Fusion rates after thoracoscopic release and bone graft substitutes in idiopathic scoliosis

Spine

Volumn 33, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 1079-1083

  Weinzapfel, Brett ^a   Son Hing, Jochen P ^b   Armstrong, Douglas G ^b   Blakemore, Laurel C ^c   Poe Kochert, Connie ^b   Thompson, George H ^b  

^a University Hospitals Case Medical Center   (United States)

^b CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c CHILDREN'S NATIONAL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Allograft bone matrix; Anterior thoracic discectomies; Demineralized bone matrix; Fusion rates; Idiopathic scoliosis; Thoracoscopy; Video assisted thoracoscopy surgery

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANTERIOR SPINE FUSION; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; BONE ALLOGRAFT; BONE DEMINERALIZATION; BONE MATRIX; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISKECTOMY; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPINE FUSION; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; THORACOSCOPY; WOUND INFECTION;

ADOLESCENT; BONE SUBSTITUTES; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; CHILD; DISKECTOMY; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GLYCEROL; HUMANS; OSSEOINTEGRATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SCOLIOSIS; SPINAL FUSION; THORACIC SURGERY, VIDEO-ASSISTED; THORACIC VERTEBRAE; TIME FACTORS; TRANSPLANTATION, HOMOLOGOUS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 43049099351     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816f69b3     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Bridwell KH. Normalization of the coronal and sagittal profile in idiopathic scoliosis: options of treatment. Spine 1999;24:225-39.
2. Berven SH, Deviren V, Smith JA, et al. Management of fixed sagittal plane deformity: outcome of combined anterior and posterior surgery. Spine 2003;28:1710-15.
3. Roberto RF, Lonstein JE, Winter RB, et al. Curve progression in Risser stage 0 or 1 patients after posterior spinal fusion for idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 1997;17:718-25.
4. Lapinsky AS, Richards BS. Preventing the crankshaft phenomenon by combining anterior fusion with posterior instrumentation. Does it work? Spine 1995;20:1392-8.
5. Newton PO. The use of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Instr Course Lect 2005;54:551-8.
6. Son-Hing JP, Blakemore LC, Poe-Kochert C, et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in idiopathic scoliosis: evaluation of the learning curve. Spine 15;32:703-7.
7. Newton PO, Parent S, Marks M, et al. Prospective evaluation of 50 consecutive scoliosis patients surgically treated with thoracoscopic anterior instrumentation. Spine 2005;1:30:S100-109.
8. Newton PO, Cardelia JM, Farnsworth CL, et al. A biomechanical comparison of open and thoracoscopic anterior spinal release in a goat model. Spine 1998;23:530-5.
9. Crawford AH. Anterior surgery in the thoracic and lumbar spine: endoscopic techniques in children. Instr Course Lect 2005;54:567-76.
10. Faro FD, Marks MC, Newton PO, et al. Perioperative changes in pulmonary function after anterior scoliosis instrumentation: thoracoscopic versus open approaches. Spine 2005;30:1058-63.
11. Newton PO, Marks M, Faro F, et al. Use of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery to reduce perioperative morbidity in scoliosis surgery. Spine 2003;28:S249-254.
12. Sasso RC, LeHuec JC, Shaffrey C; Spine Interbody Research Group. Iliac crest bone graft donor site pain after anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a prospective patient satisfaction outcome assessment. J Spinal Disord Tech 2005;18:S77-S81.
13. Ahlmann E, Patzakis M, Roidis N, et al. Comparison of anterior and posterior iliac crest bone grafts in terms of harvest-site morbidity and functional outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002;84-A:716-20.
14. Ebraheim NA, Elgafy H, Xu R. Bone-graft harvesting from iliac and fibular donor sites: techniques and complications. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2001;9:210-18.
15. Skaggs DL, Samuelson MA, Hale JM, et al. Complications of posterior iliac crest bone grafting in spine surgery in children. Spine 2000;25:2400-2.
16. Banwart JC, Asher MA, Hassanein RS. Iliac crest bone graft harvest donor site morbidity. A statistical evaluation. Spine 1995;20:1055-60.
17. Al-Sayyad MJ, Crawford AH, and Wolf RK. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: the Cincinnati experience. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005;434:61-70.
18. Kurz LT, Garfin SR, Booth RE Jr. Harvesting autogenous iliac bone grafts. A review of complications and techniques. Spine 1989;14:1324-31.
19. Sandhu HS, Grewal HS, Parvataneni H. Bone grafting for spinal fusion. Orthop Clin North Am 1999;30:685-98.
20. Sassard WR, Eidman DK, Gray PM, et al. Augmenting local bone with Grafton demineralized bone matrix for posterolateral lumbar spine fusion: avoiding second site autologous bone harvest. Orthopedics 2000;23:1059-64.
21. Peterson B, Whang PG, Iglesias R, et al. Osteoinductivity of commercially available demineralized bone matrix. Preparations in a spine fusion model. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004;86:2243-50.
22. Newton PO, White KK, Faro F, et al. The success of thoracoscopic anterior fusion in a consecutive series of 112 pediatric spinal deformity cases. Spine 2005;30:392-8.
23. Sanders JO, Evert M, Stanley EA, et al. Mechanisms of curve progression following sublaminar (Luque) spinal instrumentation. Spine 1992;17:781-9.
24. Briem D, Windolf J, Lehmann W, et al. [Bone grafts endoscopically applied to the spine Ergebnisse der anterioren Fusion und therapeutische Konsequenzen]. Unfallchirurg 2004;107:1152-61.
25. Sucato DJ, Hedequist D, Zhang H, et al. Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 enhances anterior spinal fusion in a thoracoscopically instrumented animal model. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004;86:752-62.
26. Polly DW, Cunningham BW, Kuklo TR, et al. Anterior thoracic scoliosis constructs: effect of rod diameter and intervertebral cages on multisegmental construct stability. Spine 2003;3:213-19.
27. DeOrio JK, Farber DC. Morbidity associated with anterior iliac crest bone grafting in foot and ankle surgery. Foot Ankle Int 2005;26:147-51.
28. Cheng I, Oshtory R, Wildstein MS. The role of osteobiologics in spinal deformity. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2007;18:393-401.
29. Khan SN, Fraser JF, Sandhu HS, et al. Use of osteopromotive growth factors, demineralized bone matrix, and ceramics to enhance spinal fusion. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2005;13:129-37.
30. Whang PG, Wang JC. Bone graft substitutes for spinal fusion. Spine 2003;3:155-65.
31. Berven S, Tay BK, Kleinstueck FS, et al. Clinical applications of bone graft substitutes in spine surgery: consideration of mineralized and demineralized preparations and growth factor supplementation. Eur Spine J 2001;10:S169-S177.
32. Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, McEnery KW, et al. Anterior fresh frozen structural allografts in the thoracic and lumbar spine. Do they work if combined with posterior fusion and instrumentation in adult patients with kyphosis or anterior column defects? Spine 1995;20:1410-18.
33. Dobbs MB, Lenke LG, Kim YJ, et al. Anterior/posterior spinal instrumentation versus posterior instrumentation alone for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliotic curves more than 90 degrees. Spine 2006;31:2386-91.
34. Luhmann SJ, Lenke LG, Kim YJ, et al. Thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis curves between 70 degrees and 100 degrees: is anterior release necessary? Spine 2005;30:2061-67.
35. Suk SI, Chung ER, Kim JH, et al. Posterior vertebral column resection for severe rigid scoliosis. Spine 2005;30:1682-87.
36. Ahn UM, Ahn NU, Buchowski JM, et al. Functional outcome and radiographic correction after spinal osteotomy. Spine 2002;27:1303-11.
37. Kishan S, Bastrom T, Betz RR, et al. Thoracoscopic scoliosis surgery affects pulmonary function less than thoracotomy at 2 years postsurgery. Spine 2007;32:453-8.