Interoperability with Moby 1.0 - It's better than sharing your toothbrush!

Briefings in Bioinformatics

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 220-231

  Wilkinson, Mark D ^a   Senger, Martin ^b   Kawas, Edward ^b   Bruskiewich, Richard ^b   Gouzy, Jerome ^b   Noirot, Celine ^b   Bardou, Philippe ^b   Ng, Ambrose ^b   Haase, Dirk ^b   Saiz, Enrique de Andres ^b   Wang, Dennis ^b   Gibbons, Frank ^b   Gordon, Paul M K ^b   Sensen, Christoph W ^b   Carrasco, Jose Manuel Rodriguez ^b   Fernández, José M ^b   Shen, Lixin ^b   Links, Matthew ^b   Ng, Michael ^b   pushneva, Nina ^b   Neerincx, Pieter B T ^b   Leunissen, Jack A M ^b   Ernst, Rebecca ^b   Twigger, Simon ^b   Usadel, Bjorn ^b   Good, Benjamin ^b   Wong, Yan ^b   Stein, Lincoln ^b   Crosby, William ^b   Karlsson, Johan ^b   Royo, Romina ^b   Párraga, Iván ^b   Ramírez, Sergio ^b   Gelpi, Josep Lluis ^b   Trelles, Oswaldo ^b   Pisano, David G ^b   Jimenez, Natalia ^b   Kerhornou, Arnaud ^b   Rosset, Roman ^b   Zamacola, Leire ^b   Tarraga, Joaquin ^b   Huerta Cepas, Jaime ^b   Carazo, Jose María ^b   Dopazo, Joaquin ^b   Guigo, Roderic ^b   Navarro, Arcadi ^b   Orozco, Modesto ^b   Valencia, Alfonso ^b   Claros, M Gonzalo ^b   Pérez, Antonio J ^b   Aldana, Jose ^b   Rojano, M Mar ^b   Fernandez Santa Cruz, Raul ^b   Navas, Ismael ^b   Schiltz, Gary ^b   Farmer, Andrew ^b   Gessler, Damian ^b   Schoof, Heiko ^b   Groscurth, Andreas ^b   more..

^a ST PAUL S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Biomoby; Data integration; Interoperability; Schema; Semantic web; Web services

Indexed keywords

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; APPLICATION SERVICE PROVIDER; ARABIDOPSIS; ARTICLE; BIOINFORMATICS; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER LANGUAGE; COMPUTER MODEL; DATA ANALYSIS SOFTWARE; INTERNET; ONLINE SYSTEM; STANDARDIZATION;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; DATABASES, FACTUAL; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; INTERNET; PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES; SYSTEMS INTEGRATION;

EID: 43349101291     PISSN: 14675463     EISSN: 14774054     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbn003     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Stein L. Creating a bionformatics nation. Nature 2002;417: 119-20.
2. Pearson, H. Biology's Name Game. Nature 2001;411:631-2.
3. Wilkinson MD, Links M. BioMOBY: An open-source biological web services proposal. Brief Bioinform 2002;3: 331-41.
4. Wilkinson MD, Gessler D, Farmer A, et al. The BioMOBY project explores open-source, simple, extensible protocols for enabling biological database interoperability. Proc Virt Conf Genom and Bioinf 2003;3: 16-26.
5. Wilkinson M. BioMOBY: The MOBY-S platform for interoperable data service provision. In: Richard P. Grant (ed.). Computational Genomics. Wymondham: Horizon Bioscience, 2004.
6. The World Wide Web Consortium. Web Services Activity. http://www.w3.org/2002/ws (14 March 2007, date last accesed).
7. The World Wide Web Consortium. Web Services Description Language (WSDL) 1.1. http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl (14 March 2007, date last accessed).
8. The World Wide Web Consortium. Semantic Annotations for Web Services Description Language Working Group. http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl (14 March 2007, date last accessed).
9. Narayanan S, McIlraith SA. Simulation, verification and automated composition of web services. Proceedings of the 11th international conference on World Wide Web 2002; doi/10.1145/511446.511457.
10. Wu D, Sirin E, Hendler J, et al. Automatic Web Services Composition Using SHOP2. In: Proceedings of the World Wide Web Conference 2003. http://www2003.org/cdrom/papers/poster/p226/ p226-wu.html (14 March 2007, date last accessed).
11. Korhonen J, Pajunen L, Puustjarvi J. Automatic composition of Web service workflows using a semantic agent. In: Proceedings IEEE/WIC International Conference on Web Intelligence 13-17 October 2003, pp. 566-9. doi/10.1109/wi.2003.1241269.
12. Gekas J, Fasli M. Automatic Web Service Composition Using Web Connectivity Analysis Techniques. W3C Workshop on Frameworks for Semantics in Web Services 2005 Position Paper, 2005; http://www.w3.org/2005/04/FSWS/Submissions/39/web_service_composition.pdf (14 March 2007, date last accessed).
13. Carman MJ, Knoblock CA. Inducing Source Descriptions for Automated Web Service Composition. 2005. http://www.isi.edu/integration/papers/ carman05-wswkshp.pdf (14 March 2007, date last accessed).
14. Thakkar S, Ambite L, Knoblock A. Composing, optimizing, and executing plans for bioinformatics web services. VLDB J 2005;14 330-53. doi/10.1007/s00778-005-0158-4.
15. The World Wide Web Consortium. Extensible Markup Language. Available http://www.w3.org/XML (14 March 2007, date last accessed).
16. Seibel PN, Krüger J, Hartmeier S, et al. XML schemas for common bioinformatic data types and their application in workflow systems. BMC Bioinformatics 2006;7:490. doi/ 10.1186/1471-2105-7-490.
17. Kawas E, Senger M, Wilkinson M. BioMoby extensions to the Taverna workflow management and enactment software. BMC Bioinformatics 2006;7:523. doi/10.1186/1471-2105-7-523.
18. Lord P, Bechhofer S, Wilkinson MD, et al. Applying semantic web services to bioinformatics: Experiences gained, lessons learnt. Lect Notes Comput Sci 2004;3298:350-64.
19. Good B, Wilkinson MD. The life sciences semantic web is full of creeps! Brief Bioinform 2006;7:275-86.
20. Wilkinson MD. Gbrowse Moby: A web-based browser for BioMOBY Services. SCFBM 2006;1:4. doi/10.1186/1751-0473-1-4.
21. Wilkinson MD, Schoof H, Ernst R, et al. BioMOBY successfully integrates distributed heterogeneous bioinformatics Web Services. The PlaNet exemplar case. Plant Physiol 2002;138:5-17. doi/ 10.1104/pp.104.059170.
22. The Gene Ontology Consortium. GO Database Abbreviations. http://geneontology.org/cgi-bin/xrefs.cgi (14 March 2007, date last accessed).
23. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, et al. Gene ontology: Tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet 2000;25:25-9. doi/10.1038/75556.
24. Senger M. The BioMoby Dashboard. Available at http://biomoby.open-bio.org/CVS_CONTENT/moby-live/Java/docs/ Dashboard.html (14 March 2007, date last accessed).
25. Stevens RD, Robinson AJ, Goble CA. myGrid: Personalised bioinformatics on the information grid. Bioinformatics 2003;19(Suppl 1)i302-4.
26. Object Management Group. Life Sciences Analysis Engine Specification http://www.omg.org/technology/documents/ formal/lsae.htm (14 March 2007, date List accessed).
27. Gordon PMK, Trinh Q, Sensen CW. Semantic web service provision: A realistic framework for bioinformatics programmers. Bioinformatics 2007;23:1178-80.
28. Senger M, Kawas E. MoSeS - Code Generators. http://biomoby.open-bio.org/CVS_CONTENT/moby-live/Java/docs/ Moses-generators.html (14 March 2007, date last accessed).
29. Phillips J, Chilukuri R, Fragoso G, et al. The caCORE software development kit: Streamlining construction of interoperable biomedical information services. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2006;6:2. doi/10.1186/1472-6947-6-2.
30. The World Wide Web Consortium. SOAP 1.2 Specification. http://www.w3.org/TR/soap (14 March 2007, date last accessed).
31. Hull D, Wolstencroft K, Stevens R, et al. Taverna: A tool for building and running workflows of services. Nucleic Acids Res 2006;34:W729-32. doi/10.1093/nar/gk1320.
32. Navas-Delgado I, Rojano-Munoz Mdel M, Ramirez S, et al. Intelligent client for integrating bioinformatics services. Bioinformatics 2006;22:106-11. doi/10.1093/bioinformatics/ bti740.
33. Carrere S, Gouzy J. REMORA: A pilot in the ocean of BioMoby web-services. Bioinformatics 2006;22:900-1. doi/10.1093/ bioinformatics/bdl001.
34. Turinsky AL, Ah-Seng AC, Gordon PM, et al. Bioinformatics visualization and integration with open standards: The Bluejay genomic browser. In Silico Biol 2005;5:187-98.
35. Gordon PMK, Sensen CW. Seahawk: Moving beyond HTML in web-based bioinformatics analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 2007;8:208.
36. Open Biomedical Ontologies Consortium. http://obo.sourceforge.net (14 March 2007, date last accessed).
37. Simple Semantic Web Architecture and Protocol. http://sswap.info. (14 March 2007, date last accessed).
38. Wheeler DL, Barrett T, Benson DA, et al. Database resources of the national center for biotechnology information. Nucleic Acids Res 2006;34:D173-80. doi/10.1093/nar/gkj158.
39. NCBI e-Utilities Function Call. http://eutils.ncbi.nlm. nih.gov/entrez/ eutils/efetch.fcgi?db=gene&mode=xml&id=640 (14 March 2007, date last accessed).
40. Good BM, Tranfield EM, Tan PC, et al. Fast, cheap and out of control: A zero curation model for ontology development. In: Proceedings of the Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing 2006;128-39.
41. Wang G, Liu A Extending XL Schema with nonmonotonic inheritence. Lect Now Comput Science 2003;2814: 402-7. doi/10.1007/b13245.
42. World Wide Web Consortium. Web Ontology Language (OWL). Available http://www.w3.org/2004/OWL (14 March 2007, date last accessed).
43. World Wide Web Consortium. Resource Description Framework (RDF). http://www.w3.org/RDF (14 March 2007, date last accessed).
44. Tsarkov D, Horrocks I. FaCT++ Description Logic Reasoner: System Description. In: Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Automated Reasoning (IJCAR 2006). 2006.
45. Haarslev V, Moller R. Racer: A core inference engine for the semantic web. In: 2nd International Workshop on Evaluation of Ontology-based Tools (EON-2003), Sanibel Island, FL, 2003.
46. Sirin E, Parsia B, Grau BC, et al. Pellet: A practical OWL-DL reasoner. 2006. http://www.mindswap.org/papers/PelletJWS.pdf (9 November 2007. date last accessed).