Litigating Equality: The Limits of the Equal Pay Act

Review of Public Personnel Administration

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 199-215

  Zeigler, Sara L ^a  

^a EASTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Equal Pay Act; law; pay gap; sex discrimination; women

Indexed keywords

EID: 43249176723     PISSN: 0734371X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0734371X05278404     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2002). Employed persons by occupation, age and sex. Retrieved December 14, 2004, from www.bls.gov/cps/home.htm%23tables
2. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (2000). Compliance manual, section 10: Compensation discrimination. Retrieved December 4, 2004, from www.eeoc.gov/policy/docs.compensation.htm
3. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (2003). EEOC charge processing procedures. Retrieved December 5, 2004, from www.eeoc.gov/charge/overview_charge_processing.html
4. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (2004). 35yearsofensuringthepromiseof opportunity. Retrieved December 5, 2004, from www.eeoc.gov/abouteeoc/35th/history/index.html
5. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (2005). Equal Pay Act charges: FY 1992-FY 2004. Retrieved May 5, 2005, from www.eeoc.gov/stats/epa.html
6. Equal Pay Act. (1997). Retrieved December 4, 2004, from. www.eeoc.gov/policy/epa.html
7. Greenlaw, P., & Lee, R. (1993). Three decades of experience with the Equal Pay Act. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 13(4), 43-58.
8. Guy, M., & Newman, M. (2004). Women's jobs, men's jobs: Sex segregation and emotional labor. Public Administration Review, 64(3), 289-298.
9. Hartmann, H., & Rose, S. (2004). Still a man's labor market: The long-term earnings gap. Retrieved December 6, 2004, from Institute for Women's Policy Research Web site: www.iwpr.org
10. Kim, M. (2000). Employers’ estimates of market wages: Implications for wage discrimination in the U.S. Feminist Economics, 6(2), 97-114.
11. Loucopoulos, C., Pavur, R., & Gutierrez, C. (2002). Insights into gender discrimination in employment compensation through the use of classification models. Journal of Managerial Issues, 14(3), 375-387.
12. Moss, S. (2004). Women choosing diverse workplaces: A rational preference with disturbing implications for both occupational segregation and economic analysis of law. Harvard Women's Law Journal, 27, 1-88.
13. Mutari, E., Figart, D., & Power, M. (2001). Implicit wage theories in equal pay debates in the United States. Feminist Economics, 7(2), 23-52.
14. Petersen, T., & Saporta, I. (2004). The opportunity structure for discrimination. American Journal of Sociology, 109(4), 852-901.
15. Riccucci, N. (2003). The U.S. Supreme Court's new federalism and its impact on antidiscrimination legislation. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 23(1), 3-22.
16. Spizman, L. (2001). The economist's role in equal pay litigation. Journal of Legal Economics, 11, 69-86.
17. Turner, B., & Laine, C. (2004). Unequal pay for equal work: The gender gap in academic medicine. Annals of Internal Medicine, 143(3), 328-332.
18. Wyman, E. (2003). The current legal framework of sex/gender discrimination law: The unenforced promise of equal pay acts: A national problem and possible solution from Maine. Maine Law Review, 55, 23-62.