Democracy, solidarity and global exclusion

Philosophy & Social Criticism

Volumn 32, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 809-817

  Bohman, James ^a  

^a SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 43249152663     PISSN: 01914537     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0191453706068835     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. John Dewey, The Public and its Problems, in The Later Works, 1925–1927, vol. 2 (Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press, 1988), p. 325.
2. Iris Young, Inclusion and Democracy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002), p. 35.
3. Jürgen Habermas, The Postnational Constellation (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2001), p. 63.
4. See Jürgen Habermas, Between Facts and Norms (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996), p. 296.
5. Also on decentering, see Gerald Frug, City Making (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999), part II.
6. Young, Inclusion and Democracy, p. 46.
7. The concept of ‘structural transformation’ is used in Habermas' sense as ‘a basic shift in the subject, function and domain’ of an institution, here the public sphere. See Jürgen Habermas, The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1989), 2.
8. J. H. H. Weiler, The Constitution of Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), pp. 267–68.
9. See Anthony Padgen, Lords of all the World, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1996), ch. 5. As he puts it: ‘the Enlightenment was, perhaps more than has been recognized, the product of a world which was ridding itself of its first, but by no means, alas, its last imperial legacy’ (p. 200).
10. Hannah Arendt, Origins of Totalitarianism (New York: Harcourt Brace, 1976), p. 479.
11. See Philip Pettit, Republicanism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998), p. 88.
12. See Allan Buchanan, Justice, Legitimacy and Self-Determination (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004), ch. 3.