The rest of the story: Socioculturel patterns of story elaboration

Poetics

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 21-45

  Cerulo, Karen A ^a,b  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Active audience; Media; Narrative; Story elaboration; Textual interpretation

Indexed keywords

EID: 4344588661     PISSN: 0304422X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-422X(00)00011-5     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Allport, G.W. and L.J. Postman, 1947. The psychology of rumor. New York: Holt.
2. Ang, I., 1985. Watching Dallas. London: Methuen.
3. Baran, S.J. and D.K. Davis, 2000. Mass communication theory: Foundations, ferment, and future 2nd edit. Scarborough, Ontario: Wadsworth.
4. Barthes, R., 1982. Image-music-text. Trans, by S. Heath. New York: Hill and Wang.
5. Bartlett, Sir F.S., 1932. Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge: The University Press.
6. Bittner, J.R., 1996. Mass communication 6th edit. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
7. Bobo, J., 1988. The color purple': Black women as cultural readers. In: E.D. Pribram (ed.), Female spectators, 90-109. London: Verso.
8. Carey, J.W., 1988. Media, myth, and narratives. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
9. Cerulo, K.A., 1988. What's wrong with this picture?: Enhancing communication effectiveness through syntactic and semantic distortion. Communication Research 15(1), 93-101.
10. Cerulo, K.A., 1995. Designs on the White House: Television ads, message structure, and election outcome. Research in Political Sociology 7, 63-88.
11. Cerulo, K.A., 1998. Deciphering violence: The cognitive structure of right and wrong. New York: Routledge.
12. Clayman, S.E., 1995. Defining moments, presidential debates, and the dynamics of quotability. Journal of Communication 45 (Summer), 118-146.
13. Corner, J., 1996. Reappraising reception: Aims, concepts, and methods. In: J. Curran and M. Gurevitch (eds.), Mass media and society, 225-242. London: Arnold.
14. Corner, J., K. Richardson and N. Fenton, 1990. Nuclear reactions: Form and response in public issue television. London: Libbey.
15. Croteau, D. and W. Hoynes, 2000. Media/society: Industries, images, and audiences, 2nd edit. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
16. DeFleur, M. and S. Ball-Rokeach. 1982. Theories of mass communication. 4th edit. New York: Longman.
17. Fiske, J. and J. Hartley, 1978. Reading television. London: Methuen.
18. Gadamer, H.G., 1975. Truth and method. New York: Continuum.
19. General social survey, 1996. 〈http://www.icprs.umich.edu/GSS/ codebook/chldidel.htm〉, released June 18, 1996.
20. Griffin, M., 1992. Looking at tv news: Strategies for research. Communication 13(2), 121-141.
21. Halley, J.A., 1996. Origins and novelty: Avant-gardes and their reception. Current Perspectives in Sociological Theory, 16, 221-236.
22. Harrington, H.F. and E. Harrington, 1929. Writing for print. Boston, MA: Heath.
23. Hunt, D.M. 1997, Screening the Los Angeles 'Riots': Race, seeing and resistance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
24. Iser, W., 1978. The art of reading. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.
25. Jamieson, K.H., 1986. The evolution of political advertising in America. In: L.L. Kaid, D. Nimmo and K.R. Sanders (eds.), New perspectives on political advertising, 1-20. Carbondale, IL: Southerm Illinois University Press.
26. Jensen, K., 1986. Making sense of the news. Aarhus: The University Press.
27. Liebes, T. and E. Katz, 1990. The export of meaning: Cross cultural readings of Dallas. New York: Oxford University Press.
28. Lindlof, T.R. and A. Grubb-Swetnam, 1996. Seeking a path of greater resistance: The self becoming method. In: D. Grodin and T. R. Lindlof (eds.). Constructing the self in a mediated world, 179-205. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.
29. Livingstone, S. and P. Lunt, 1994. Talk on television. London: Routledge.
30. Long, E., 1986. Women, reading, and cultural authority: Some implications of the audience perspective in cultural studies. American Quarterly 38, 591-612.
31. Lull, J., 1988. World families watch television. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
32. Maffesoli, M., 1996. The time of the tribes: The decline of individualism in mass society, (D. Smith, trans.). London: Sage.
33. Morgan, D.L., 1988. Focus groups as qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
34. Morley, D., 1980. The nationwide audience. London: British Film Institute.
35. Morley, D., 1992. Television, audiences, and cultural studies. London: Routledge.
36. Press, A., 1991. Women watching television: Gender, class, and generation in the american television experience. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
37. Radway, J., 1984. Reading the romance. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
38. Scheuer, J., 1995. The television thing. Dissent 42 (Summer), 299-301.
39. Schlesinger, P., R.E. Dobash, R. P. Dobash and C. Weaver, 1992. Women viewing violence. London: British Film Institute.
40. Schudson, M., 1978. Discovering the news. New York: Basic.
41. Shibutani, T., 1966. Improvised news: A social study of rumor. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
42. Steiner, L., 1988. Oppositional recoding as an act of resistance. Critical Studies in Mass Communication 5(1), 1-15.
43. Trejo Delarbe, R., 1994. Videopolitics vs. mediocracy? The media and the democratic culture. Revista Mexicana de Sociologia 51: 211-255.