The microlevel discourse of social movement framing: Debating antiwar protests on a university listserv

Sociological Focus

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 26-47

  Hedley, Mark ^a   Clark, Sara A ^a  

^a SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY EDWARDSVILLE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 43249138681     PISSN: 00380237     EISSN: 21621128     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00380237.2007.10571297     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Altheide, David L. 1987. “Ethnographic Content Analysis.” Qualitative Sociology 10:65-77.
2. American Sociological Association Committee on Professional Ethics. 1999. Code of Ethics and Policies and Procedures. New York: American Sociological Association.
3. Bateson, Gregory. 1972. Steps to an Ecology of Mind. New York: Ballantine.
4. Benford, Robert D. 1997. “An Insiders Critique of the Social Movement Framing Perspective.” Sociological Inquiry 67:409-430.
5. Benford, Robert D. 1993. “Frame Disputes within the Nuclear Disarmament Movement.” Social Forces 71:677-701.
6. Benford, Robert D. and David. A. Snow. 2000. “Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment.” Annual Review of Sociology 26:611-39.
7. Benford, Robert D. and Scott A. Hunt. 1994. “Dramaturgy and Social Movements: The Social Construction and Communication of Power.” Sociological Inquiry 62:36-55.
8. Coffey, Brian and Stephen Woolworth. 2004. “Destroy the Scum and Neuter Their Families: The Web as a Vehicle for Community Discourse?” Social Science Journal 41:1-14.
9. Coulthard, Malcolm. 1985. An Introduction to Discourse Analysis. New York: Longman.
10. Edwards, Derek and Jonathan Potter. 1992. Discursive Psychology. London: Sage.
11. Fine, Gary. A. 1995. “Public Narration and Group Culture: Discerning Discourse in Social Movements.” Pp. 127-143 in Social Movements and Culture, edited by Hank Johnston and Bert Klandermans. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
12. Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame Analysis. New York: Harper and Row.
13. Halliday, Michael A.K. and Ruqaiya Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
14. Hunt, Scott A., Robert D. Benford, and David A. Snow. 1994. “Identity Fields: Framing Processes and the Social Construction of Movement Identities.” Pp. 185-208 in New Social Movements: From Ideology to Identity, edited by Enrique Larana, Hank Johnston, and Joseph R. Gusfield. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
15. Johnston, Hank. 1995. “A Methodology for Frame Analysis: From Discourse to Cognitive Schema.” Pp. 217-246 in Social Movements and Culture, edited by Hank Johnston and Bert Klandermans. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
16. Johnston, Hank. 2002. “Verification and Proof in Frame and Discourse Analysis.” Pp. 62-91 in Methods of Social Movement Research, edited by Bert Klandermans and Suzanne Staggenberg. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
17. Jones, Steve, ed. 1999. Doing Internet Research: Critical Issues and Methods for Examining the Net. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18. Jordan, Tim. 1999. Cyberpower: The Culture and Politics of Cyberspace and the Internet. New York: Routledge.
19. Klandermans, Bert and Sjoerd Goslinga. 1996. “Media Discourse, Movement Publicity, and the Generation of Collective Action Frames: Theoretical and Empirical Exercises in Meaning Construction.” Pp. 312-337 in Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements, edited by Doug McAdam, John D. McCarthy, and Mayer N. Zald. New York: Cambridge University Press.
20. Lee, Hangwoo. 2006. “Privacy, Publicity, and Accountability of Self-Presentation in an Online Discussion Group.” Sociological Inquiry 76:1-22.
21. McAdam, Doug, John D. McCarthy, and Mayer N. Zald. 1996. “Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Framing Processes: Toward a Synthetic, Comparative Perspective on Social Movements.” Pp. 1-20 in Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements, edited by Doug McAdam, John D. McCarthy, and Mayer N. Zald. New York: Cambridge University Press.
22. McFarland, Daniel A. 2004. “Resistance as a Social Drama: A Study of Change-Oriented Encounters.” American Journal of Sociology 109:1249-1318.
23. Myers, David. 1987. “Anonymity is Part of the Magic: Individual Manipulation of Computer Mediated Communication Contexts.” Qualitative Sociology 19:251-266.
24. Nguyen, Dan T. and Jon Alexander. 1996. “The Coming of Cyberspacetime and the End of the Polity.” Pp. 99-124 in Cultures of the Internet, edited by R. Shields. London: Sage.
25. Putnam, Robert. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
26. Schultz, Tanjev. 2000. “Mass Media and the Concept of Interactivity: An Exploratory Study of Online Forums and Reader Email.” Media, Culture, and Society 22:205-221.
27. Snow, David A. and Robert D. Benford. 1992. “Master Frames and Cycles of Protest.” Pp. 133-155 in Frontiers of Social Movement Theory, edited by Bert Klandermans, Hanspeter Kriesi, and Sidney Tarrow. Greenwich, CT: JA1.
28. Snow, David A. and Robert D. Benford. 1988. “Ideology, Frame Resonance, and Participant Mobilization.” International Social Movement Research 1:197-218.
29. Snow, David A., E. Burke Rochford, Jr., Steven K. Worden, and Robert D. Benford. 1986. “Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Social Movement Participation.” American Sociological Review 51:546-581.
30. Van Dijk, Teun A. 1997. “The Study of Discourse.” Pp. 1-34 in Discourse as Structure and Process, edited by Teun A. van Dijk. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31. Van Dijk, Teun A. 1988a. News as Discourse. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
32. Van Dijk, Teun A. 1988b. Case Studies of International and National News in the Press. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
33. Van Emeron, Frans H., Rob Grootendorst, Sally Jackson, and Scott Jacobs. 1997. “Argumentation.” Pp. 208-229 in Discourse as Structure and Process, edited by Teun A. van Dijk. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34. Wetherell, Margaret, Stephanie Taylor, and Simeon J. Yates. 2001. Discourse as Data: A Guide for Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35. Wuthnow, Robert. 1989. Communities of Discourse: Ideology and Social Structure in the Reformation, the Enlightenment, and European Socialism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.