Qualitative research techniques

Clinical Research Methods for Surgeons

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 297-310

  Berry, Donna L ^a,b   Maliski, Sally L ^c   Ellis, William J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 43049104269     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-59745-230-4_17     Document Type: Chapter

References (43)

1. Heidegger M. Being and time. New York: Harper & Row, 1962.
2. Merleau-Ponty M. What is phenomenology? Cross Currents 1956;6:59-70.
3. Glaser B, Strauss A. The discovery of grounded theory. New York: Aldine Publishing, 1967.
4. Denzin NK, Lincoln, Y. Strategies of qualitative inquiry. In: Denzin YL, ed. The handbook of 1ualitative research. Vol. 2. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc, 2000; 346.
5. Burns N, Grove S. The practice of nursing research: conduct, critique, & utilization. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company, 2001; 840.
6. Miller WL, Crabtree BF. Clinical research. In: Denzin YL, ed. The handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc, 2000; 607-631.
7. Risjord MW, Dunbar SB, Moloney MF. A new foundation for methodological triangulation. J Nurs Scholarsh 2002;34:269-275.
8. Benoliel J. Advancing nursing science: qualitative approaches. West J Nurs Res 1984;7:1-8.
9. Strang P. Qualitative research methods in palliative medicine and palliative oncology. Acta Oncot 2000;39:911-917.
10. Berry DL. Return-to-work experiences of people with cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum 1993;20:905-911.
11. Berry DL. Detection and diagnosis experiences of employed persons with urologic cancer. Urol Nurs 1994;14:52-56.
12. Maliski SL, Heilemann MV, McCorkle R. Mastery of postprostatectomy incontinence and impotence: his work, her work, our work. Oncol Nurs Forum 2001;28:985-992.
13. Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993; 85:365-376.
14. Litwin MS, Hays RD, Fink A, et al. Quality-of-life outcomes in men treated for localized prostate cancer. JAMA 1995;273:129-135.
15. McCorkle R. The measurement of symptom distress. Semin Oncol Nurs 1987;3:248-256.
16. Holley SK. Evaluating patient distress from cancer-related fatigue: an instrument development study. Oncol Nurs Forum 2000;27:1425-1431.
17. Sofaer S. Qualitative research methods. Int J Qual Health Care 2002;14:329-336.
18. Brown JB, Sangster LM, Ostbye T, et al. Walk-in clinics: patient expectations and family physician availability. Fam Pract 2002;19:202-206.
19. Silverman D. Analyzing talk and text. In: Denzin YL, ed. The handbook of 1ualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc, 2000; 821-834.
20. Allen DG, Hardin PK. Discourse analysis and the epidemiology of meaning. Nurs Philosophy 2001;2:163-176.
21. Tedlock B. Ethnography and ethnographic representation. In: Lincoln NDY, ed. Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2000;455-486.
22. Spradley J. The ethnographic interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1979.
23. Spradley J. Participant observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1980.
24. Glaser B. Theoretical sensitivity: advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press, 1978.
25. Strauss A. Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
26. Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1998.
27. Creswell JW. Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1998.
28. van Mannen M. Researching the lived experience. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1990.
29. Benner P. Interpretive phenomenology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1994.
30. Sandelowski M. Telling stories: narrative approaches in qualitative research. Image J Nurs Sch 1991;23:161-166.
31. Riessman C. Narrative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1993.
32. Berry DL, Ellis WJ, Schwien CC, Woods NF. Treatment decision making by men with localized prostate cancer: the influence of personal factors. Urol Oncol 2003;21:93-100.
33. Feldman-Stewart D, Brundage MD, Nickel JC, MacKillop WJ. The information required by patients with early-stage prostate cancer in choosing their treatment. BJU Int 2001;87:218-223.
34. Feldman-Stewart D, Brundage MD, Van Manen L. A decision aid for men with early stage prostate cancer: theoretical basis and a test by surrogate patients. Health Expect 2001;4:221-234.
35. Davison BJ, Gleave ME, Goldenberg SL, et al. Assessing information and decision preferences of men with prostate cancer and their partners. Cancer Nurs 2002;25:42-49.
36. Patel HR, Mirsadraee S, Emberton M. The patient's dilemma: prostate cancer treatment choices. J Urol 2003;169:828-833.
37. Steginga SK, Gardiner RA, Yaxley J, Heathcote P. Making decisions about treatment for localized prostate cancer. BJU Int 2002;89:255-260.
38. Diefenbach MA, Dorsey J, Uzzo RG, et al. Decision-making strategies for patients with localized prostate cancer. Semin Urol Onco1 2002;20:55-62.
39. Dawson NA, Fourcade RO, Newling D. The management of localized prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2002;5(Suppl. 2):S3-S7.
40. Yan Y, Carvalhal GF, Catalona WJ, Young JD. Primary treatment choices for men with clinically localized prostate carcinoma detected by screening. Cancer 2000;88:1122-1130.
41. Holmboe ES, Concato J. Treatment decisions for localized prostate cancer: asking men what's important. J Gen Intern Med 2000;15:694-701.
42. Bourdon S. The integration of 1ualitative data analysis software in research strategies: resistances and possibilities. Vol. 2003: Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 2002.
43. Barry C. Choosing qualitative data analysis software: Atlas/ti and NUD*IST compared. Sociol Res Online [Online serial] 1998;3.