Backgrounding and suppression of reciprocal participants: A cross-linguistic study

Studies in Language

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 327-408

  Behrens, Leila ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 43249134113     PISSN: 03784177     EISSN: 15699978     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/sl.31.2.04beh     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Bartha, Katalin. 1991. Az igeképzés. A magyar nyelv történeti nyelvtana. A korai ómagyar kor és elozményei, Lóránd Benko, Erzsébet E. Abaffy, and Rácz Endre, (eds.), 60-103. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadö.
2. Behrens, Leila. 2005. Genericity from a cross-linguistic perspective. Linguistics 43(2): 275-344.
3. Bresnan, Joan. 2001. Lexical-functional syntax. Maiden MA: Blackwell.
4. Carlson, Greg N. 1979. Generics and atemporal. When. Linguistics and Philosophy 3:49-98.
5. Dalrymple, Mary; Makoto Kanazawa; Yookyung Kim; Sam Mchombo and Stanley Peters, 1998. Reciprocal expressions and the concept of reciprocity. Linguistics and Philosophy 21:159-210.
6. Davies, William D. 2000. Events in Madurese reciprocals. Oceanic Linguistics 39(1): 123-143.
7. Dowry, David. 1991. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67(3): 547-619.
8. Evans, Nicholas; Alice Gaby and Rachel Nordlinger. 2004. Compromising transitivity: The problem of reciprocals. MS, University of Melbourne. (http://www.linguistics.unimelb.edu.au/research/projects/reciprocals/papers/ comp.trans-final.pdf)
9. Fiengo, Robert and Howard Lasnik. 1973. The logical structure of reciprocal sentences. Foundations of Language 9(4):447-468.
10. Fillmore, Charles J. 1968. The case for case. Universals in linguistic theory, Bach, Emmon and Robert T. Harms, (eds.), 1-88. New York NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
11. Fillmore, Charles J. and Beryl T. Sue Atkins. 1992. Toward a frame-based lexicon: The semantics of RISK and its neighbors. Frames, fields, and contrasts. New essays in semantic and lexical organization, Adrienne Lehrer and Eva Feder Kittay, (eds.),75-102. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12. Frajzyngier, Zygmund. 2000. Coding of the reciprocal function. Frajzyngier, Zygmund and Traci S. Curl (eds.), 179-194.
13. Frajzyngier, Zygmund and Traci S. Curl, (eds.) 2000. Reciprocals. Forms and functions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
14. Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions. A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
15. Grétsy, László and Miklós Kovalovszky (eds.) 1985. Nyelvmuvelo kézikönyv. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
16. Haegeman, Liliane. 1991. Introduction to government and binding theory (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
17. Haiman, John. 1983. Iconic and economic motivation. Language 59(4):781-819.
18. Heim, Irene; Howard Lasnik and Robert May. 1991. Reciprocity and plurality. Linguistic Inquiry 22(1):63-101.
19. Jászó, A. Anna (ed.) 1997. A magyar nyelv kézikönyve. Negyedik kiadás. Budapest: Trezor Kiadó.
20. Kemmer, Suzanne. 1993. The middle voice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins [Typological Studies in Language 22].
21. Kenesei, István; M. Robert Vago and Anna Fenyvesi. 1998. Hungarian. London & New York: Routledge [Descriptive Grammars].
22. Kim, Yookyung and Stanley Peters. 1998. Semantic and pragmatic context-dependence: The case of reciprocals. Is the best good enough? Optimality and competition in syntax, Pilar Barbosa; Danny Fox; Paul Hagstrom; Martha McGinnis and David Pesetsky (eds.), 221-247. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
23. Knjazev, Jurij P. 1998. Towards a typology of grammatical polysemy: Reflexive markers as markers of reciprocity. Typology of verbal categories, Leonid Kulikov and Heinz Vater, (eds.), 185-93. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
24. König, Ekkehard and Peter Siemund. 1999. Intensifiers and reflexives: A typological perspective. Reflexives. Forms and functions, Frajzyngier, Zygmund and Traci S. Curl, (eds.), 41-74. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
25. Kunzmann-Müller, Barbara. 1999. Grammatikhandbuch des Kroatischen unter Einschluß des Serbischen, Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
26. Langendoen, D. Terence. 1978. The logic of reciprocity. Linguistic Inquiry 9(2): 177-197.
27. Levin, Beth. 1993. English verb classes and alternations. A preliminary investigation. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.
28. Lichtenberk, Frantisek. 1985. Multiple uses of reciprocal constructions. Australian Journal of Linguistics 5:19-41.
29. McGregor, William. 2000. Reflexive and reciprocal construction in Nyulnyulan languages. Zygmund Frajzyngier and Traci S. Curl, (eds.), 85-122.
30. Mchombo, Sam. 1991. Reciprocalization in Chichewa: A lexical account. Linguistics Analysis 21(l-2):3-22.
31. Mchombo, Sam and Armindo A.A. Ngunga. 1994. The syntax and semantics of reciprocal construction in Ciyao. Linguistic Analysis 24: 3-31,
32. Mohanan, K.P. and Tara Mohanan. 1998. Strong and weak projection: Lexical reflexives and reciprocals. The projection of arguments. Lexical and compositional factors, Miriam Butt and Wilhelm Geuder (eds.), 165-194. Stanford CA: CSLI.
33. Morev, Lev. 1996. Reciprocal and cooperative in Tai. Mon-Khmer Studies: A Journal of Southeast Asian Languages 26:333-337.
34. Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. 2002. Karachay-Balkar reciprocals. Turkic Languages 6(1):19-80.
35. Reinhart, Tanya and Eric Reuland. 1993. Reflexivity. Linguistic Inquiry 24(4):657-20.
36. Seidl, Amanda and Alexis Dimitriadis. 2003. Statives and reciprocal morphology in Swahili. Typology des langues d'Afrique et universaux de la grammaire, Vol. 1. Patrick Sauzet and Anne Zribi-Hertz, (eds.), Paris: L'Hartman. Online: http://www.let.uu.nl/∼Alexis.Dimitriadis/personal/papers/stative-paris02.pdf
37. Siloni, Tal. 2001. Reciprocal verbs. IATL 17. Online: http://atar.mscc.huji.ac.il/∼english/IATL/17/TOC.html
38. van de Kerke, Simon. 1992. The reciprocal marker -na in Bolivian Quechua. Linguistics in the Netherlands, Reineke Bok-Bennema and Roeland van Hout (eds.), 149-159. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
39. Zifonun, Gisela; Ludger Hoffmann and Bruno Strecker. 1997. Grammatik der deutschen Sprache. Bd. 2. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
40. Zwicky, Arnold M. and Jerrold M. Sadock. 1975. Ambiguity tests and how to fail them. Syntax and Semantics 4, John P. Kimball (ed.), 1-36. New York NY: Academic Press.