Beyond data: The aim and practice of archaeology

South African Archaeological Bulletin

Volumn 59, Issue 180, 2004, Pages 66-69

  Huffman, Thomas N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE WITWATERSRAND   (South Africa)

Author keywords

Cognitive archaeology; Post Processualism; Processualism; Science; Theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 43149115251     PISSN: 00381969     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3889245     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Beach, D.N. 1997. Review of Snakes & Crocodiles. South African Archaeological Bulletin 52: 125-127
2. Bintliff, J. 1993. Why Indiana Jones is smarter than the Post-Processualists. Norwegian Archaeological Review 26: 91-100
3. Chalmers, A. 1990. Science and its fabrication. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press
4. rd ed. London: Macmillan
5. Davison, D. 1963. Actions, reasons and causes. Journal of Philosophy 60: 685-700
6. Feyerabend, P.K. 1975. Against method: outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge. London: NLB
7. Hempel, C.G. 1965. Aspects of scientific explanation and other essays in the philosophy of science. New York: Free Press
8. Huffman, T.N. 1986. Cognitive studies of the Iron Age in Southern Africa. World Archaeology 18: 84-95
9. Kuhn, T.S. 1967. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
10. Laudan, L. 1996. Beyond Positivism and Relativism: theory, method and evidence. Boulder: Westview Press
11. Popper, K.R. 1963. Conjectures and refutations. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul
12. Renfrew, C. 1982. Towards an archaeology of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
13. rd ed.). Boston: McGraw Hill