Explaining and analyzing audiences: A social cognitive approach to selectivity and media use

Communications

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 279-308

  Peters, Oscar ^a   Rickes, Matthias ^a   Jöckel, Sven ^a   Von Criegern, Christian ^a   Van Deursen, Alexander ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Media use; Social cognitive theory; Uses and gratifications

Indexed keywords

EID: 43249164696     PISSN: 03412059     EISSN: 16134087     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/COMMUN.2006.019     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Babrow, A. S. (1988). Theory and method in research on audience motives. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 32(4), 471-487
2. Babrow, A. S. and Swanson, D. L. (1988). Disentangling antecedents of audience exposure levels: Extending expectancy-value analyses of gratifications sought from television news. Communication Monographs, 55, 1-21
3. th ed.). Berlin: Springer
4. Bagozzi, R. and Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Working paper, University of Michigan
5. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall
6. Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 248-287
7. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman
8. Bandura, A. (2002). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. In J. Bryant and D. Zillman (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 121-155). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
9. th International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE, HI, 2005
10. Dimmick, J., Kline, S., and Stafford, L. (2000). The gratification niches of personal e-mail and the telephone: Competition, displacement, and complementarity. Communication Research, 27(2), 227-248
11. Fornell, C., Tellis, G. J., and Zinkhan, G. M. (1982). Validity assessment: A structural equations approach using partial least squares. In B. Walker (Ed.), An assessment of marketing thought and practice (pp. 405-409). Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association
12. Fritz, W. (1992). Marktorientierte Unternehmensführung und Unternehmenserfolg: Grundlagen und Ergebnisse einer empirischen Untersuchung [Market-oriented management and company success: bases and results of an empirical research]. Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel
13. Greenberg, B. (1974). Gratfications of television viewing and their correlates for British children. In J. G. Blumler and E. Katz (Eds.). The uses of mass communication. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
14. Hofstetter, C. R., Zuniga, S., and Dozier, D. M. (2001). Media self-efficacy: Validation of a new concept. Mass communication and Society, 4(1), 61-78
15. Hendriks Vettehen, P. G., Van Snippenburg, L. B. (2002). Measuring motivations for media exposure: A thesis. Quality and Quantity, 36(3), 259-276
16. Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., and Gurevitch, M. (1974). Utilization of mass communication by the individual. In J. G. Blumler and E. Katz (Eds.), Hie uses of mass communication. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
17. LaRose, R. (1998). Understanding personal telephone behavior. In H. Sawhney and G. Barnett (Eds.), Progress in communication science, Vol. XV: Advances in telecommunications (pp. 1 -27). Stamford, CT: Ablex
18. LaRose, R., Mastro, D. A., and Eastin, M. S. (2001). Understanding Internet usage: A social cognitive approach to uses and gratifications. Social Science Computer Review, 19, 395-413
19. LaRose, R., Lin, C. A., and Eastin, M. S. (2003). Unregulated Internet usage: Addiction, habit, or deficient self-regulation? Media Psychology, 5(3), 224-253
20. LaRose, R. and Eastin, M. S. (2004). A social cognitive theory of Internet uses and gratifications: Toward a new model of media attendance. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 48(3), 358-377
21. Leung, L. and Wei, R. (2000). More than just talk on the move: Uses and gratifications of the cellular phone. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(2), 308-320
22. Lometti, G. E., Reeves, B., and Bybee, C. R. (1977). Investigating the assumptions of uses and gratifications research. Communication Research, 4, 321-338
23. Messaris, P. (1977). Biases of self-reported 'functions' and 'gratifications' of mass media use. A review of general semantics, 34, 316-329
24. McQuail, D. (1994). The rise of media of mass communication. In D. McQuail (Ed.), Mass communication theory: An introduction (pp. 1-29). London: Sage
25. McQuail, D. (2001). With more hindsight: Conceptual problems and some ways forward for media use research. Communications: Hie European Journal of Communication Research, 26(4), 337-350
26. th revised ed.). Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag
27. Palmgreen, P., Wenner, L., and Rosegren, K. (1985). Uses and gratifications research: The past ten years. In K. Rosegren, L. Wenner, and P. Palmgreen (Eds.), Media gratifications research (pp. 11 -37). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
28. Peters, O. and Ben Allouch, S. (2005). Always connected: A longitudinal field study of mobile communication. Telematics and Informatics, 22(3), 239-256
29. th revised ed.). Tübingen: Mohr
30. Rickes, M., Linke, J., and Criegern, C. von (2006). Aktive Mediennutzung und Habitualisierung. Beitrag der sozial-kognitiven Hieorie Banduras zur Integration beider Konzepte [Active media use and habitualization. The contribution of Bandura's social cognitive theory in integrating both concepts]. Manuscript in preparation
31. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press
32. Rosegren, K. E. (1974). Uses and gratifications: A paradigm outlined. In J. G. Blumler and E. Katz (Eds.), Hie uses of mass communication. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
33. st century. Mass Communication and Society, 3(1), 3-37
34. Stone, D. (1998). Social cognitive theory. Available (consulted 30 January 2006) at: mwv.med.usf.edu/kmbrown/Social-Cognitive-Theory-Overview.htm