Experiments on authorship attribution by intertextual distance in English

Journal of Quantitative Linguistics

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 33-80

  Labbe, Dominique ^a  

^a Laboratoire PACTE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 43249145437     PISSN: 09296174     EISSN: 17445035     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09296170600850601     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Barthélémy, J.-P., & Guénoche, A. (1991). Trees and Proximity Representations. New York: Wiley.
2. Burrows, J. (2002). Delta: A measure of stylistic difference and a guide to likely authorship. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 17, 267-287.
3. Burrows, J. (2003). Questions of authorship: Attribution and beyond. Computers and the Humanities, 37, 1-32.
4. Craig, H. (1999). Authorial attribution and computational stylistics: If you can tell authors apart, have you learned anything about them? Literary and Linguistic Computing, 14, 103-113.
5. Eliott, W. E. Y., & Valenza, R. J. (2001). Smoking guns and silver bullets: Could John Ford have written the funeral elegy? Literary and Linguistic Computing, 16, 205-232.
6. Hockey, S., & Martin, J. (1988). OCP Users' Manual. Oxford: Oxford University Computing Service.
7. Holmes, D. I. (1995). The Federalist revisited: new directions in autorship attribution. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 10, 111-127.
8. Hoover, D. L. (2001). Statistical stylistics and authorship attribution: An empirical investigation. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 16, 421-444.
9. Labbé, C., & Labbé, D. (2001). Inter-textual distance and authorship attribution Corneille and Molière. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 8, 213-231.
10. Labbé, C., & Labbé, D. (2003). La distance intertextuelle. Corpus, 2, 95-118.
11. Labbé, C., & Labbé, D. (2005). A tool for literary studies. Inter-textual distance and tree-classification. To be published in Literary and Linguistic Computing.
12. Ledger, G. R. (1995). An exploration of differences in the Pauline Epistles. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 10, 85-97.
13. Love, H. (2002). Attributing Authorship: an Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Luong, X. (1988). Méthodes d'analyse arborée. Algorithmes, applications. Thèse pour le doctorat ès sciences, Université de Paris V.
15. Merriam, T. (2002). Intertextual distances between Shakespeare plays, with special reference to Henry V (verse). Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 9, 260-273.
16. Merriam, T. (2003a). An application of authorship attribution by intertextual distance in English. Corpus, 2, 167-182.
17. Merriam, T. (2003b). Intertextual distances, three authors. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 18, 379-388.
18. Merriam, T. (2005). The Identity of Shakespeare in Henry VIII. Tokyo: The Renaissance Institute.
19. Rudman, J. (1998). The state of authorship attribution studies: Some problems and solutions. Computers and the Humanities, 351-365.
20. Rulmann, M. (2003). Analyse arborée. Représentation arborée par la méthode des groupements. Grenoble: Polytech'Grenoble et Cerat-IEP.