Glycosylation of S-RNases may influence pollen rejection thresholds in Solanum chacoense

Journal of Experimental Botany

Volumn 59, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 545-552

  Liu, Bolin ^a   Morse, David ^a   Cappadocia, Mario ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Gametophytic self incompatibility; Glycosylation; Pistil by pistil analysis; S RNase; Solanum chacoense; Threshold

Indexed keywords

RIBONUCLEASE;

ARTICLE; ENZYMOLOGY; FLOWER; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; GLYCOSYLATION; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; POLLEN; POLLINATION; SOLANUM;

FLOWERS; GENOTYPE; GLYCOSYLATION; POLLEN; POLLINATION; RIBONUCLEASES; SOLANUM;

SOLANUM; SOLANUM CHACOENSE;

EID: 43149107922     PISSN: 00220957     EISSN: 14602431     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erm339     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bai C, Sen P, Hofmann K, Ma L, Goebl M, Harper JW, Elledge SJ. 1996. SKP1 connects cell cycle regulators to the ubiquitin proteolysis machinery through a novel motif, the F-box. Cell 86, 263-274.
2. Broothaerts W, Vanvinckenroye P, Decock B, Van Damme J, Vendrig J. 1991. Petunia hybrida S-proteins: ribonuclease activity and the role of their glycan side chains in self incompatibility. Sexual Plant Reproduction 4, 258-266.
3. Clark KR, Okuley JJ, Collins PD, Sims TL. 1990. Sequence variability and developmental expression of S-alleles in self-incompatible and pseudo-self-compatible petunia. The Plant Cell 2, 815-826.
4. Cruz-Garcia F, Hancock CN, Kim D, McClure B. 2005. Stylar glycoproteins bind to S-RNase in vitro. The Plant Journal 42, 295-304.
5. de Nettancourt D. 1977. Incompatibility in Angiosperms. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
6. Goldraij A, Kondo K, Lee CB, Hancock CN, Sivaguru M, Vazquez-Santana S, Kim S, Phillips TE, Cruz-Garcia F, McClure B. 2006. Compartmentalization of S-RNase and HT-B degradation in self-incompatible Nicotiana. Nature 439, 805-810.
7. Hancock CN, Kent L, McClure B. 2005. The stylar 120 kDa glycoprotein is required for S-specific pollen rejection in Nicotiana. The Plant Journal 43, 716-723.
8. Hiratsuka S, Zhang S. 2002. Relationship between fruit set, pollen tube growth, and S-RNase concentration in the self-incompatible Japanese pear. Scientia Horticulturae 95, 309-318.
9. Hua Z, Kao TH. 2006. Identification and characterization of components of a putative petunia S-locus F-box-containing E3 ligase complex involved in S-RNase-based self-incompatibility. The Plant Cell 18, 2531-2553.
10. Huang S, Lee H-S, Karunanandaa B, Kao TH. 1994. Ribonuclease activity of Petunia inflata S proteins is essential for rejection of self pollen. The Plant Cell 6, 1021-1028.
11. Ishimizu T, Shinkawa T, Sakiyama F, Norioka S. 1998. Primary structural features of rosaceous S-RNases associated with gametophytic self-incompatibility. Plant Molecular Biology 37, 931-941.
12. Kao TH, Tsukamoto T. 2004. The molecular and genetic bases of S-RNase-based self-incompatibility. The Plant Cell 16, S72-S83.
13. Karunanandaa B, Huang S, Kao T. 1994. Carbohydrate moiety of the Petunia inflata S3 protein is not required for self-incompatibility interactions between pollen and pistil. The Plant Cell 6, 1933-1940.
14. Lee HS, Huang S, Kao T. 1994. S proteins control rejection of incompatible pollen in Petunia inflata. Nature 367, 560-563.
15. Luu D, Qin X, Morse D, Cappadocia M. 2000. S-RNase uptake by compatible pollen tubes in gametophytic self-incompatibility. Nature 407, 649-651.
16. Luu DT, Qin X, Laublin G, Yang Q, Morse D, Cappadocia M. 2001. Rejection of S-heteroallelic pollen by a dual-specific S-RNase in Solanum chacoense predicts a multimeric SI pollen component. Genetics 159, 329-335.
17. Matton DP, Luu DT, Xike Q, Laublin G, O'Brien M, Maes O, Morse D, Cappadocia M. 1999. Production of an S RNase with dual specificity suggests a novel hypothesis for the generation of new S alleles. The Plant Cell 11, 2087-2097.
18. Matton DP, Maes O, Laublin G, Xike Q, Bertrand C, Morse D, Cappadocia M. 1997. Hypervariable domains of self-incompatibility RNases mediate allele-specific pollen recognition. The Plant Cell 9, 1757-1766.
19. McClure B, Mou B, Canevascini S, Bernatzky R. 1999. A small asparagine-rich protein required for S-allele-specific pollen rejection in Nicotiana. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 96, 13548-13553.
20. McClure BA, Franklin-Tong V. 2006. Gametophytic self-incompatibility: understanding the cellular mechanisms involved in 'self' pollen tube inhibition. Planta 224, 233-245.
21. McClure BA, Haring V, Ebert PR, Anderson MA, Simpson RJ, Sakiyama F, Clarke AE. 1989. Style self-incompatibility gene products of Nicotiana alata are ribonucleases. Nature 342, 955-957.
22. McCubbin AG, Kao T. 2000. Molecular recognition and response in pollen and pistil interactions. Annual Review of Cell and Development Biology 16, 333-364.
23. Murfett J, Atherton TL, Mou B, Gasser CS, McClure BA. 1994. S-RNase expressed in transgenic Nicotiana causes S-allele-specific pollen rejection. Nature 367, 563-566.
24. Oxley D, Munro SL, Craik DJ, Bacic A. 1998. Structure and distribution of N-glycans on the S7-allele stylar self- incompatibility ribonuclease of Nicotiana alata. Journal of Biochemistry (Tokyo) 123, 978-983.
25. Qin X, Liu B, Soulard J, Morse D, Cappadocia M. 2006. Style-by-style analysis of two sporadic self-compatible Solanum chacoense lines supports a primary role for S-RNases in determining pollen rejection thresholds. Journal of Experimental Botany 57, 2001-2013.
26. Qin X, Luu D, Yang Q, Maes O, Matton D, Morse D, Cappadocia M. 2001. Genotype-dependent differences in S12-RNase expression lead to sporadic self-compatibility in Solanum chacoense. Plant and Molecular Biology 45, 295-305.
27. Qin X, Soulard J, Laublin G, Morse D, Cappadocia M. 2005. Molecular analysis of the conserved C4 region of the S11-RNase of Solanum chacoense. Planta 221, 531-537.
28. Richman A, Kohn J. 1996. Learning from rejection: the evolutionary biology of single locus incompatibility. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11, 497-502.
29. Singh A, Kao TH. 1992. Gametophytic self-incompatibility: biochemical, molecular genetic, and evolutionary aspects. International Review of Cytology 140, 449-483.