Long-term follow-up of orthokeratology corneal reshaping using wavefront aberrometry and contrast sensitivity

Eye and Contact Lens

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 140-145

  Stillitano, Iane ^a,b   Schor, Paulo ^a   Lipener, Cesar ^a   Hofling Lima, Ana Luisa ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b NONE   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Aberrometry; Contrast sensitivity; Corneal reshaping; Orthokeratology

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASTIGMATISM; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTACT LENS; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; ORTHOKERATOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PUPIL; SLEEP; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

CONTACT LENSES; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CORNEA; CORNEAL TOPOGRAPHY; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; ORTHOKERATOLOGIC PROCEDURES; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REFRACTION, OCULAR; REFRACTIVE ERRORS; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 43249112311     PISSN: 15422321     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ICL.0b013e318145ab5d     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Applegate RA, Hilmantel G, Howland HC. Corneal aberrations increase with the magnitude of radial keratotomy refractive correction. Optom Vis Sci 1996;73:585-589.
2. Oshika T, Klyce SD, Applegate RA, et al. Comparison of corneal wavefront aberrations after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis. Am J Ophthalmol 1999;127:1-7.
3. Schwiegerling J, Snyder RW. Corneal ablation patterns to correct for spherical aberration in photorefractive keratectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg 2000;26:214-221.
4. Oshika T, Miyata K, Tokunaga T, et al. Higher order wavefront aberrations of cornea and magnitude of refractive correction in laser in situ keratomileusis. Ophthalmology 2002;109:1154-1158.
5. Marcos S, Barbero S, Llorente L, et al. Optical response to LASIK surgery for myopia from total and corneal aberration measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001;42:3349-3356.
6. Moreno-Barriuso E, Lloves JM, Marcos S, et al. Ocular aberrations before and after myopic corneal refractive surgery: LASIK-induced changes measured with laser ray tracing. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001;42:1396-1403.
7. Berntsen DA, Barr JT, Mitchell GL. The effect of overnight contact lens corneal reshaping on higher-order aberrations and best-corrected visual acuity. Optom Vis Sci 2005;82:490-497.
8. Joslin CE, Wu SM, McMahon TT, et al. Higher-order wavefront aberrations in corneal refractive therapy. Optom Vis Sci 2003;80:805-811.
9. Hiraoka T, Matsumoto Y, Okamoto F, et al. Corneal higher-order aberrations induced by overnight orthokeratology. Am J Ophthalmol 2005;139:429-436.
10. Miller JM, Anwaruddin R, Straub J, et al. Higher order aberrations in normal, dilated, intraocular lens, and laser in situ keratomileusis corneas. J Refract Surg 2002;18:S579-S583.
11. Thibos LN, Applegate RA, Schwiegerling JT, et al. Standards for reporting the optical aberrations of eyes. J Refract Surg 2002;18:S652-S660.
12. Stillitano I, Chalita MR, Schor P, et al. Corneal changes and wavefront analysis on orthokeratology fitting test. Am J Ophthalmol 2007;144:378-386.
13. Alharbi A, Swarbrick HA. The effects of overnight orthokeratology lens wear on corneal thickness. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44:2518-2523.
14. Soni PS, Nguyen TT, Bonanno JA. Overnight orthokeratology: Refractive and corneal recovery after discontinuation of reverse-geometry lenses. Eye Contact Lens 2004;30:254-262.
15. Owens H, Garner LF, Craig JP, et al. Posterior corneal changes with orthokeratology. Optom Vis Sci 2004;81:421-426.
16. Yang X, Gong XM, Dai ZY, et al. Topographical evaluation on decentration of orthokeratology lenses. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi 2003;39:335-338.
17. Mountford JA, Noack D. Corneal topography and orthokeratology: Post wear assessment. Contact Lens Spectrum 2002;17:36-45.
18. Bailey IL, Bullimore MA, Raasch TW, et al. Clinical grading and the effects of scaling. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1991;32:422-432.
19. Applegate RA, Marsack JD, Ramos R, Sarver EJ. Interaction between abberrations to improve or reduce visual performance. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003;29:1487-1495.
20. Tang W. The relationship between corneal topography and visual performance [Ph.D. thesis]. Brisbane, Australia: Queensland University of Technology; 2001.
21. Lui WO, Edwards MH. Orthokeratology in low myopia. Part 2: Corneal topographic changes and safety over 100 days. Contact Lens Anterior Eye 2000;23:90-99.
22. Applegate RA, Sarver EJ, Khemsara V. Are all aberrations equal? J Refract Surg 2002;18:S556-S562.