Speaking on behalf of others: Rhetorical agency and epideictic functions in official apologies

Rhetoric Society Quarterly

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 25-45

  Villadsen, Lisa Storm ^a  

^a Section of Rhetoric   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 43249144836     PISSN: 02773945     EISSN: 1930322X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02773940701779769     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Beale Walter H., “Rhetorical Performative Discourse: A New Theory of Epideictic.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 11 (1978): 221-246.
2. Brooks Roy L., “The Age of Apology.” When Sorry Isn’t Enough. The Controversy over Apologies and Reparations for Human Injustice. Ed. Roy L. Brooks. New York: New York University Press, 1999. 3-11.
3. Bryld Claus., “Hvad kan vi bruge besættelsestiden til i dag?” (“What can we learn from the occupation period to us today?”) Kritik 38 (2005): 1-8.
4. Cunningham Michael., “Saying Sorry: The Politics of Apology.” The Political Quarterly 70 (1999): 285-293.
5. Downey Sharon D., “The Evolution of the Rhetorical Genre of Apologia.” Western Journal of Communication 57 (1993): 42-64.
6. Geisler Cheryl., “How Ought We to Understand the Concept of Rhetorical Agency? Report from the ARS.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 34 (2004): 9-17.
7. Hauser Gerard A., “Aristotle on Epideictic: The Formation of Public Morality.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 29 (1999): 5-23.
8. Hauser Gerard A., “Editor’s Introduction.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 37 (2004): 181-187.
9. Harter Lynn M., Ronald J. Stephens, and Phyllis M. Japp. “President Clinton’s Apology for the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment: A Narrative of Remembrance, Redefinition, and Reconciliation.” The Howard Journal of Communications 11 (2000): 19-34.
10. Hearit Keith Michael., Mistakes Were Made: Organizations, Apologia and Crises of Social Legitimacy. Communication Studies 46 (1995): 1-17.
11. Hoff Clausen., E Elisabeth., Christine Isager., Lisa Storm Villadsen., “Retorisk agency- Hvad skaber retorikken?” (“Rhetorical agency-What makes rhetoric=What does rhetoric make?”) Rhetorica Scandinavica 33 (2005): 56-65.
12. Jasinski, James. Sourcebook on Rhetoric. Key Concepts in Contemporary Rhetorical Studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2001.
13. Kiss Elizabeth., “Saying We’re Sorry: Liberal Democracy and the Rhetoric of Collective Identity.” Constellations 4 (1998): 387-398.
14. Koesten, Joy and Robert C. Rowland. “The Rhetoric of Atonement.” Communication Studies 55 (2004): 68-87.
15. Leff Michael., “Interpretation and the Art of the Rhetorical Critic.” Western Journal of Speech Communication 44 (1980): 337-349.
16. Lundberg Christian., Joshua Gunn., “Ouija Board, Are There Any Communications?’ Agency, Ontotheology, and the Death of the Humanist Subject, or Continuing the ARS Conversation.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 35 (2005): 83-105.
17. Oravec Christine., “Observation’ in Aristotle’s Theory of Epideictic.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 9 (1976): 162-174.
18. Rollins Brooke., “The Ethics of Epideictic Rhetoric: Addressing the Problem of Presence through Derrida’s Funeral Orations.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 35 (2005): 5-23.
19. Rosenfield Lawrence W., “The Practical Celebration of Epideictic Rhetoric.” Rhetoric in Transition. Ed. Eugene E. White. University Park: Penn State University Press, 1980. 131-155.
20. Sheard Cynthia Miecznikowski., “The Public Value of Epideictic Rhetoric.” College English 58 (1996): 765-794.
21. Sullivan Dale L., “The Ethos of Epideictic Encounter.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 26 (1993): 113-133.
22. Surrugue Ste´phanie., “Undskyld!” (“Sorry!”) Politiken 4 May 2005. Section 2:1.
23. Ware B. L., Will Linkugel., “They Spoke in Defense of Themselves.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 59 (1973): 273-283.