Feedback during cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 200-203

  Bohn, Andreas ^a   Gude, Philipp ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL MÜNSTER   (Germany)

^b KLINIKUM STUTTGART   (Germany)

Author keywords

Automated external defibrillator; Basic life support; Cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality; Feedback; Human factor

Indexed keywords

BLOOD FLOW; COMPRESSION; DEFIBRILLATION; ELECTROCARDIOGRAM; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HEART ARREST; HEART MASSAGE; HUMAN; LUNG VENTILATION; NONHUMAN; OXYGENATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESUSCITATION; REVIEW; THORAX COMPRESSION; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; STANDARD;

CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEEDBACK; HUMANS; RESPIRATION, ARTIFICIAL;

EID: 43249083027     PISSN: 09527907     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e3282f63f12     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. American Heart Association 2005 guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation 2005; 112 (24 Suppl).
2. European Resuscitation Council guidelines for resuscitation 2005. Resuscitation 2005; 67 (Suppl).
3. Wik L, Hansen TB, Fylling F, et al. Delaying defibrillation to give basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation to patients with out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation: a randomized trial. JAMA 2003; 289:1389-1395.
4. Edelson DP, Abella BS, Kramer-Johansen J, et al. Effects of compression depth and preshock pauses predict defibrillation failure during cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2006; 71:137-145.
5. This article describes the importance of keeping CPR pauses prior to defibrillation as short as possible.
6. Eftestol T, Sunde K, Steen PA. Effects of interrupting precordial compressions on the calculated probability of defibrillation success during out-ofhospital cardiac arrest. Circulation 2002; 105:2270-2273.
7. Berg RA, Sanders AB, Kern KB, et al. Adverse hemodynamic effects of interrupting chest compressions for rescue breathing during cardiopulmonary resuscitation for ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest. Circulation 2001; 104: 2465-2470.
8. Andreka P, Frenneaux MP. Hemodynamics of cardiac arrest and resuscitation. Curr Opin Crit Care 2006; 12:198-203.
9. This review offers an excellent overview of circulatory physiology in CPR.
10. Wik L, Kramer-Johansen J, Myklebust H, et al. Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. JAMA 2005; 293:299-304.
11. Rittenberger JC, Guimond G, Platt TE, et al. Quality of BLS decreases with increasing resuscitation complexity. Resuscitation 2006; 68:365-369. The results of this study show that in complex CPR scenarios rescuers are often overstrained.
12. Goh J, Wiegmann D. Human factors analysis of accidents involving visual flight rules flight into adverse weather. Aviat Space Environ Med 2002; 73:817-822.
13. Kramer-Johansen J, Myklebust H, Wik L, et al. Quality of out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation with real time automated feedback: a prospective interventional study. Resuscitation 2006; 71:283-292.
14. By real-time feedback the quality of CPR can be improved in out-of-hospital resuscitation.
15. Abella BS, Sandbo N, Vassilatos P, et al. Chest compression rates during cardiopulmonary resuscitation are suboptimal: a prospective study during inhospital cardiac arrest. Circulation 2005; 111:428-434.
16. Abella BS, Alvarado JP, Myklebust H, et al. Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during in-hospital cardiac arrest. JAMA 2005; 293:305-310.
17. Kern KB, Sanders AB, RaifeJ, et al. A study of chest compression rates during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in humans: the importance of rate-directed chest compressions. Arch Intern Med 1992; 52:145-149.
18. Wik L, Thowsen J, Steen PA. An automated voice advisory manikin system for training in basic life support without an instructor: a novel approach to CPR training. Resuscitation 2001; 50:167-172.
19. Elding C, Baskett P, Hughes A. The study of the effectiveness of chest compressions using the CPR-plus. Resuscitation 1998; 36:169-173.
20. Handley AJ, Handley SA. Improving CPR performance using an audible feedback system suitable for incorporation into an automated external defibrillator. Resuscitation 2003; 57:57-62.
21. Miller SG, Elkadi HS, Elghazzawi Z, Brewer J. Lay rescuer adherence to the chain of survival: a comparison of four automated external defibrillators [abstract]. Prehosp Emerg Care 2004; 8:91.
22. Aufderheide TP, Sigurdsson G, Pirrallo RG, et al. Hyperventilation-induced hypotension during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Circulation 2004; 109:1-6.
23. Kramer-Johansen J, Edelson DP, Abella BS, et al. Pauses in chest compres-sion and inappropriate shocks: a comparison of manual and semi-automatic defibrillation attempts. Resuscitation 2007; 73:212-220.
24. Showing the difficulty of correctly timing and interpreting an ECG during resuscitation, this trial is an important contribution to the field of feedback studies.
25. Wik L, Myklebust H, Auestad BH, et al. Retention of basic life support skills 6 months after training with an automated voice advisory manikin system without instructor involvement. Resuscitation 2002; 52:273-279.
26. Wik L, Myklebust H, Auestad BH, et al. Twelve-month retention of CPR skills with automatic correcting verbal feedback. Resuscitation 2005; 66: 27-30.
27. Chiang W, Chen W, Chen S, et al. Better adherence to the guidelines during cardiopulmonary resuscitation through the provision of audio-prompts. Resuscitation 2005; 64:297-301.
28. Abella BS, Edelson DP, Kim S, et al. CPR quality improvement during in-hospital cardiac arrest using a real-time audiovisual feedback system. Resuscitation 2007; 73:54-61.
29. This in-hospital study showed moderate improvement of CPR quality by feedback introduction.
30. Olasveengen TM, Tomlinson AE, Wik L, et al. A failed attempt to improve quality of out-of-hospital CPR through performance evaluation. Prehosp Emerg Care 2007; 11:427-433.
31. An important study showing that transfer of simulator studies to out-of-hospital resuscitation is a challenge.