Effects of sowing date and growth duration on growth and yield of groundnut in a Mediterranean-type environment in Turkey

Field Crops Research

Volumn 105, Issue 1-2, 2008, Pages 131-140

  Caliskan, S ^a   Caliskan, M E ^a   Arslan, M ^a   Arioglu, H ^b  

^a MUSTAFA KEMAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b CUKUROVA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Earliness; Groundnut; Mediterranean climate; Radiation; Temperature

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS; CLIMATE CHANGE; CULTIVATION; GROWTH KINETICS; PLANTS (BOTANY);

GROUNDNUT PLANTS; GROUNDNUTS; MEDITERRANEAN CLIMATE; SOWING DATES;

CROPS;

CLIMATE EFFECT; CROP PRODUCTION; CROP YIELD; CULTIVAR; EMERGENCE; ENVIRONMENTAL STRESS; FIELDWORK; GROUNDNUT; GROWTH RATE; HARVESTING; MEDITERRANEAN ENVIRONMENT; OIL; PHENOLOGY; PROTEIN; SOLAR RADIATION; SOWING DATE; TEMPERATURE EFFECT; YIELD RESPONSE;

EURASIA; HATAY; TURKEY;

ARACHIS HYPOGAEA;

EID: 43049183275     PISSN: 03784290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2007.08.007     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Anonymous. Keys to Soil Taxonomy. 8th ed. (1998), Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington, DC p. 326
2. Awal M.A., and Ikeda T. Effects of changes in soil temperature on seedling emergence and phenological development in field-grown stands of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Environ. Exp. Bot. 47 (2002) 101-113
3. Bagnall D.J., and King R.W. Response of peanut (Arachis hypogaea) to temperature, photoperiod and irradiance. 1. Effect on flowering. Field Crops Res. 26 (1991) 263-277
4. Bagnall D.J., and King R.W. Response of peanut (Arachis hypogaea) to temperature, photoperiod and irradiance. 2. Effect on peg and pod development. Field Crops Res. 26 (1991) 279-293
5. Banterng P., Patanothai A., Pannangpetch K., Jogloy S., and Hoogenboom G. Seasonal variation in the dynamic growth and development traits of peanut lines. J. Agric. Sci. (Camb.) 141 (2003) 51-62
6. Bell M.J. Effect of sowing date on growth and development of irrigated peanuts, Arachis hypogaea L. cv. Early Bunch, in a monsoonal tropical environment. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 37 (1986) 361-373
7. Bell M.J., and Wright G.C. Groundnut growth and development in contrasting environments. 1. Growth and plant density. Exp. Agric. 34 (1998) 99-112
8. Boote K.J. Growth stages of peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Peanut Sci. 20 (1982) 1-5
9. Caliskan, S., Caliskan, M.E., Erturk, E., Arslan, M., Arioglu, H., in press. Growth and development of Virginia-type groundnut cultivars under Mediterranean conditions. Acta Agric. Scan. B: Plant Soil Sci., doi:10.1080/09064710701312041.
10. Craufurd P.Q., Prasad P.V.V., and Summerfield R.J. Dry matter production and rate of change of harvest index at high temperature in peanut. Crop Sci. 42 (2002) 146-151
11. FAO, 2007. FAO Statistical Databases. Available at http://faostat.fao.org/site/567/DesktopDefault.aspx?PageID=567.
12. FAO/UNESCO. Soil map of the world, Scale: 1:5000,000 (1974), World Soil Resources Report 59, Rome (vol. 1, legend)
13. Gardner F.P., and Auma E.O. Canopy structure, light interception, and yield and market quality of peanut genotypes as influenced by planting pattern and planting date. Field Crops Res. 20 (1989) 13-29
14. Ghosh P.K., Dayal D., Bandyopadhyay K.K., and Mohanty M. Evaluation of straw and polythene mulch for enhancing productivity of irrigated summer groundnut. Field Crops Res. 99 (2006) 76-86
15. Ishag H.M. Phenotypic and yield response of irrigated groundnut cultivars in a hot environment. Exp. Agric. 36 (2000) 303-312
16. Jordan D.L., Spears J.F., and Sullivan G.A. Influence of digging date on yield and gross return of Virginia-type peanut cultivars in North Carolina. Peanut Sci. 25 (1998) 45-50
17. Jordan D.L., Barnes J.S., Bogle C.R., Brandenburg R.L., Bailey J.E., Johnson P.D., and Culpepper A. Groundnut response to cultivar selection, digging date and tillage intensity. Agron. J. 95 (2003) 380-385
18. Ketring D.L. Temperature effects on vegetative and reproductive development of peanut. Crop Sci. 24 (1984) 877-882
19. Leong S.K., and Ong C.K. The influence of temperature and soil water deficit on the development and morphology of peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L.). J. Exp. Bot. 34 (1983) 1551-1561
20. Mozingo R.W., Coffelt T.A., and Wright F.S. The influence of planting and digging dates on yield, value, and grade of four Virginia-type peanut cultivars. Groundnut Sci. 18 (1991) 55-63
21. Nigam S.R., Rao R.C.N., and Wynne J.C. Effects of temperature and photoperiod on vegetative and reproductive growth of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). J. Agron. Crop Sci. 181 (1998) 117-124
22. Ntare B.R., Williams J.H., and Ndunguru B.J. Effects of seasonal variation in temperature and cultivar on yield and yield determination of irrigated groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) during the dry season in the Sahel of West Africa. J. Agric. Sci. (Camb.) 131 (1998) 439-448
23. Poggio S.L., Satorre E.H., Dethiou S., and Gonzalo G.M. Pod and seed numbers as a function of photothermal quotient during the seed set period of field pea (Pisum sativum) crops. Eur. J. Agron. 22 (2005) 55-69
24. Prasad P.V.V., Craufurd P.Q., and Summerfield R.J. Effect of high air and soil temperature on dry matter production, pod yield and yield components of groundnut. Plant Soil 222 (2000) 231-239
25. Prasad P.V.V., Craufurd P.Q., Kakani V.G., Wheeler T.R., and Boote K.J. Influence of temperature during pre- and post-anthesis stages of floral development on fruit-set and pollen germination in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 28 (2001) 233-240
26. Prasad P.V.V., Boote K.J., Thomas J.M.G., Allen L.H., and Gorbet D.W. Influence of soil temperature on seedling emergence and early growth of peanut cultivars in field conditions. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 192 (2006) 168-177
27. SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT Software: Chances and Enhancements Through Release 6.11 (1996), SAS Inst. Inc., Carry, NC, USA
28. Subrahmaniyan K., Kalaiselvan P., Balasubramanian T.N., and Zhou W. Crop productivity and soil properties as affected by polyethylene film mulch and land configurations in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea). Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 52 (2006) 79-103