Value of Vasodilator Stress Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Differential Diagnosis of Ischemic versus Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy

Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 425-432

  Mor Avi, Victor ^a   Koch, Rick ^a   Holper, Elizabeth M ^a   Goonewardena, Sascha ^a   Coon, Patrick D ^a   Min, James K ^a   Fedson, Savitri ^a   Ward, R Parker ^a   Lang, Roberto M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE; CONTRAST MEDIUM; GADOLINIUM;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ANGIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CARDIOMYOPATHY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTRAST ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; HEART MUSCLE ISCHEMIA; HEART PERFUSION; HUMAN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STRESS ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; VASODILATATION;

CARDIOMYOPATHIES; CONTRAST MEDIA; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; EXERCISE TEST; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL ISCHEMIA; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VASODILATOR AGENTS;

EID: 43049148310     PISSN: 08947317     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2007.10.034     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Klocke F.J., Baird M.G., Lorell B.H., Bateman T.M., Messer J.V., Berman D.S., et al. ACC/AHA/ASNC guidelines for the clinical use of cardiac radionuclide imaging-executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASNC Committee to Revise the 1995 Guidelines for the Clinical Use of Cardiac Radionuclide Imaging). J Am Coll Cardiol 42 (2003) 1318-1333
2. Sharp S.M., Sawada S.G., Segar D.S., Ryan T., Kovacs R., Fineberg N.S., et al. Dobutamine stress echocardiography: detection of coronary artery disease in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 24 (1994) 934-939
3. Leoncini M., Marcucci G., Sciagra R., Frascarelli F., Simonetti I., Bini L., et al. Prediction of functional recovery in patients with chronic coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction combining the evaluation of myocardial perfusion and of contractile reserve using nitrate-enhanced technetium-99m sestamibi gated single-photon emission computed tomography and dobutamine stress. Am J Cardiol 87 (2001) 1346-1350
4. Wei K., Jayaweera A.R., Firoozan S., Linka A., Skyba D.M., and Kaul S. Quantification of myocardial blood flow with ultrasound-induced destruction of microbubbles administered as a constant venous infusion. Circulation 97 (1998) 473-483
5. Masugata H., Peters B., Lafitte S., Strachan G.M., Ohmori K., and DeMaria A.N. Quantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion during graded coronary stenosis by real-time myocardial contrast echo refilling curves. J Am Coll Cardiol 37 (2001) 262-269
6. Lindner J.R., and Sklenar J. Placing faith in numbers: quantification of perfusion with myocardial contrast echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 43 (2004) 1814-1816
7. Tsutsui J.M., Xie F., McGrain A.C., Mahrous H., Hankins J., O'Leary E.L., et al. Comparison of low-mechanical index pulse sequence schemes for detecting myocardial perfusion abnormalities during vasodilator stress echocardiography. Am J Cardiol 95 (2005) 565-570
8. McCrohon J.A., Moon J.C., Prasad S.K., McKenna W.J., Lorenz C.H., Coats A.J., et al. Differentiation of heart failure related to dilated cardiomyopathy and coronary artery disease using gadolinium-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Circulation 108 (2003) 54-59
9. Moon J.C., McKenna W.J., McCrohon J.A., Elliott P.M., Smith G.C., and Pennell D.J. Toward clinical risk assessment in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with gadolinium cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Am Coll Cardiol 41 (2003) 1561-1567
10. Soriano C.J., Ridocci F., Estornell J., Jimenez J., Martinez V., and De Velasco J.A. Noninvasive diagnosis of coronary artery disease in patients with heart failure and systolic dysfunction of uncertain etiology, using late gadolinium-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Am Coll Cardiol 45 (2005) 743-748
11. Tsukiji M., Nguyen P., Narayan G., Hellinger J., Chan F., Herfkens R., et al. Peri-infarct ischemia determined by cardiovascular magnetic resonance evaluation of myocardial viability and stress perfusion predicts future cardiovascular events in patients with severe ischemic cardiomyopathy. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 8 (2006) 773-779
12. Malm S., Frigstad S., Torp H., Wiseth R., and Skjarpe T. Quantitative adenosine real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography for detection of angiographically significant coronary artery disease. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 19 (2006) 365-372
13. Mulvagh S.L. Advances in myocardial contrast echocardiography and the role of adenosine stress. Am J Cardiol 94 (2004) 12D-17D
14. Senior R., Janardhanan R., Jeetley P., and Burden L. Myocardial contrast echocardiography for distinguishing ischemic from nonischemic first-onset acute heart failure: insights into the mechanism of acute heart failure. Circulation 112 (2005) 1587-1593
15. Cerqueira M.D., Weissman N.J., Dilsizian V., Jacobs A.K., Kaul S., Laskey W.K., et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 105 (2002) 539-542
16. Parkka J.P., Niemi P., Saraste A., Koskenvuo J.W., Komu M., Oikonen V., et al. Comparison of MRI and positron emission tomography for measuring myocardial perfusion reserve in healthy humans. Magn Reson Med 55 (2006) 772-779
17. Muro T., Hozumi T., Watanabe H., Yamagishi H., Yoshiyama M., Takeuchi K., et al. Assessment of myocardial perfusion abnormalities by intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography with harmonic power Doppler imaging: comparison with positron emission tomography. Heart 89 (2003) 145-149
18. Dijkmans P.A., Knaapen P., Sieswerda G.T., Aiazian E., Visser C.A., Lammertsma A.A., et al. Quantification of myocardial perfusion using intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography in healthy volunteers: comparison with positron emission tomography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 19 (2006) 285-293
19. Keane D., Haase J., Slager C.J., Montauban van S.E., Lehmann K.G., Ozaki Y., et al. Comparative validation of quantitative coronary angiography systems. Results and implications from a multicenter study using a standardized approach. Circulation 91 (1995) 2174-2183
20. Bartunek J., Sys S.U., Heyndrickx G.R., Pijls N.H., and de B.B. Quantitative coronary angiography in predicting functional significance of stenoses in an unselected patient cohort. J Am Coll Cardiol 26 (1995) 328-334
21. Seissl H., Peukert K., Geiger B., and Verstraelen B.J. Quantitative coronary angiography: impact of imaging parameters on accuracy and confidence interval. Heart Vessels Suppl 12 (1997) 212-216
22. Isbell D.C., and Kramer C.M. Magnetic resonance for the assessment of myocardial viability. Curr Opin Cardiol 21 (2006) 469-472
23. Wiencek J.G., Feinstein S.B., Walker R., and Aronson S. Pitfalls in quantitative contrast echocardiography: the steps to quantitation of perfusion. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 6 (1993) 395-416