Statistics and methodology

Skeletal Radiology

Volumn 37, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 393-396

  Obuchowski, Nancy A ^a   Lieber, Michael L ^a  

^a LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTHROSCOPY; BONE RADIOGRAPHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DATA ANALYSIS; GOLD STANDARD; IMAGING; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SAMPLE SIZE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SHORT SURVEY; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; CONSENSUS; CORRELATIONAL STUDY; INFORMATION PROCESSING BIAS; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; NOTE; PERSONAL EXPERIENCE; RESEARCH; STANDARD; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICS; STUDY DESIGN;

DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HUMANS; MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASES; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESEARCH DESIGN; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 43349093358     PISSN: 03642348     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00256-008-0448-1     Document Type: Short Survey

References (10)

1. Reid MC, Lachs MS, Feinstein AR. Use of methodologic standards in diagnostic test research: getting better but still not good. JAMA 1995; 274: 645-651.
2. Sica GT. Bias in research studies. Radiology 2006; 238: 780-789.
3. Obuchowski NA. Special topics III: bias. Radiology 2003; 229: 617-621.
4. Beam CA. Strategies for improving power in diagnostic radiology research. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992; 159: 631-637.
5. Beam CA, Layde PM, Sullivan DC. Variability in the interpretation of screening mammograms by US radiologists: findings from a national sample. Arch Intern Med 1996; 156: 209-213.
6. Obuchowski NA, Zepp RC. Simple steps for improving multiple-reader studies in radiology: perspective. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996; 166: 517-521.
7. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307-310.
8. Gonen M, Panageas KS, Larson SM. Statistical issues in analysis of diagnostic imaging experiments with multiple observations per patient. Radiology 2001; 221: 763-767.
9. Obuchowski NA. On the comparison of correlated proportions for clustered data. Stat Med 1998; 17: 1495-1507.
10. Zhou XH, Obuchowski NA, McClish DL. Statistical methods in diagnostic medicine. New York: Wiley; 2002.