Comparison of input signals in subspace identification of multivariable ill-conditioned systems

Journal of Process Control

Volumn 18, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 582-593

  Micchi, Andrea ^a   Pannocchia, Gabriele ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PISA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Ill conditioned systems; Input design; Model predictive control; Subspace identification

Indexed keywords

FREQUENCY RESPONSE; MULTIVARIABLE SYSTEMS; RANDOM PROCESSES; VECTORS;

ILL CONDITIONED SYSTEMS; INPUT DESIGNS; RANDOM SIGNALS; SUBSPACE IDENTIFICATION;

IDENTIFICATION (CONTROL SYSTEMS);

EID: 43149105987     PISSN: 09591524     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprocont.2007.10.003     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Ljung L. System Identification: Theory For The User (1999), Prentice & Hall
2. Van Overschee P., and De Moor B. N4SID: Subspace algorithms for the identification of combined deterministic stochastic systems. Automatica 30 (1994) 75-93
3. Verhaegen M. Identification of the deterministic part of MIMO state space models given in innovation form from input-output data. Automatica 30 (1994) 61-74
4. Van Overschee P., and De Moor B. A unifying theorem for three subspace system identification algorithms. Automatica 31 (1995) 1853-1864
5. W.E. Larimore, Automated and optimal system identification by canonical variables, in: American Control Conference, Baltimore, MD, vol. 2, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 1994, pp. 1640-1644.
6. Wang J., and Qin S.J. A new subspace identification approach based on principal component analysis. J. Proc. Cont. 12 (2002) 841-855
7. Huang B., Ding S.X., and Qin S.J. Closed-loop subspace identification: an orthogonal projection approach. J. Proc. Cont. 15 (2005) 53-66
8. Zhu Y. Multivariable process identification for MPC: the asymptotic method and its applications. J. Proc. Cont. 8 2 (1998) 101-115
9. Gevers M., and Ljung L. Optimal experiment designs with respect to the intended model application. Automatica 22 (1986) 543-554
10. Koung C.W., and MacGregor J.F. Design of identification experiments for robust control. A geometric approach for bivariate processes. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 32 (1993) 1658-1666
11. Koung C.W., and MacGregor J.F. Identification for robust multivariable control: the design of experiments. Automatica 30 (1994) 1541-1554
12. Hjalmarsson H., Gevers M., and de Bruyne F. For model-based control design, closed-loop identification gives better performance. Automatica 32 (1996) 1659-1673
13. Zhu Y. Multivariable System Identification for Process Control (2001), Elsevier Science
14. Skogestad S., and Morari M. Implications of large RGA-elements on control performance. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 26 (1987) 2323-2330
15. Pannocchia G. Robust disturbance modeling for model predictive control with application to multivariable ill-conditioned processes. J. Proc. Cont. 13 (2003) 693-701
16. Jacobsen E.W., and Skogestad S. Inconsistencies in dynamic models for ill-conditioned plants: Application to low-order models of distillation columns. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 33 (1994) 631-640
17. Häggblom K.E., and Böling J.M. Multimodel identification for control of an ill-conditioned distillation column. J. Proc. Cont. 8 2 (1998) 209-218
18. Chiuso A., and Picci G. On the ill-conditioning of subspace identification with inputs. Automatica 40 (2004) 575-589
19. Misra P., and Nikolaou M. Input design for model order determination in subspace identification. AIChE J. 49 8 (2003) 2124-2132
20. Conner J.S., and Seborg D.E. An evaluation of MIMO input designs for process identification. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 43 (2004) 3847-3854
21. P. Stec, Y. Zhu, Some study on identification of ill-conditioned processes for control, in: Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Arlington, VA, USA, 2001, pp. 1202-1207.
22. Cooley B.L., and Lee J.H. Control-relevant experiment design for multivariable systems described by expansions in orthonormal bases. Automatica 37 (2001) 273-281
23. R.B. Gopaluni, R.S. Patwardhan, S.L. Shah, Experiment design for MPC relevant identification, in: Proceedings of American Control Conference, Anchorage, AK, USA, 2002, pp. 2713-2718.
24. Zhu Y., and Stec P. Simple control-relevant identification test methods for a class of ill-conditioned processes. J. Proc. Cont. 16 (2006) 1113-1120
25. Hjalmarsson H. From experiment design to closed-loop control. Automatica 41 (2005) 393-438
26. Bruwer M.J., and MacGregor J.F. Robust multi-variable identification: optimal experimental design with constraints. J. Proc. Cont. 16 (2006) 581-600
27. Zhan Q., Li T., and Georgakis C. Steady state optimal test signal design for multivariable model based control. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 45 (2006) 8514-8527
28. Qin S.J., Lin W., and Ljung L. A novel subspace identification approach with enforced causal models. Automatica 41 (2005) 2043-2053
29. G. Pannocchia, A. Micchi, R. Bulleri, A. Brambilla, G. Marchetti, Multivariable subspace identification and predictive control of a heat-integrated superfractionator rigorous model, in: Proceedings of the ADCHEM 2006 International Symposium on Advanced Control of Chemical Process, vol. I, Gramado, Brazil, 2006, pp. 421-426.
30. Ljung L., and McKelvey T. Subspace identification from closed-loop data. Signal Process. 52 (1996) 209-215
31. Pannocchia G., and Rawlings J.B. Disturbance models for offset-free model predictive control. AIChE J. 49 (2003) 426-437
32. Skogestad S., and Morari M. LV-control of a high purity distillation column. Chem. Eng. Sci. 43 (1988) 33-48