.; Maus, S.; Knoll, W.; Rühe, J. ACS Symp. Ser. 1998, 695, 104-118.
16. See e.g.: (a)Ringsdorf, H.; Schlarb, B.; Venzmer, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1988, 27, 113-158. (b) Beyer, D.; Elender, G.; Knoll, W.; Kuhner, M.; Maus, S.; Ringsdorf, H.; Sackmann, E. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1996, 35, 1682-1685. (c) Heibel, C.; Maus, S.; Knoll, W.; Rühe, J. ACS Symp. Ser. 1998, 695, 104-118.
17. See e.g.: (a)Ringsdorf, H.; Schlarb, B.; Venzmer, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1988, 27, 113-158. (b) Beyer, D.; Elender, G.; Knoll, W.; Kuhner, M.; Maus, S.; Ringsdorf, H.; Sackmann, E. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1996, 35, 1682-1685. (c) Heibel, C.; Maus, S.; Knoll, W.; Rühe, J. ACS Symp. Ser. 1998, 695, 104-118.
18. van Oudenaarden, A.; Boxer, S. G. Science 1999, 285, 1046-1048.
19. For recent reviews, see: (a) Boxer, S. G. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2000,4, 704-709. (b) Groves, J. T.; Boxer, S. G. Acc. Chem. Res. 2002, 35, 149-157.
20. For recent reviews, see: (a) Boxer, S. G. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2000,4, 704-709. (b) Groves, J. T.; Boxer, S. G. Acc. Chem. Res. 2002, 35, 149-157.
21. Morigaki, K.; Baumgart, T.; Offenhausser, A.; Knoll, W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 172-174.
22. (a) Cremer, P. S.; Groves, J. T.; Kung, L. A.; Boxer, S. G. Langmuir 1999, 15, 3893-3896.
23. (b) Hovis, J. S.; Boxer, S. G. Langmuir 2000, 16, 894-897.
24. (c) Hovis, J. S.; Boxer, S. G. Langmuir 2001, 17, 3400-3405.
25. (a) Groves, J. T.; Ulman, N.; Boxer, S. G. Science 1997, 275, 651-653.
26. (b) Jenkins, A. T. A.; Bushby, R. J.; Evans, S. D.; Knoll, W.; Offenhausser, A.; Ogier, S. D. Langmuir 2002, 18, 3176-3180.
27. (c) Cremer, P. S.; Yang, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 8130-8131.
28. Yoshina-Ishii, C.; Boxer, S. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 3696-3697.
29. Svedhem, S.; Pfeiffer, I.; Larsson, C.; Wingren, C.; Borrebaeck, C.; Hook, F. ChemBioChem 2003, 4, 339-843.
30. Jung, L. S.; Shumaker-Parry, J. S.; Campbell, C. T.; Yee, S. S.; Gelb, M. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 4177-4184.
31. Stamou, D.; Duschl, C.; Delamarche, E.; Vogel, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 5580-5583.
32. Kim, J.-M.; Ji, E.-K.; Woo, S. M.; Lee, H. W.; Ahn, D. J. Adv. Mater. 2003, 15, 1118-1121.
33. (a) Boukobza, E.; Sonnenfeld, A.; Haran, G. J. Phys. Chem. B 2001, 105, 12165-12170.
34. (b) Stanish, I.; Santos, J. P.; Singh, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 1008-1009.
35. Schönherr, H.; Johnson, J. M.; Lenz, P.; Frank, C. W.; Boxer, S. G. Langmuir, submitted.
36. Morigaki, K.; Schönherr, H.; Frank, C. W.; Knoll, W. Langmuir 2003, 19, 6994-7002.
37. Tortonese, M.; Kirk, M. Proc. SPIE 1997, 3009, 53-60.
38. The halo appeared always in the horizontal direction, i.e., along the fast scan axis, independent of the scan angle utilized, while the imaged features rotated consistently.
39. (a) Egawa, H.; Furusawa, K. Langmuir 1999, 15, 1660-1666.
40. (b) Reviakine, I.; Brisson, A. Langmuir 2000, 16, 1806-1815.
41. (c) Kumar, S.; Hoh, J. H. Langmuir 2000, 16, 9936-9940.
42. (d) Pignataro, B.; Steinem, C.; Galla, H. J.; Fuchs, H.; Janshoff, A. Biophys. J. 2000, 78, 487-498.
43. A thickness of 4.2 nm was reported: Tokumasu, F.; Jin, A. J.; Feigenson, G. W.; Dvorak, J. A. Ultramicroscopy 2003, 97, 217-227.
44. See e.g.: Dufrene, Y. F.; Barger, W. R.; Green, J. B. D.; Lee, G. U. Langmuir 1997, 13, 4779-4784.
45. A value of ∼5.3 nm has been reported depending on temperature and hydration level: (a) Smith, G. S.; Sirotra, E. B.; Safinya, C. R.; Plano, R. J.; Clark, N. A. J. Chem. Phys. 1990, 92, 4519-4529. (b) Harroun, T. A.; Heller, W. T.; Weiss, T. M.; Yang, L.; Huang, H. W. Biophys. J. 1999, 76, 937-945.
46. A value of ∼5.3 nm has been reported depending on temperature and hydration level: (a) Smith, G. S.; Sirotra, E. B.; Safinya, C. R.; Plano, R. J.; Clark, N. A. J. Chem. Phys. 1990, 92, 4519-4529. (b) Harroun, T. A.; Heller, W. T.; Weiss, T. M.; Yang, L.; Huang, H. W. Biophys. J. 1999, 76, 937-945.
47. Scanning with forces above this threshold force causes noticeable disruption of the bilayer in large area scans.
48. (a) Xu, S.; Liu, G.-Y. Langmuir 1997, 13, 127-129.
49. (b) Liu, G. Y.; Xu, S.; Qian, Y. L. Acc. Chem. Res. 2000, 33, 457-466.
50. Keller, C. A.; Glasmastar, K.; Zhdanov, V. P.; Kasemo, B. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2000, 84, 5443-5446.
51. Jass, J.; Tjärnhage, T.; Puu, G. Biophys. J. 2000, 79, 3153-3163.
52. Seifert, U. Adv. Phys. 1997, 46, 13-137.
53. 1/3).
54. 1/3).
55. The width of the vesicle adsorbed on the bilayer (ref 20) is 1-2 orders of magnitude larger than the diameter of the contact area estimate for an elastic contact, which does not lead to bilayer damage.
56. We have successfully performed these experiments with egg PC vesicles using the same protocols as described herein.