Radiographic predictors of residual low back pain after laminectomy for lumbar spinal canal stenosis: Minimum 5-year follow-up

Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 153-158

  Xia, Yingpeng ^a,b   Ishii, Ken ^a   Matsumoto, Morio ^a   Nakamura, Masaya ^a   Toyama, Yoshiaki ^a   Chiba, Kazuhiro ^a  

^a KEIO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b Tianjin Union Medical Centre   (China)

Author keywords

Laminectomy; Low back pain; Lumbar spinal canal stenosis; Radiographic predictors

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONVALESCENCE; DISEASE DURATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LAMINECTOMY; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; LORDOSIS; LOW BACK PAIN; MALE; MEDICAL PARAMETERS; PATIENT CODING; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREDICTOR VARIABLE; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANGE OF MOTION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCORING SYSTEM; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; SURGICAL PATIENT; SYMPTOM; VERTEBRAL CANAL STENOSIS;

AGED; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; FORECASTING; HUMANS; LAMINECTOMY; LOW BACK PAIN; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPINAL STENOSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 43149087768     PISSN: 15360652     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318074dded     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Katz JN, Lipson SJ, Brick GW, et al. Clinical correlates of patient satisfaction after laminectomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine. 1995;20:1155-1160.
2. Katz JN, Stucki G, Lipson SJ, et al. Predictors of surgical outcome in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine. 1999;24:2229-2233.
3. Manchikanti L, Singh V, Kloth D, et al. Interventional techniques in the management of chronic pain: part 2.0. Pain Physician. 2001;4:24-98.
4. Manchikanti L, Pampati V, Baha AG, et al. Contribution of facet joints to chronic low back pain in postlumbar laminectomy syndrome: a controlled comparative prevalence evaluation. Pain Physician. 2001;4:175-180.
5. Datta G, Gnanalingham KK, Peterson D, et al. Back pain and disability after lumbar laminectomy: is there a relationship to muscle retraction? Neurosurgery. 2004;54:1413-1420; discussion 20.
6. Fager CA, Freidberg SR. Analysis of failures and poor results of lumbar spine surgery. Spine. 1980;5:87-94.
7. Fritsch EW, Heisel J, Rupp S. The failed back surgery syndrome: reasons, intraoperative findings, and long-term results: a report of 182 operative treatments. Spine. 1996;21:626-633.
8. Guyer RD, Patterson M, Ohnmeiss DD. Failed back surgery syndrome: diagnostic evaluation. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006;14:534-543.
9. Lazennec JY, Ramare S, Arafati N, et al. Sagittal alignment in lumbosacral fusion: relations between radiological parameters and pain. Eur Spine J. 2000;9:47-55.
10. Peterson MD, Nelson LM, McManus AC, et al. The effect of operative position on lumbar lordosis. A radiographic study of patients under anesthesia in the prone and 90-90 positions. Spine. 1995;20:1419-1424.
11. Tan SB, Kozak JA, Dickson JH, et al. Effect of operative position on sagittal alignment of the lumbar spine. Spine. 1994;19:314-318.
12. Chiba K, Toyama Y, Matsumoto M, et al. Intraspinal cyst communicating with the intervertebral disc in the lumbar spine: discal cyst. Spine. 2001;26:2112-2118.
13. Hicks GE, George SZ, Nevitt MA, et al. Measurement of lumbar lordosis: inter-rater reliability, minimum detectable change and longitudinal variation. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2006;19:501-506.
14. Kanayama M, Hashimoto T, Shigenobu K, et al. Intraoperative biomechanical assessment of lumbar spinal instability: validation of radiographic parameters indicating anterior column support in lumbar spinal fusion. Spine. 2003;28:2368-2372.
15. Iguchi T, Kurihara A, Nakayama J, et al. Minimum 10-year outcome of decompressive laminectomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine. 2000;25:1754-1759.
16. Graver V, Haaland AK, Magnaes B, et al. Seven-year clinical follow-up after lumbar disc surgery: results and predictors of outcome. Br J Neurosurg. 1999;13:178-184.
17. Trief PM, Grant W, Fredrickson B. A prospective study of psychological predictors of lumbar surgery outcome. Spine. 2000;25:2616-2621.
18. Jonsson B, Annertz M, Sjoberg C, et al. A prospective and consecutive study of surgically treated lumbar spinal stenosis. Part I: clinical features related to radiographic findings. Spine. 1997;22:2932-2937.
19. Luk KD, Chow DH, Holmes A. Vertical instability in spondylolisthesis: a traction radiographic assessment technique and the principle of management. Spine. 2003;28:819-827.
20. Vialle R, Levassor N, Rillardon L, et al. Radiographic analysis of the sagittal alignment and balance of the spine in asymptomatic subjects. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:260-267.
21. Thomas NW, Rea GL, Pikul BK, et al. Quantitative outcome and radiographic comparisons between laminectomy and laminotomy in the treatment of acquired lumbar stenosis. Neurosurgery. 1997;41:567-574; discussion 74-75.
22. Kumar MN, Baklanov A, Chopin D. Correlation between sagittal plane changes and adjacent segment degeneration following lumbar spine fusion. Eur Spine J. 2001;10:314-319.
23. Legaye J, Duval-Beaupere G, Hecquet J, et al. Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves. Eur Spine J. 1998;7:99-103.
24. Harrison DD, Cailliet R, Janik TJ, et al. Elliptical modeling of the sagittal lumbar lordosis and segmental rotation angles as a method to discriminate between normal and low back pain subjects. J Spinal Disord. 1998;11:430-439.
25. Jackson RP, Peterson MD, McManus AC, et al. Compensatory spinopelvic balance over the hip axis and better reliability in measuring lordosis to the pelvic radius on standing lateral radiographs of adult volunteers and patients. Spine. 1998;23:1750-1767.