Computer-aided identification of the yield curve of a sheet metal after onset of necking

Computational Materials Science

Volumn 31, Issue 1-2, 2004, Pages 155-168

  Koc, Pino ^a   Štok, Boris ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LJUBLJANA   (Slovenia)

Author keywords

Finite element method; Inverse identification; Sheet metal; Tensile test; Yield curve

Indexed keywords

BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; COMPUTER AIDED ANALYSIS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; NUCLEATION; OPTIMIZATION; STAINLESS STEEL; STRAIN; TENSILE TESTING;

INVERSE IDENTIFICATION; MATERIAL PROPERTIES; STRAIN DISTRIBUTIONS; YIELD CURVE;

SHEET METAL;

EID: 4344590197     PISSN: 09270256     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2004.02.004     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. D. Banabic, W. Müler, K. Pöhlandt, Determination of yield loci from cross tensile tests assuming various kinds of yield criteria, in: Proceedings of the 20th IDDRG Biennial Congress, Brussels, Belgium, June 1998, pp. 343-349.
2. F.F. Damborg, et al., Application of ductile fracture criteria to bending under tension, in: proceedings of the 20th IDDRG Biennial Congress, Brussels, Belgium, June 1998, pp. 145-155.
3. E. Doege, T. Hallfeldt, S. Kulp, Characteristic values and testing methods for deep drawing processes, in: B. Shirvani, et al. (Eds.), Sheet Metal 2000, Proceedings of the 8th International Conference, April 2000, pp. 3-18.
4. J. Gerlach, L. Keßler, Material parameters for the FEM-simulation - impact of advanced material models on forming and part properties, in: K. Kuzman, et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the IDDRG 2003 Conference, Bled, Slovenia, May 2003, pp. 97-107.
5. A.M. Goijaerts, L.E. Govaert, F.P.T. Baaijens, Prediction of ductile fracture in metal blanking, in: M. Geiger, et al. (Eds.), Sheet Metal 1999, Proceedings of the International Conference, September 1999, pp. 465-472.
6. Knockaert R., Chastel Y., Massoni E. Experimental and numerical determination of texture evolution during deep drawing tests. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 110:2001;300-311.
7. European Standard EN 10 002-1: Metallic materials - Tensile testing, Part 1: Method of test at ambient temperature, European Committee for Standardization, 1990.
8. V.V. Toropov, F. Yoshida, E. Van der Giessen, Material parameter identification for large deformation plasticity models, in: H. Sol, C.W.J. Oomens (Eds.), Proceedings of the Euromech Colloquium held in Kerkrade, The Netherlands, April 1997, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1997, pp. 81-92.
9. Gavrus A., Massoni E., Chenot J.L. An inverse analysis using a finite element model for identification of rheological parameters. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 60:1996;447-454.
10. Gusek C.O., Bleck W., Dahl W. Modelling of sheet metal testing. Computational Materials Science. 7:1996;173-180.
11. R. Hambli, D. Badie-Levet, FEM characterization of damage law parameters by inverse technique, in: B. Shirvani, et al. (Eds.), Sheet Metal 2000, Proceedings of the 8th International Conference, April 2000, pp. 511-518.
12. Yuan H., et al. Investigations of size effects in tensile test based on a nonlocal micro-mechanical damage model. Computational Materials Science. 26:2003;230-243.
13. Beck J.V., Arnold K.J. Parameter Estimation in Engineering and Science. 1977;John Wiley & Sons Inc. New York.
14. Štok B., Koc P. Computer aided identification of the temperature dependence of material properties. Metals Alloys Technologies. 30(1-2):1996;15-19.
15. Arora J.S. Introduction to Optimum Design. 1989;McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.
16. ABAQUS/Standard, Version 6.3, Hibbit, Karlsson & Sorensen, Inc., Pawtucket, RI, USA, 2002.