The limits of international adjudication in International Environmental Law: Another perspective on the Southern Bluefin Tuna case

International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 177-197

  Stephens, Tim ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFLICT MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL LEGISLATION; FISHERY MANAGEMENT; NATURE CONSERVATION; TUNA FISHERY;

SCOMBRIDAE GEN. SP.; THUNNUS MACCOYII; THUNNUS THYNNUS;

EID: 4344571684     PISSN: 09273522     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1163/1571808041220083     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. D. Horowitz, "The Catch of Poseidon's Trident: The Fate of High Seas Fisheries in the Southern Bluefin Tuna Case", (2001) 25 Melbourne University Law Review 810-830;
2. C. Romano, "The Southern Bluefin Tuna Dispute: Hints of a World to Come ... Like It or Not", (2001) 32 Ocean Development and International Law 313-348;
3. T. Stephens, "A Paper Umbrella Which Dissolves in the Rain? Implications of the Southern Bluefin Tuna Case for the Compulsory Resolution of Disputes Concerning the Marine Environment", (2001) 6 Asia Pacific Journal of Environmental Law 297-318;
4. M. Hayashi, "The Southern Bluefin Tuna Cases: Prescription of Provisional Measures by the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea", (2000) 13 Tulane Environmental Law Journal 361-385;
5. S. Marr, "The Southern Bluefin Tuna Cases: The Precautionary Approach and Conservation and Management of Fish Resources", (2000) 11 European Journal of International Law 815-831.
6. D.R. Rothwell and T. Stephens, "Dispute Resolution and the Law of the Sea: Reconciling the Interaction between the Law of the Sea Convention and Environmental Instruments" in A. Oude-Elferink and D.R. Rothwell (eds.), Oceans Management in the Twenty-First Century: Institutional Frameworks and Responses under the Law of the Sea Convention (The Hague, Kluwer Law International) (in press).
7. J. Peel, "A Paper Umbrella Which Dissolves in the Rain? The Future for Resolving Fisheries Disputes Under UNCLOS in the Aftermath of the Southern Bluefin Tuna Arbitration", (2002) 3 Melbourne Journal of International Law 53.
8. D.A. Colson and P. Hoyle, "Satisfying the Procedural Prerequisites to the Compulsory Dispute Settlement Mechanisms of the 1982 Law of the Sea Convention: Did the Southern Bluefin Tuna Tribunal Get it Right?", (2003) 34 Ocean Development and International Law 59-82.
9. www.pca-cpa.org (29 July 2003).
10. www.itlos.org (18 January 2004).
11. A. Bergin and M. Haward, "Southern Bluefin Tuna Fishery: Recent Developments in International Management", (1994) 18 Marine Policy 3, 263, 271.
12. Commission for the Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna, Report of the Extended Scientific Committee for the Eighth Meeting of the Scientific Committee, 1-4 September 2003, Christchurch, Attachment D. Available at www.ccsbt.org (10 December 2003).
13. http://www.iucnredlist.org/search/details.php?species=21858 (26 January 2004).
14. J. Balrock, "Determining the Fate of Southern Bluefin Tuna-International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (1999) New Zealand v Japan; Australia v Japan", (2000) 17 Environmental and Planning Law Journal 2, 157.
15. A. Fabra, "The LOSC and the Implementation of the Precautionary Principle", (1999) 10 Yearbook of International Environmental Law 15;
16. D. Freestone, "Caution or Precaution: 'A Rose By Any Other Name ... ?'", (1999) 10 Yearbook of International Environmental Law 15,
17. Commission for Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna, Report of the Special Meeting, 16-18 November 2000, Canberra, para. 32.
18. www.ccsbt.org (9 December 2003).
19. Commission for Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna, Report of the Sixth Annual Meeting: First Part, 29-30 November 1999, Canberra, paras. 35-37. Available at www.ccsbt.org (9 December 2003).
20. W. Tuckey, Minister for Forestry and Conservation, 29 May 2001, http:// www.affa.gov.au/ministers/tuckey/releases/01/01tu.html (10 December 2003).
21. M. Millett, "No More Fish in the Sea", Sydney Morning Herald, 25 October 2001, p. 16.
22. D.M. Johnston, "Fishery Diplomacy and Science and the Judicial Function", (1999) 10 Yearbook of International Environmental Law 33, 38.
23. J. Peel, "A Paper Umbrella Which Dissolves in the Rain? The Future for Resolving Fisheries Disputes under UNCLOS in the Aftermath of the Southern Bluefin Tuna Arbitration", (2002) 3 Melbourne Journal of International Law 53, 74.
24. B. Mansfield, "Letter to the Editor: The Southern Bluefin Tuna Arbitration: Comments on Professor Barbara Kwiakowska's Article", (2001) 16 International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 361;
25. M. Koskenniemi, "Peaceful Settlement of Environmental Disputes", (1991) 60 Nordic Journal of International Law 73, 78.
26. K. Abbott, R. Keohane, A. Moravcsik, A.-M. Slaughter and D. Snidal, "The Concept of Legalization", (2002) 54 International Organization 3, 401-419.
27. M. Brus, Third Party Dispute Settlement in an Interdependent World (Dordrecht, Martinus Nijhoff, 1995), p. 40.
28. P. Sands, Principles of International Environmental Law (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2nd ed., 2003), pp. 171-288.
29. A.O. Adede, "Management of Environmental Disputes: Avoidance Versus Settlement" in W. Laing (ed.), Sustainable Development and International Law (London, Graham and Trotman, 1995), pp. 115-124, at p. 117.
30. R. Bilder, "The Settlement of Disputes in the Field of the International Law of the Environment", (1975) 144 Recueil des Cours 141, 155.
31. T. Stephens, "The Right to Information on Consular Assistance under the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations: A Right for What Purpose? The LaGrand Case", (2002) 3 Melbourne Journal of International Law 143, 157-161.
32. R. Higgins, "Policy Considerations and the International Judicial Process", (1968) 17 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 58).
33. L.D.M. Nelson, "The Development of the Legal Regime of High Seas Fisheries" in A. Boyle and D. Freestone (eds.), International Law and Sustainable Development: Past Achievements and Future Challenges (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1999), pp. 113-134 at 132-133.
34. S.V. Scott, "The Contribution of the LOS Convention Organizations to its Harmonious Implementation" in A. Oude-Elferink and D.R. Rothwell (eds.), Oceans Management in the Twenty-First Century: Institutional Frameworks and Responses under the Law of the Sea Convention (The Hague, Kluwer Law International) (in press).
35. C. Chinkin, "Dispute Resolution and the Law of the Sea: Regional Problems and Prospects" in J. Crawford and D.R. Rothwell (eds.), The Law of the Sea in the Asian Pacific Region (Dordrecht, Martinus Nijhoff, 1995), pp. 237-262, at 245.
36. K. McCallion and H. Sharma, "Environmental Justice Without Borders: the Need for an International Court of the Environment to Protect Fundamental Environmental Rights", (2000) 32 George Washington Journal of International Law and Economics 351;
37. S.D. Murphy, "Does the World Need a New International Environmental Court?", (2000) 32 George Washington Journal of International Law and Economics 333;
38. A. Rest, "An International Court for the Environment: The Role of the Permanent Court of Arbitration", (1999) 4 Asia Pacific Journal of Environmental Law 2, 107;
39. A. Postiglione, "A More Efficient International Law on the Environment and Setting Up an International Court for the Environment within the United Nations", (1990) 20 Environmental Law 312;
40. A. Rest, "Need for an International Court for the Environment? Underdeveloped Legal Protection of the Individual in Transnational Litigation", (1994) 24 Environmental Policy and Law 173.
41. http://www.xcom.it/icef/statute.html.
42. P. Kalas, "International Environmental Dispute Resolution and the Need for Access by Non-State Entities", (2001) 12 Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law and Policy 191 at 232 ff.
43. E. Hey, Reflections on an International Environmental Court (The Hague, Kluwer Law International, 2000)
44. R. Jennings, "Need for an Environmental Court?", (1997) 22 Environmental Policy and Law 312.