Experience with 969 Minimal Access Colectomies: The Role of Hand-Assisted Laparoscopy in Expanding Minimally Invasive Surgery for Complex Colectomies

Journal of the American College of Surgeons

Volumn 206, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 946-950

  Cima, Robert R ^a   Pattana arun, Jirawat ^a   Larson, David W ^a   Dozois, Eric J ^a   Wolff, Bruce G ^a   Pemberton, John H ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COLON RESECTION; COLORECTAL SURGERY; DATA BASE; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HAND SURGERY; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; OPERATION DURATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COLECTOMY; COLONIC DISEASES; FEMALE; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RECTAL DISEASES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE;

EID: 43049120969     PISSN: 10727515     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.12.021     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Jacobs M., Veredeja J.C., and Goldstein H.S. Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc 1 (1991) 144-150
2. Fowler D.C., and White S.A. Brief clinical report: Laparoscopic-assisted sigmoid resection. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1 (1991) 183
3. COLOR (Colon Cancer Open or Laparoscopic Resection) Study. Janson M., Bjorholt I., Carlsson P., et al. Randomized clinical trial of the costs of open and laparoscopic surgery for colonic cancer. Br J Surg 91 (2004) 409-417
4. COST (Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group). A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350 (2004) 2050-2059
5. Noel J.K., Fahrbach K., Estok R., et al. Minimally invasive colorectal resection outcomes: short-term comparison with open procedures. J Am Coll Surg 204 (2007) 291-307
6. Steele S.R., Brown T.A., Rush R.M., and Martin M.J. Laparoscopic vs open colectomy for colon cancer: results from a large nationwide population-based analysis. J Gastrointest Surg (2007) Sep 7; [Epub ahead of print]
7. Guller U., Jain N., Hervey S., et al. Laparoscopic vs open colectomy: outcomes comparison based on large nationwide databases. Arch Surg 138 (2003) 1179-1186
8. Nakajima K., Lee S.W., Cocilovo C., et al. Laparoscopic total colectomy: hand-assisted vs standard technique. Surg Endosc 18 (2004) 582-586
9. Targarona E.M., Gracia E., Garriga J., et al. Prospective randomized trial comparing conventional laparoscopic colectomy with hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy: applicability, immediate clinical outcome, inflammatory response, and cost. Surg Endosc 16 (2002) 234-239
10. Rivadeneira D.E., Marcello P.W., Roberts P.L., et al. Benefits of hand-assisted laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy: a comparative study. Dis Colon Rectum 47 (2004) 1371-1376
11. HALS Study Group. Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery vs standard laparoscopic surgery for colorectal disease: a prospective randomized trial. Surg Endosc 14 (2000) 896-901
12. Maartense S., Bemelman W.A., van der Hoop A.G., et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS): a report of 150 procedures. Surg Endosc 18 (2004) 397-401
13. Larson D.W., Cima R.R., Dozois E.J., et al. Safety, feasibility, and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic ileal-pouch-anal anastomosis: a single institutional case-matched experience. Ann Surg 243 (2006) 667-670 discussion 670-672
14. Larson D.W., Dozois E.J., Piotrowicz K., et al. Laparoscopic-assisted vs. open ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: functional outcome in a case-matched series. Dis Colon Rectum 48 (2005) 1845-1850
15. Meijer D., Bannenberg J., and Jakimowicz J. Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery: An overview. Surg Endosc 14 (2000) 891-895