The storied nature of agriculture and evaluation: A conversation

Agriculture and Human Values

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 267-276

  Lincoln, Yvonna S ^a   Thorp, Laurie G ^b   Russon, Craig ^c  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c W K KELLOGG FOUNDATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Agricultural evaluation; Inquiry paradigms; Local food systems; Narrative; Participatory inquiry; Social change; Story

Indexed keywords

EID: 4344559589     PISSN: 0889048X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1026197908214     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Berry, W. (2000)." A conversation with Wendell Berry." Image 26: 45-56.
2. Brody, H. (1994). "'My story is broken; can you help me fix it?' Medical ethics and the joint construction of narrative." Literature and Medicine 13(1): 79-92.
3. Bruner, J. (1991). "The narrative construction of reality." Critical Inquiry 18: 1-21.
4. Crites, S. (1971)." The narrative quality of experience." Journal of the American Academy of Religion 39: 291-311.
5. Denzin, Norman K. (2002) "Performing evaluation." In K. E. Ryan and T. A. Schwandt (eds.), Exploring Evaluator Role and Identity (pp. 139-165). Greenwich, Connecticut: Information Age Publishing.
6. Esteva, G. (1994). "Re-embedding food in agriculture." Culture and Agriculture 48: 2-13.
7. Frank, A. (1995). The Wounded Storyteller. Chicago: Harvard University Press.
8. Greenwood, D. and M. Levin (2000). "Reconstructing the relationships between universities and society through action research." In N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research. Newbury Park, California: Sage.
9. Guba, F. and Y. Lincoln (1981). Effective Evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10. Guba, E. and Y. Lincoln. (1989). Fourth Generation Evaluation. Newbury Park, California: Sage.
11. Harding, S (1987). Sex and Scientific Inquiry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12. Horton, Douglas (1998). "Disciplinary roots and branches of evaluation: Some lessons from agricultural research." Knowledge and Policy 10(4): 31-188.
13. Lather, P. (1993). "Fertile obsession: Validity after poststructuralism." The Sociological Quarterly 34(4): 673-694.
14. Lather, P. (1986). "Issues of validity in openly ideological research: Between a rock and a soft place." Interchange 17(4): 63-84.
15. LeCompte, M. (1993). "A framework for hearing silence: What does telling stories mean when we are supposed to be doing science?" In McLaughlin and Tierney (eds.), Naming Silenced Lives. Personal Narratives and the Process of Educational Change (pp. 9-28). New York: Routledge.
16. Lincoln, Y. and E. Guba (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, California: Sage.
17. Mackay, R. and D. Horton (2002). Expanding the Use of Impact Assessment and Evaluation in Agricultural Research and Development. Paper presented at the International Conference on Impacts of Agricultural Research and Development, San Jose, Costa Rice, February 4-7.
18. Stake, R. (1978). "The case study method in social inquiry." Educational Researcher 7(2): 5-8.
19. Whyte, H. (1981). "The value of narrativity in the representation of reality." In W. J. T. Mitchell (ed.), On Narrative (pp. 1-23). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.