On two modes of apprehension

Ecological Psychology

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 37-44

  Runeson, Sverker ^a   Andersson, Isabell E K ^a  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4344588379     PISSN: 10407413     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15326969eco1601_5     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Andersson, I. E. K., Kreegipuu, K., & Runeson, S. (2001, June). An electrophysiological correlate to the distinction between a direct-perceptual and an inferential mode of apprehension. Poster presented at the 11th International Conference on Perception and Action, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
2. Andersson, I. E. K., & Runeson, S. (2004). Realism of confidence as an indicator of mode of apprehension. Manuscript in preparation, Department of Psychology, Uppsala University, Sweden.
3. Baron, R. M. (1981). Social knowing from an ecological-event perspective: A consideration of the relative domains of power for cognitive and perceptual modes of knowing. In J. H. Harvey (Ed.), Cognition, social behavior, and the environment (pp. 61-89). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
4. Brunswik, E. (1966). Reasoning as a universal behavior model and a functional differentiation between "perception" and "thinking." In K. R. Hammond (Ed.), The psychology of Egon Brunswik (pp. 487-494). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
5. Fowler, C. A., & Turvey, M. T. (1978). Skill acquisition: An event approach with special reference to searching for the optimum of a function of several variables. In O. Stelmach (Ed.), Information processing in motor control and learning (pp. 1-40). New York: Academic.
6. Gilden, D. L., & Proffitt, D. R. (1989). Understanding collision dynamics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 372-383.
7. Heft, H. (1993). A methodological note on overestimates of reaching distance: Distinguishing between perceptual and analytical judgments. Ecological Psychology, 5, 255-271.
8. Jacobs, D. M. (2001). Perception, action, and learning: Toward an ecological approach anchored inflexibility. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Digital Printing Partners.
9. Jacobs, D. M., Michaels, C. F., & Runeson, S. (2000). Learning to perceive the relative mass of colliding balls: The effects of ratio-scaling and feedback. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 1332-1340.
10. Jacobs, D. M., Michaels, C. F., Zaal, F. T. J. M., & Runeson, S. (2001a). Developing expertise: Mode transitions or mere change in variable use? In D. M. Jacobs (Ed.), On perceiving, acting, and learning: Toward an ecological approach anchored in convergence (pp. 127-143). Amsterdam: Free University.
11. Jacobs, D. M., Michaels, C. F., Zaal, F. T. J. M., & Runeson, S. (2001b). Developing expertise: Mode transitions or mere change in variable use? In G. Burton & R. Schmidt (Eds.), Studies in perception and action VI: Eleventh International Conference on Perception and Action (pp. 181-184). Mawah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
12. Jacobs, D. M., Runeson, S., & Michaels, C. F. (2001). Learning to visually perceive the relative mass of colliding balls in globally and locally constrained task ecologies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 1019-1038.
13. James, W. (1950). The principles of psychology (Vols. 1-2). New York: Dover. (Original work published 1890)
14. Juslin, P., & Olsson, H. (1997). Thurstonian and Brunswikian origins of uncertainty in judgment: A sampling model of confidence in sensory discrimination. Psychological Review, 104, 344-366.
15. Juslin, P., Winman, A., & Olsson, H. (2000). Naive empiricism and dogmatism in confidence research: A critical examination of the hard-easy effect. Psychological Review, 107, 384-396.
16. Kreegipuu, K., & Runeson, S. (1999). Becoming competent through the perceiver's eye. In M. A. Orealy & J. A. Thomson (Eds.), Studies in perception and action V: Tenth International Conference on Perception and Action (pp. 20-23). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
17. Kreegipuu, K., & Runeson, S. (2004). The subjective aspect of achieving perceptual competence. Manuscript in preparation, Department of Psychology, Tartu University, Estonia.
18. Michaels, C. F., & Beek, P. J. (1995) The state of ecological psychology. Ecological Psychology, 7, 259-278.
19. Michaels, C. F., & Vries, M. de (1998). Higher-order and lower-order variables in the visual perception of relative pulling force. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 526-546.
20. Michotte, A. (1991). Perception and cognition (A. Costall, G. Butterworth, & G. Thines, Trans.). In G. Thinès, A. Costall, & G. Butterworth (Eds.), Michotte's experimental phenomenology of perception (pp. 224-226). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. (Original work published 1955)
21. Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. New York: Doubleday.
22. Runeson, S. (1995). Support for the cue-heuristic model is based on suboptimal observer performance: Response to Gilden & Proffitt (1994). Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 1262-1273.
23. Runeson, S., & Andersson, I. E. K. (2004). Achievement of invariant usage with true and false feedback in learning a visual relative-mass discrimination task. Manuscript submitted for publication, Department of Psychology, Uppsala University, Sweden.
24. Runeson, S., Juslin, P., & Olsson, H. (2000). Visual perception of dynamic properties: Cue heuristics versus direct-perceptual competence. Psychological Review, 107, 525-555.
25. Runeson, S., & Vedeler, D. (1993). The indispensability of precollision kinematics in the visual perception of relative mass. Perception & Psychophysics, 53, 617-632.
26. Ryan, T. A. (1938). Dynamic, physiognomic, and other neglected properties of perceived objects: A new approach to comprehending. American Journal of Psychology, 51, 629-649.
27. Turvey, M. T. (1990). Coordination. American Psychologist, 45, 938-953.