Laboratory performance comparison of the elastomer-modified asphalt mixtures

Building and Environment

Volumn 43, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 1270-1277

  Özen, Halit ^a   Aksoy, Atakan ^b   Tayfur, Süreyya ^c   Çelik, Fazil ^b  

^a YILDIZ TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b KARADENIZ TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^c ISFALT Asphalt Company   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Asphalt mixture; Elastomer; LCPC wheel tracking test; Polymer; Repeated creep

Indexed keywords

CREEP; CREEP TESTING; DEFORMATION; ELASTOMERS;

ASPHALT MIXTURES; DYNAMIC CREEP TEST; REPEATED CREEP; WHEEL-TRACKING TESTS;

ASPHALT;

ASPHALT; CREEP; CREEP TESTING; DEFORMATION; ELASTOMERS;

ASPHALT; CREEP; DEFORMATION MECHANISM; EFFICIENCY MEASUREMENT; ELASTICITY; LABORATORY METHOD; LOADING TEST; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; POLYMER;

EID: 43049115329     PISSN: 03601323     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2007.03.010     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Robertus C, Mulder EA, Koole RC. SBS modified bitumen for heavy duty asphalt pavements. Second international conference on roads and airfield pavement technology. Singapore; September 1995.
2. Bonemazzi F, Braga V, Corrieri R, Giavarini C, Sartori F. Characteristics of polymers and polymer-modified binders. Transportation Research Record 1535. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board; 1996. p. 36-47.
3. Mostafa A.E., Gerardo W.F., and Imad L.A. Quantitative effect of elastomeric modification on binder performance at intermediate and high temperatures. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering 15 1 (2003) 32-40
4. Visser AT, Long F, Verhaeghe A, Taute A. Provisional validation of the new South African hot-mix asphalt design method (mix design-1:7-6). Ninth international conference on asphalt pavements. Copenhagen, Denmark; August 2002, p. 36-47.
5. Tayfur S., Ozen H., and Aksoy A. Investigation of rutting performance of asphalt mixtures containing polymer modifiers, Construction and Building Materials 21 (2006) 328-337
6. Aschenbrener T. Comparison of results obtained from the French rutting tester with pavements of known field performance. Colorado Department of Transportation, Report no: CDOT-DTD-R-92-11; October 1992.
7. Corte JF, Brosscaud Y, Simonceli JP, Caroff G. Investigation of rutting of asphalt surface layers: influence of binder and axle load configurations,.Transportation Research Board, 1436; 1994.
8. Brown S.F. Practical test procedures for mechanical properties of bituminous materials. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Transport 111 (1995) 289-297
9. Jansen Venneboer J, Van der Heide JPJ, Molenaar AAA. Asphalt constructions for heavy duty pavements and road widenings in the Netherlands, Eurasphalt & Eurobitume Congress; 1996.
10. Ulmgren N. Functional testing of asphalt mixes for permanent deformation by dynamic creep test modification of method and Round Robin Test, Eurasphalt & Eurobitume Congress; 1996.
11. Valkering CP, Lancon DJL, Hilster ED, Stoker DA. Rutting resistance of asphalt mixes containing non-conventional and polymer-modifed binders. AAPT Conference. Albuquerque, USA; 19/21 February 1990.
12. Chen J.-S., and Liao M.-C. Evaluation of internal resistance in hot mix asphalt concrete. Construction and Building Materials 16 (2002) 313-319
13. Conuegra A. A comparative evaluation of laboratory compaction devices based on their ability to produce mixtures with engineering properties similar to those produced in the field. 68th TRB-meeting. Washington DC; January 1989.
14. Caltabiano MA, Waters TJ. The effect of sample compaction on the mix characteristics. 8th AAPA international asphalt conference. Sydney, Australia; 1991.