Determinants of compliance in a cluster randomised controlled trial on screening of breast and cervix cancer in Mumbai, India: 1. Compliance to screening

Oncology

Volumn 73, Issue 3-4, 2008, Pages 145-153

  Dinshaw, Ketayun ^a   Mishra, Gauravi ^a   Shastri, Surendra ^a   Badwe, Rajendra ^a   Kerkar, Rajendra ^a   Ramani, Subhash ^a   Thakur, Meenakshi ^a   Uplap, Pallavi ^a   Kakade, Anagha ^a   Gupta, Subhadra ^a   Ganesh, Balasubramanian ^a  

^a TATA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL   (India)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Cervix cancer; Compliance; Randomised controlled trial; Screening

Indexed keywords

ACETIC ACID;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST EXAMINATION; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY; CANCER RISK; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH EDUCATION; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; INDIA; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MORTALITY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RISK REDUCTION; SOCIAL STATUS; UNIVARIATE ANALYSIS; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; INDIA; INTERVENTION STUDIES; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 43049142657     PISSN: 00302414     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000126497     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Dinshaw KA: Addressing the cancer agenda: How have we measured up?; in Agarwal SP, Rao YN, Gupta S (eds): Fifty Years of Cancer Control in India. South Delhi, NCCP, DGHS, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, 2002, pp 14-21. http://mohfw.nic.in/pg14to21.pdf
2. Nandkumar A, Ramnath T, Roselind FS, Shobana B, Prabhu K: Two-Year Report of the Population Based Cancer Registries 1999-2000. Bangalore, National Cancer Registry Programme, Indian Council of Medical Research, 2005. http://www.icmr.nic.in/ncrp/1999-00/PBCR%20Report%201999_00.pdf
3. Sankaranarayanan R, Basu P, Ramani S, Wesley R, Cedric M, Keita N, Gombe CC, Sharma R, Dolo A, Shastri S, Nacoulma M, Nayama M, Somanathan T, Lucas E, Muwonge R, Frappart L, Parkin DM: Accuracy of visual screening for cervical neoplasia: results from an IARC multicentre study in India and Africa. Int J Cancer 2004;110:907-913.
4. University of Zimbabwe/JHPIEGO Cervical Cancer Project: Visual inspection with acetic acid for cervical cancer screening: test qualities in a primary-care setting. Lancet 1999;353:869-873.
5. Belinson JL, Pretorius RG, Zhang WH, Wu LY, Qiao YL, Elson P: Cervical cancer screening after simple visual inspection after acetic acid. Obstet Gynecol 2001;98:441-444.
6. Mittra I: Breast screening: the case for physical examination without mammography. Lancet 1994;343:342-344.
7. Miller AB, To T, Baines CJ, Wall C: The Canadian National Breast Screening Study. 2. 13-year results of a randomized trial in women aged 50-59 years. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92:1490-1499.
8. Basset AA: Physical examination of the breast and breast self-examination; in Miller AB (ed): Screening for Cancer. Orlando, Academic Press, 1985.
9. Sankaranarayan R, Wesley R: A Practical Manual on Visual Screening for Cervical Neoplasia. IARC Technical Publication No. 41. Lyon, IARC Press, 2003.
10. Sellors J, Sankaranarayanan R: Colposcopy and Treatment of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia: A Beginner's Manual. Lyon, IARC Press, 2003.
11. Elwood JM, Cox B, Richardson AK: The effectiveness of breast cancer screening by mammography in younger women. Online J Curr Clin Trials 1993;32.
12. Tornberg S, Kemetli L, Svane G, Rosen M, Stenbeck M, Nystrom L: Pattern of participation in a cohort aged 50-60 years at first invitation to the service-screening programme with mammography in Stockholm county, Sweden. Prev Med 2005;41:728-733.
13. Nene BM, Deshpande S, Jayant K, Budukh AM, Dale PS, Deshpande DA, Chiwate AS, Malvi SG, Deokar S, Parkin DM, Sankaranarayanan R: Early detection of cervical cancer by visual inspection: a population-based study in rural India. Int J Cancer 1996;68:770-773.
14. Sankaranarayanan R, Rajamanickam R, Arrossi S, Theresa R, Esmy PO, Mahe C, Muwonge R, Parkin DM, Cherian J: Determinants of participation of women in a cervical cancer visual screening trial in rural south India. Cancer Detect Prev 2003;27:457-465.
15. Sankaranarayanan R, Nene BM, Dinshaw KA, Cedric M, Jayant K, Shastri SS, Malvi SG, Chinoy R, Kelkar R, Budukh AM, Keskar V, Rajeshwarker R, Muwonge R, Kane S, Parkin DM: A cluster randomized controlled trial of visual, cytology and human papillomavirus screening for cancer of the cervix in rural India. Int J Cancer 2005;116:617-623.
16. Sankaranarayanan R, Nene BM, Dinshaw K, Rajkumar R, Shastri S, Wesley R, Basu P, Sharma R, Thara S, Budukh A, Parkin DM: Early detection of cervical cancer with visual inspection methods: a summary of completed and on-going studies in India. Salud Publica Mex 2003;45(suppl 3):S399-S407.
17. Howe HL: Repeat mammography among women over 50 years of age. Am J Prev Med 1992;8:182-185.
18. Bjurstam N, Bjorneld L, Warwick J, Sala E, Duffy SW, Nystrom L, Walker N, Cahlin E, Eriksson O, Hafstrom LO, Lingaas H, Mattsson J, Persson S, Rudenstam CM, Salander H, Save-Soderbergh J, Wahlin T: The Gothenburg Breast Screening Trial. Cancer 2003;97:2387-2396.
19. Miller AB, Baines CJ, To T, Wall C: Canadian National Breast Screening Study. 1. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 40 to 49 years. CMAJ 1992;147:1459-1476.
20. Thomas DB, Gao DL, Self SG, Allison CJ, Tao Y, Mahloch J, Ray R, Qin Q, Presley R, Porter P: Randomized trial of breast self-examination in Shanghai: methodology and preliminary results. J Natl Cancer Inst 1997;89:355-365.
21. Roberts MM, Alexander FE, Anderson TJ, Chetty U, Donnan PT, Forrest P, Hepburn W, Huggins A, Kirkpatrick AE, Lamb J, Muir BB, Prescott RJ: Edinburgh trial of screening for breast cancer: mortality at seven years. Lancet 1990;335:241-246.
22. Philip J, Harris WG, Flaherty C, Joslin CAF, Rustage JH, Wijesinghe DP: Breast self-examination: clinical results from a population-based prospective study. Br J Cancer 1984;50:7-12.
23. Matson S, Andersson I, Berglund G, Janzon L, Manjer J: Non-attendance in mammographic screening: a study of intra-urban differences from the city of Malmö in Sweden 1990-1994. Cancer Detect Prev 2001;25:132-137.
24. Leyden WA, Manos MM, Geiger AM, Weinmann S, Mouchawar J, Bischoff K, Yood MU, Gilbert J, Taplin SH: Cervical cancer in women with comprehensive health care access: attributable factors in the screening process. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005;97:675-683.
25. Zackrisson S, Andersson I, Manjer J, Janzon L: Non-attendance in breast cancer screening is associated with unfavourable socioeconomic circumstances and advanced carcinoma. Int J Cancer 2004; 108: 754-760.
26. Baines CJ, To T, Wall C: Women's attitudes to screening after participation in the national breast screening study. Cancer 1990; 65: 1663-1669.
27. Lagerlund M, Hedin A, Sparén P, Thurfjell E, Lambe M: Attitudes, beliefs, and knowledge as predictors of nonattendance in a Swedish population-based mammography screening program. Prev Med 2000; 31: 417-428.
28. Sankaranarayanan R, Budukh A, Rajkumar R: Effective screening programmes for cervical cancer in low- and middle-income developing countries. Bull World Health Organ 2001; 79: 954-962.
29. Sankaranarayanan R, Ramadas K, Thomas G, Muwonge R, Thara S, Mathew B, Rajan B: Effect of screening on oral cancer mortality in Kerala, India: a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005; 365: 1927-1933.
30. Sankaranarayanan R, Rajkumar R, Theresa R, Esmy PO, Mahe C, Bagyalakshmi KR, Thara S, Frappart L, Lucas E, Muwonge R, Shanthakumari S, Jeevan D, Subbarao TM, Parkin DM, Cherian J: Initial results from a randomized trial of cervical visual screening in rural South India. Int J Cancer 2004; 109: 461-467.
31. Yeole BB, Jussawalla DJ, Sabnis SD, Sunny L: Survival from breast and cervical cancers in Mumbai (Bombay), India; in Sankarnarayanan et al. (ed): Cancer Survival in Developing Countries. IARC Scientific Publication No. 145. Lyon, IARC, 1998, pp 79-90.