Roe deer Capreolus capreolus home-range sizes estimated from VHF and GPS data

Wildlife Biology

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 101-110

  Pellerin, Maryline ^a   Said, Sonia ^b   Gaillard, Jean Michel ^c  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b OFFICE NATIONAL DE LA CHASSE ET DE LA FAUNE SAUVAGE   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

Author keywords

Capreolus capreolus; Global Positioning System; Home range; Kernel estimator; Radio tracking; Roe deer; Sample size

Indexed keywords

CAPREOLUS; CAPREOLUS CAPREOLUS; CERVIDAE;

EID: 43049141143     PISSN: 09096396     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2981/0909-6396(2008)14[101:RDCCHS]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Adrados, C., Verheyden-Tixier, H., Cargnelutti, B., Pépin, D. & Janeau, G. 2003: GPS approach to study fine-scale site use by wild red deer during active and inactive behaviors. - Wildlife Society Bulletin 31: 544-552.
2. Arthur, S.M. & Schwartz, C.C. 1999: Effects of sample size on accuracy and precision of brown bear home range models. - Ursus 11: 139-148.
3. Becker, R.A., Wilks, A.R., Brownrigg, R. & Minka, T.P. 2007: Original S code by Richard R. Becker & Allan R. Wilks. R version by Ray Brownrigg. Enhancements by Thomas P. Minka 2007. Draw Geographical Maps. R package version 2.0 - 39.
4. Belant, J.L. & Follmann, E.H. 2002: Sampling considerations for American black and brown bear home range and habitat use. - Ursus 13: 299-315.
5. Biggs, J.R., Bennett, K.D. & Fresquez, P.R. 2001: Relationship between home range characteristics and the probability of obtaining successful global positioning system (GPS) collar positions for elk in New Mexico. - Western North American Naturalist 61: 213-222.
6. Börger, L., Franconi, N., De Michele, G., Gantz, A., Meschi, F., Manica, A., Lovari, S. & Coulson, T. 2006: Effects of sampling regime on the mean and variance of the home range size estimates. - Journal of Animal Ecology 75: 1393-1405.
7. Bowman, J.L., Kochanny, C.O., Demarais, S. & Leopold, B.D. 2000: Evaluation of a GPS collar for white-tailed deer. - Wildlife Society Bulletin 28: 141-145.
8. Calenge, C. 2006: The package adehabitat for the R software: A tool for the analysis of space and habitat use by animals. - Ecological Modelling 197: 516-519.
9. Chessel, D., Dufour, A-B. & Thioulouse, J. 2004: The ade4 package-I-one-table methods. - R news 4: 5-10.
10. D'Eon, R.G., Serrouya, R., Smith, G. & Kochanny, C.O. 2002: GPS radiotelemetry error and bias in mountainous terrain. - Wildlife Society Bulletin 30: 430-439.
11. Di Orio, A.P., Callas, R. & Schaefer, R.J. 2003: Performance of two GPS telemetry collars under different habitat conditions. - Wildlife Society Bulletin 31: 372-379.
12. Dussault, C., Courtois, R., Ouellet, J.P. & Huot, J. 1999: Evaluation of GPS telemetry collar performance for habitat studies in the boreal forest. - Wildlife Society Bulletin 27: 965-972.
13. Dussault, C., Courtois, R., Ouellet, J.P. & Huot, J. 2001: Influence of satellite geometry and differential correction on GPS location accuracy. - Wildlife Society Bulletin 29: 171-179.
14. Gaillard, J-M., Duncan, P., Delorme, D., Van Laere, G., Pettorelli, N. & Maillard, D. 2003: Effects of hurricane Lothar on the population dynamics of European roe deer. - Journal of Wildlife Management 67: 767-773.
15. Girard, I., Ouellet, J.P., Courtois, R., Dussault, C. & Breton, L. 2002: Effects of sampling effort based on GPS telemetry on home-range size estimations. - Journal of Wildlife Management 66: 1290-1300.
16. Hansteen, T.L., Andreassen, H.P. & Ims, R.A. 1997: Effects of spatiotemporal scale on autocorrelation and home range estimators. - Journal of Wildlife Management 61: 280-290.
17. Hemson, G., Johnson, P., South, A., Kenward, R., Ripley, R. & Macdonald, D. 2005: Are kernels the mustard? Data from global positioning system (GPS) collars suggests problems for kernel home-range analyses with least-squares cross-validation. - Journal of Animal Ecology 74: 455-463.
18. Linnell, J.D.C. 1994: Reproductive tactics and parental care in Norwegian roe deer. - PhD thesis, National University of Ireland, Cork, Ireland, pp. 234.
19. McNay, J., Morgan, A. & Bunnell, F.L. 1994: Characterizing independence of observations in the movement of Colombian black-tailed deer. - Journal of Wildlife Management 58: 422-429.
20. Moen, R., Pastor, J. & Cohen, Y. 1997: Accuracy of GPS telemetry collar locations with differential correction. - Journal of Wildlife Management 61: 530-539.
21. Moen, R., Pastor, J., Cohen, Y. & Schwartz, C.C. 1996: Effects of moose movement and habitat use on GPS collar performance. - Journal of Wildlife Management 60: 659-668.
22. Otis, D.L. & White, G.C. 1999: Autocorrelation of location estimates and the analysis of radiotracking data. - Journal of Wildlife Management 63: 1039-1044.
23. Pettorelli, N., Gaillard, J-M., Duncan, P., Maillard, D., Van Laere, G. & Delorme, D. 2003: Age and density modify the effects of habitat quality on survival and movements of roe deer. - Ecology 84: 3307-3316.
24. R Development Core Team 2004: R: A language and environment for statistical computing. - R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available at: http://www.R-project.org.
25. Rempel, R.S. & Rodgers, A.R. 1997: Effects of differential correction on accuracy of a GPS animal location system. - Journal of Wildlife Management 61: 525-530.
26. Rempel, R.S., Rodgers, A.R. & Abraham, K.F. 1995: Performance of a GPS animal location system under boreal forest canopy. - Journal of Wildlife Management 59: 543-551.
27. Reynolds, T.D. & Laundre, J.W. 1990: Time intervals for estimating pronghorn and coyote home ranges and daily movements. - Journal of Wildlife Management 54: 316-322.
28. Said, S., Gaillard, J-M., Duncan, P., Guillon, N., Guillon, N., Servanty, S., Pellerin, M., Lefeuvre, K., Martin, C. & Van Laere, G. 2005: Ecological correlates of home-range size in spring-summer for female roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in a deciduous woodland. - Journal of Zoology (London) 267: 301-308.
29. Seaman, D.E., Millspaugh, J.J., Kernohan, B.J., Brandige, G.C., Raedeke, K.J. & Gitzen, R.A. 1999: Effects of sample size on kernel home range estimates. - Journal of Wildlife Management 63: 739-747.
30. Seaman, D.E. & Powell, R.A. 1990: Identifying patterns and intensity of home range use. - International Conference on Bear Research and Management 8: 243-249.
31. Seaman, D.E. & Powell, R.A. 1996: An evaluation of the accuracy of kernel density estimators for home range analysis. - Ecology 77: 2075-2085.
32. Silverman, B.W. 1986: Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. - Chapman & Hall (Ed.), London, United Kingdom, pp. 176.
33. Stickel, L.F. 1954: A comparison of certain methods of measuring ranges of small mammals. - Journal of Mammalogy 35: 1-15.
34. Strandgaard, H. 1972: The roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) population at Kale and the factors regulating its size. - Danish Review of Game Biology 7: 1-205.
35. Swihart, R.K. & Slade, N.A. 1985a: Influence of sampling interval on estimates of home range size. - Journal of Wildlife Management 49: 1019-1025.
36. Swihart, R.K. & Slade, N.A. 1985b: Testing for independence of observations in animal movements. - Ecology 66: 1176-1184.
37. Swihart, R.K. & Slade, N.A. 1986: The importance of statistical power when testing for independence in animal movements. - Ecology 67: 255-258.
38. Swihart, R.K. & Slade, N.A. 1997: On testing for independence of animals movements. - Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics 2: 1-16.
39. White, G.C. & Garrott, R.A. 1990: Analysis of wildlife radio tracking data. - Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA, pp. 383.
40. Worton, B.J. 1989: Kernel methods for etimating the utilization distribution in home-range studies. - Ecology 70: 164-168.