Inter- and intra-observer reliability of radiographic scores commonly used for the evaluation of haemophilic arthropathy

Haemophilia

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 504-512

  Silva, Mauricio ^a   Luck, J V ^a   Quon, D ^a   Young, C R ^a   Chin, D M ^a   Ebramzadeh, E ^a   Fong, Y J ^a  

^a JOINT REPLACEMENT INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTHROPATHY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; DISEASE COURSE; DISEASE SEVERITY; HEMOPHILIA; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; INTRARATER RELIABILITY; JOINT RADIOGRAPHY; OBSERVER VARIATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

DISEASE PROGRESSION; HEMARTHROSIS; HEMOPHILIA A; HUMANS; JOINT DISEASES; JOINTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

EID: 43149104164     PISSN: 13518216     EISSN: 13652516     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2007.01630.x     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Arnold WD, Hilgartner MW. Hemophilic arthropathy. Current concepts of pathogenesis and management. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1977; 59: 287-305.
2. Luck JV, Silva M, Rodriguez-Merchan EC, Ghalambor N, Zahiri CA, Finn RS. Hemophilic arthropathy: Evaluation and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2004; 12: 234-45.
3. Pettersson H, Ahlberg A, Nilsson IM. A radiologic classification of hemophilic arthropathy. Clin Orthop 1980; 149: 153-9.
4. Greene WB, Yankaskas BC, Guilford WB. Roentgenographic classifications of hemophilic arthropathy. Comparison of three systems and correlation with clinical parameters. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1989; 71: 237-44.
5. Engh CA Jr, Sychterz CJ, Young AM, Pollock DC, Toomey SD, Engh CA Sr. Interobserver and intraobserver variability in radiographic assessment of osteolysis. J Arthroplasty 2002; 17: 752-9.
6. Manco-Johnson MJ, Pettersson H, Petrini P et al. Physical therapy and imaging outcome measures in a haemophilia population treated with factor prophylaxis: Current status and future directions. Haemophilia 2004; 10(Suppl. 4): 88-93.
7. Funk M, Schmidt H, Escuriola-Ettingshausen C et al. Radiological and orthopedic score in pediatric hemophilic patients with early and late prophylaxis. Ann Hematol 1998; 77: 171-4.
8. Pergantou H, Matsinos G, Papadopoulos A, Platokouki H, Aronis S. Comparative study of validity of clinical, X-ray and magnetic resonance imaging scores in evaluation and management of haemophilic arthropathy in children. Haemophilia 2006; 12: 241-7.
9. Nuss R, Kilcoyne RF, Rivard GE, Murphy J. Late clinical, plain X-ray and magnetic resonance imaging findings in haemophilic joints treated with radiosynoviorthesis. Haemophilia 2000; 6: 658-63.
10. Pettersson H, Nilsson IM, Hedner U, Norehn K, Ahlberg A. Radiologic evaluation of prophylaxis in severe haemophilia. Acta Paediatr Scand 1981; 70: 565-70.
11. Erlemann R, Rosenthal H, Walthers EM, Almeida P, Calleja R. Reproducibility of the pettersson scoring system. An interobserver study. Acta Radiol 1989; 30: 147-51.