Wastewater treatment in a hybrid activated sludge baffled reactor

Journal of Hazardous Materials

Volumn 154, Issue 1-3, 2008, Pages 550-557

  Tizghadam, Mostafa ^a   Dagot, Christophe ^a   Baudu, Michel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIMOGES   (France)

Author keywords

Activated sludge; Biofilm; Hybrid activated sludge baffled reactor; Wastewater treatment

Indexed keywords

ACTIVATED SLUDGE PROCESS; BIOFILMS; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; MIXING;

HYBRID ACTIVATED SLUDGE BAFFLED REACTOR; WASTEWATER CONCENTRATION;

WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

AMMONIA; NITROGEN;

ACTIVATED SLUDGE PROCESS; BIOFILMS; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; MIXING; WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

ACTIVATED SLUDGE; AERATION; AMMONIA; BIOFILM; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; DOMESTIC WASTE; FLOW PATTERN; NITROGEN; PLASTIC; POLLUTANT REMOVAL; WASTEWATER; WATER TREATMENT;

ACTIVATED SLUDGE; ARTICLE; BIOFILM; BIOMASS; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; HYDRODYNAMICS; NITRIFICATION; WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT;

BIOREACTORS; QUATERNARY AMMONIUM COMPOUNDS; SEWAGE; WASTE DISPOSAL, FLUID; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL;

EID: 43049164200     PISSN: 03043894     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.10.092     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Metcalf and Eddy Inc. Wastewater Engineering: Treatment, Disposal, Reuse (2003), McGraw-Hill, New York
2. Casellas M., Dagot C., and Baudu M. Set up and assessment of a control strategy in a SBR to enhance nitrogen and phosphorus removal. Process Biochem. 41 9 (2006) 1994-2001
3. Gonzalez S., Petrovic M., and Barcelo D. Removal of a broad range of surfactants from municipal wastewater-comparison between membrane bioreactor and conventional activated sludge treatment. Chemosphere 67 (2007) 335-343
4. Nicolella C., van Loosdrecht M.C.M., and Heijnen J.J. Wastewater treatment with particulate biofilm reactors. J. Biotechnol. 80 (2000) 1-33
5. Chaignon V., Lartiges B., Samrani A., and Mustin C. Evolution of size distribution and transfer of mineral particles between flocs in activated sludge: an insight into floc exchange dynamics. Water Res. 36 (2002) 676-684
6. Potier O., Leclerc J.P., and Pons M.N. Influence of geometrical and operational parameters on the axial dispersion in an aerated channel reactor. Water Res. 39 (2005) 4454-4462
7. Borroto J.I., Dominguez J., Griffith J., Fick M., and Leclerc J.P. Technetium-99m as a tracer for the liquid RTD measurement in opaque anaerobic digester: application in a sugar wastewater plant. Chem. Eng. Process. 42 (2003) 857-865
8. Azimi A.A., and Zamanzadeh M. The effect of selectors and reactor configuration on filamentous sludge bulking control in activated sludge. Pakistan J. Biol. Sci. 9 3 (2006) 345-349
9. Sriwiriyarat T., and Randall C.W. Evaluation of integrated fixed film activated sludge wastewater treatment processes at high mean cell residence time and low temperatures. J. Environ. Eng. 131 11 (2005) 1550-1556
10. Sriwiriyarat T., and Randall C.W. Performance of IFAS wastewater treatment processes for biological phosphorus removal. Water Res. 39 16 (2005) 3873-3884
11. Al-Sharekh H.A., and Hamoda M.F. removal of organics from wastewater using a novel biological hybrid system. Water Sci. Technol. 43 1 (2001) 321-326
12. Su J.L., and Ouyang C.F. Nutrients removal using a combined process with activated sludge and fixed biofilm. Water Sci. Technol. 34 1 (1996) 477-486
13. Gebara 9F. Activated sludge biofilm wastewater treatment system. Water Res. 33 1 (1999) 230-238
14. Jianlong W., Hanchang S., and Yi Q. Wastewater treatment in hybrid biological reactor (HBR): effect of organic loading rates. Process Biochem. 36 (2000) 297-303
15. Münch E.V., Barr K., Watts S., and Keller J. Suspended carrier technology allows upgrading high-rate activated sludge plants for nitrogen removal via process intensification. Water Sci. Technol. 41 (2000) 5-12
16. Leclerc J.P., Detrez C., Bernaed A., and Schweich D. DTS: Un logiciel d'aide à l'élaboration de modèles d'écoulement dans les réacteurs. Revue de l'Institut Français du Pétrole 50 5 (1995) 641-656
17. APHA. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 19th ed. (1995), American Public Health Association, Baltimore, MD
18. Liu J.X., van Groenestijn J.W., Doddema H.J., and Wang B.Z. Removal of nitrogen and phosphorus using a new biofilm-activated sludge system. Water Sci. Technol. 34 1-2 (1996) 315-322
19. Aravinthan V., Takizawa S., Fujita K., and Komatsu K. Factors affecting nitrogen removal from domestic wastewater using immobilized bacteria. Water Sci. Technol. 38 (1998) 193-202
20. Hansen E., Zadura L., Frankowski S., and Wachowicz M. Upgrading of an activated sludge plant with floating biofilm carriers at Frantschach Swiecie S.A. to meet the new demands of year 2000. Water Sci. Technol. 40 11-12 (1999) 207-214
21. Wanner J., Kucman K., and Grau P. Activated sludge process combined with biofilm cultivation. Water Res. 22 2 (1988) 207-215
22. N. Roche, Influence de l'hydrodynamique du bassin d'aération sur la décantabilité des bous activées, Ph.D. Thesis, INPL, 1989.
23. Langenhoff A.A.M., Intrachandra N., and Stucky D.C. Treatment of dilute soluble and colloidal wastewater using anaerobic baffled reactor: influence of hydraulic retention time. Water Res. 34 4 (2000) 1307-1317
24. Andreottola G., Foladori P., Gatti G., Nardelli P., Pettena M., and Ragazzi M. Upgrading of a small overloaded activated sludge plant using a MBBR system. J. Environ. Sci. Health 10 (2003) 2317-2328
25. Li H., Yang M., Zhang Y., Gao M., and Kamagata Y. Comparison of nitrification performance and microbial community between submerged membrane bioreactor and conventional activated sludge system. Water Sci. Technol. 5 6-7 (2005) 193-200