Ageism in the workplace

Generations

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 84-89

  Dennis, Helen ^a   Thomas, Kathryn ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 43249141904     PISSN: 07387806     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. AARP. 1989. Business and Older Workers - Current Perception and New Directions for the 1990's. Washington, D.C.
2. AARP. 1995a. Workers Over 50: Old Myths, New Realities. Washington, D.C.
3. AARP.1995b. Business and Older Workers: A Roadmap to the 21st Century. Washington, D.C.
4. AARP. 2000. American Business and Older Employees: A Summary of Findings. Washington, D.C.
5. AARP-DYG, Inc. 1992. Employment Policy and the Older Worker in the 1990's. Washington, D.C.
6. Anti-Ageism Taskforce. 2006. Ageism in America. New York: International Longevity Center - USA.
7. Bendick, M., Brown, L. E., and Wall, K. 1999. "No Foot in the Door: An Experimental Study of Employment Discrimination Against Older Workers." Journal of Aging & Social Policy 10(4): 5-23.
8. Butler, R. N. 1975. Why Survive?: Being Old in America. San Francisco: Harper & Row.
9. Davis, J. A., Smith, T., and Marsden, P. V. 2003. General Social Survey 2002. Princeton, N.J.: Cultural Policy and the Arts National Data Archive.
10. Dennis, H. 1988. Fourteen Steps in Managing an Aging Work Force. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.
11. Department of Labor, OYce of Federal Contract Compliance Programs. 2005. "Obligation to Solicit Race and Gender Data for Agency Enforcement Purposes." OYce of Federal Contract Compliance Programs, 41 cfr Part 60-1, vol. 70, no. 194, pp. 58945-63. http://www. dol.gov/esa/regs/fedreg/Wnal/ 2005020176.htm. Accessed July 15, 2006.
12. Doering, M., Rhodes, S. R., and Schuster, M. 1983. The Aging Worker. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
13. EEOC. 2006a. Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) Charges FY 1992-FY 2005. Washington, D.C.: Author. http://www.eeoc.gov/stats/adea.html. Accessed November 13, 2006.
14. EEOC. 2006b. EEOC Litigation Statistics, FY 1992 Through FY 2005. Washington, D.C.: Author. http://www. eeoc.gov/stats/litigation.html. Accessed November 17, 2006.
15. Finkelstein, L. M, Burke, M. J., and Raju, N. S. 1995. "Age Discrimination in Simulated Employment Contexts: An Integrative Analysis." Journal of Applied Psychology 125(4): 317-45.
16. McCann, L. 2003. Age Discrimination in Employment Legislation in the United States Experience. Washington, D.C.: AARP Foundation Litigation.
17. McCann, R., and Giles, H. 2002. "Ageism in the Workplace: A Communication Perspective." In T. Nelson, ed., Ageism: Stereotyping and Prejudice Against Older Persons. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
18. Munnell, A. H., Sass, S. A., and Soto, M. 2006. "Employer Attitudes Towards Older Workers: Survey Results." Boston: Center for Retirement Research.
19. Neumark, D. 2001. Age Discrimination Legislation in the United States. NBER Working Paper No. w8152. Cambridge, Mass: National Bureau of Economic Research.
20. Rosen, B., and Jerdee, T. H. 1976. "The Nature of Job-Related Age Stereotypes." Journal of Applied Psychology 61(2): 180-3.
21. Rosen, B., and Jerdee, T. H. 1977. "Too Old or Not Too Old." Harvard Business Review November: 97-106.
22. Rosen, B., and Jerdee, T. H. 1985. Older Employees: New Roles for Valued Resources. Homewood, Ill.: Dow Jones-Irwin.
23. Sheppard, H. L. 1970. Towards an Industrial Gerontology. Cambridge, Mass.: Schenkman
24. Sterns, H., andMcDaniel. M. 1994. Job Performance and the Older Worker. AARP Public Policy Institute Working Paper No. 9412. Washington D.C.: AARP.