Complement-taking predicates: Usage and linguistic structure

Studies in Language

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 569-606

  Boye, Kasper ^a   Harder, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 43249145397     PISSN: 03784177     EISSN: 15699978     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/sl.31.3.03boy     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Aijmer, Karin. 1997.I think - an English modal particle. Modality in Germanic languages. Historical and comparative perspectives, Toril Swan and Olaf Jansen Westwik (eds.), 1-47. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
2. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2003. Evidentiality in typological perspective. Studies in evidentiality, Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald and R.M.W. Dixon (eds.), 1-31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
3. Aikhenvald, Alexandra. Y. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: OUR
4. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. & R.M.W. Dixon (eds.). 2003. Studies in evidentiality. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
5. Bates, Elizabeth and Brian MacWhinney. 1987. Competition, variation and language learning. Mechanisms of language acquisition, Brian MacWhinney (ed.), 157-193. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6. Benveniste, Émil. 1971. Subjectivity in language. Problems in general linguistics, transl. by M. E. Meek, 223-230. Miami FL: University of Miami Press.
7. Boye, Kasper. 2001. Evidence for evidentiality in Danish. On modality, Henrik Høeg Müller (ed.), 81-127. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.
8. Boye, Kasper. 2002. Modalitet, evidentialitet og epistemicitet. En teori om de tre sproglige kategorier og en analyse af deres verbale manifestationer i dansk. MA thesis, University of Southern Denmark.
9. Boye, Kasper. 2005a. Raising verbs vs. auxiliaries. Historical linguistics 2003, Michael Fortescue; Eva Skafte Jensen; Jens Erik Mogensen and Lene Schøsler (eds.), 31-46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
10. Boye, Kasper. 2005b. Modality and the concept of force-dynamic potential. Modality: Studies in form and function, Alex Klinge and Henrik Høeg Müller (eds.), 49-80. London: Equinox.
11. Brinton, Laurel J. 1996. Pragmatic markers in English. Grammaticalization and discourse functions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
12. Bybee, Joan L. and Östen Dahl. 1989. The creation of tense and aspect systems in the languages of the world. Studies in Language 13(1): 51-103.
13. Bybee, Joan L. and Paul J. Hopper (eds.). 2001. Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
14. Bybee, Joan L. and W. Pagliuca. 1985. Cross-linguistic comparison and the development of grammatical meaning. Historical semantics. Historical word-formation, Jacek Fisiak (ed.), 59-83. Berlin: Mouton.
15. Bybee, Joan; Revere Perkins and William Pagliuca. 1994. The evolution of grammar. Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.
16. Chafe, Wallace L. and Johanna Nichols (eds.). 1986. Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology. Norwood NJ: Ablex.
17. Choi, Soonja. 1995. The development of epistemic sentence-ending modal forms and functions in Korean children. Modality in grammar and discourse, Joan Bybee & Suzanne Fleischman (eds.), 165-204. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
18. Corum, Claudia. 1975. A pragmatic analysis of parenthetic adjuncts. Papers from the eleventh regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Robin E. Grossman, L. James San and Timothy J. Vance (eds.), 133-141.
19. Croft, W. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar. Oxford: OUP.
20. Diessel, Holger and Michael Tomasello. 2001. The acquisition of finite complement clauses in English: A corpus-based analysis. Cognitive Linguistics 12(2): 97-141.
21. Dik, Simon C. 1989. The theory of Functional Grammar. Vol. 1: The structure of the clause. Dordrecht: Foris.
22. Dik, Simon C. 1997a. The theory of Functional Grammar. Part 1: The structure of the clause, Kees Hengeveld (ed.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
23. Dik, Simon C. 1997b. The theory of Functional Grammar. Part 2: Complex and derived constructions, Kees Hengeveld (ed.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
24. Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth, Michael Fortescue, Peter Harder, Lars Heltoft & Lisbeth Falster Jakobsen (eds.). 1996. Content, expression and structure: Studies in Danish functional grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
25. Fortescue, Michael. 2003. Evidentiality in West Greenlandic: A case of scattered coding. Studies in evidentiality, Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R.M.W. Dixon (eds.), 291-306. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
26. Gary, Judith Olmstead and Saad Gamal-Eldin. 1982. Cairene Egyptian Colloquial Arabic. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
27. Givón, T. 1995. Functionalism and grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
28. Gordon, Lyn. 1986. The development of evidential in Maricopa. Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology, Wallace Chafe and Johanna Nichols (eds.), 75-88. Norwood NJ: Ablex.
29. Guentchéva, Zlatka. (ed.). 1996. L'énonciation médiatisée. Paris: Édition Peeters.
30. Haiman, John. 1994. Ritualization and the development of language. Perspectives on grammaticalization, William Pagliuca (ed.), 3-28. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
31. Harder, Peter. 1999a. Partial autonomy. Ontology and methodology in Cognitive Linguistics. Cognitive Linguistics: Foundations, scope and methodology, Theo Janssen and Gisela Redeker (eds.), 195-222. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
32. Harder, Peter. 1999b. Function, cognition and layered clause structure. Cognitive Semantics. Meaning and cognition, Jens Allwood and Peter Gärdenfors (eds.), 37-66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
33. Haspelmath, Martin. 1993. A grammar of Lezgian. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
34. Hengeveld, Kees. 2004. The architecture of a Functional Discourse Grammar. A new architecture for Functional Grammar, J. Lachlan Mackenzie & Maria de los Angeles Gómez-Gonzáles (eds.), 1-21. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
35. Hooper, Joan B. 1975. On assertive predicates. Syntax and Semantics 4, John P. Kimball (ed.), 91-124. New York NY: Academic Press.
36. Hopper, Paul J. 1991. On some principles of grammaticalization. Approaches to grammaticalization I, Elizabeth Closs Traugott and Bernd Heine (eds.), 17-35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
37. Hopper, Paul J. and Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 1993. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP.
38. Horn, Laurence R. 1989. A natural history of negation. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.
39. Ifantidou, Elly, 2001. Evidentials and relevance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
40. Kiparsky, Paul and Carol Kiparsky. 1970. Fact. Progress in linguistics, Manfred Bierwisch & Karl E. Heidolph (eds.), 143-173. The Hague: Mouton.
41. Kornfilt, Jaklin. 1997. Turkish. London: Routledge.
42. Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information structure and sentence form. Topic, focus and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge: CU.
43. Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.
44. Langacker, Ronald. W. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 2: Descriptive applications. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.
45. Langacker, Ronald W. 2000. A dynamic usage-based model. Usage-based models of language, Michael Barlow and Susanne Kemmer (eds.), 1-63. Stanford CA: CSLI Publications.
46. Levinson, Stephen C. 2000. Presumptive meanings. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
47. Newmeyer, Frederick J. 2003. Grammar is grammar and usage is usage. Language 79(4): 682-707.
48. Noonan, Michael. 1985. Complementation. Language typology and syntactic description, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 42-139. Cambridge: CUP.
49. Nuyts, Jan. 2001. Epistemic modality, language, and conceptualization: A cognitive-pragmatic perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
50. Nuyts, Jan. 2002. Grounding and the system of epistemic expressions in Dutch: A cognitive-functional view. Grounding, Frank Brisard (ed.), 433-466. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
51. Östman, Jan-Ola. 1981. "You know": A discourse functional view. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
52. Palmer, Frank R. 1986. Mood and modality. (1st edn.). Cambridge: CUP.
53. Palmer, Frank R. 2001. Mood and modality. (2nd edn.). Cambridge: CUP.
54. Perkins, Michael R. 1983. Modal expressions in English. London: Frances Pinter.
55. Pierrehumbert, Janet B. 2001. Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition and contrast. Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure, Joan L. Bybee and Paul J. Hopper (eds.), 137-158. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
56. Quirk, Randolph; Sidney Greenbaum; Geoffrey N. Leech and Jan. Svartvik. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of English. London: Longman.
57. Schilperoord, Joost and Arie Verhagen. 1998. Conceptual dependency and the clausal structure of discourse. Discourse and cognition: Bridging the gap, Jean-Pierre Koenig (ed.), 141-163. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.
58. Slobin, Dan. 1996. From 'thought and language' to 'thinking for speaking'. Rethinking linguistic relativity, John Joseph Gumperz and Stephen C. Levinson (eds.), 70-96. Cambridge: CUP.
59. Slobin, Dan. 2000. Verbalized events: A dynamic approach to linguistic relativity and determinism. Evidence for linguistic relativity, Susanne Niemeier and René Dirven (eds.), 107-138. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
60. Slobin, Dan. 2003. The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives, Sven Strömqvist and Ludo Verhoeven (eds.), 219-257. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
61. Talmy, Leonard. 1985. Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. Language typology and syntactic description. Vol. III: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 36-149. Cambridge: CUP.
62. Thompson, Sandra A. 2002. 'Object complements' and conversation. Studies in Language 26(1): 125-164.
63. Thompson, Sandra A. and Anthony Mulac. 1991. A quantitative perspective on the grammaticization of epistemic parentheticals in English. Approaches to grammaticalization II, Elizabeth Closs Traugott and Bernd Heine (eds.), 313-329. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
64. Urmson, James O. 1952. Parenthetical verbs. Mind 61: 480-496.
65. Verhagen, Arie. 2001. Subordination and discourse segmentation revisited, or: Why matrix clauses may be more dependent than complements. Text representation. Linguistic and psychological aspects, Ted Sanders; Joost Schilperoord and Wilbert Spooren (eds.), 337-357. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
66. Verhagen, Arie. 2006. On subjectivity and 'long distance Wh-movement'. Subjectification: Various paths to subjectivity, Angeliki Athanasiadou, Costas Canakis and Bert Cornillie (eds.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
67. Willett, Thomas. 1988. A cross-linguistic survey of the grammaticization of evidentiality. Studies in Language 12(1): 51-97.