Vascular and biliary variants in the liver: Implications for liver surgery

Radiographics

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 359-378

  Catalano, Onofrio A ^a   Singh, Anandkumar H ^a   Uppot, Raul N ^a   Hahn, Peter F ^a   Ferrone, Cristina R ^b   Sahani, Dushyant V ^a  

^a Department of Radiology

^b Department of Surgery ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ANGIOGRAPHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; HEPATOBILIARY SYSTEM; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; INFUSION PUMP; INTRAARTERIAL DRUG ADMINISTRATION; LIVER; LIVER DISEASE; LIVER RESECTION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; PATHOLOGY; PREOPERATIVE CARE; REVIEW; VASCULARIZATION;

ANGIOGRAPHY; BILIARY TRACT; CONTRAST MEDIA; HEPATECTOMY; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; INFUSION PUMPS, IMPLANTABLE; INFUSIONS, INTRA-ARTERIAL; LIVER; LIVER DISEASES; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; PREOPERATIVE CARE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 42949177600     PISSN: 02715333     EISSN: 15271323     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/rg.282075099     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Sahani D, Mehta A, Blake M, Prasad S, Harris G, Saini S. Preoperative hepatic vascular evaluation with CT and MR angiography: implications for surgery. RadioGraphics 2004;24(5):1367-1380.
2. Sahani D, D'souza R, Kadavigere R, et al. Evaluation of living liver transplant donors: method for precise anatomic definition by using a dedicated contrast-enhanced MR imaging protocol. Radio-Graphics 2004;24(4):957-967.
3. Limanond P, Raman SS, Ghobrial RM, Busuttil RW, Lu DS. Preoperative imaging in adult-to-adult living related liver transplant donors: what surgeons want to know. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2004;28(2):149-157.
4. Taguchi K, Anno H. High temporal resolution for multislice helical computed tomography. Med Phys 2000;27(5):861-872.
5. Chan JK, Tso WK, Lo CM, et al. Preoperative evaluation of potential living donors for liver transplantation: the role of helical computed tomography-angiography. Transplant Proc 1998;30(7):3197-3198.
6. Pannu HK, Maley WR, Fishman EK. Liver transplantation: preoperative CT evaluation. Radio-Graphics 2001;21(spec issue):S133-S146.
7. Sahani D, Saini S, Nichols S, et al. Using multide-tector CT for preoperative vascular evaluation of liver neoplasms: technique and results. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;179(l):53-59.
8. Yeh BM, Breiman RS, Taouli B, Qayyum A, Roberts JP, Coakley FV. Biliary tract depiction in living potential liver donors: comparison of conventional MR, mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced excretory MR, and multi-detector row CT cholangiography - initial experience. Radiology 2004;230(3):645-651.
9. Lim JS, Kim MJ, Kim JH, et al. Preoperative MRI of potential living-donor-related liver transplantation using a single dose of gadobenate dimeglumine. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005; 185(2) :424-431.
10. Soyer P, Heath D, Bluemke DA, et al. Three-dimensional helical CT of intrahepatic venous structures: comparison of three rendering techniques. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1996;20(1):122-127.
11. Lerut JP, Mazza D, van Leeuw V, et al. Adult liver transplantation and abnormalities of splanchnic veins: experience in 53 patients. Transpl Int 1997;10(2):125-132.
12. Sugarbaker PH, Nelson RC, Murray DR, Chez-mar JL, Bernardino ME. A segmental approach to computerized tomographic portography for hepatic resection. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1990;171(3):189-195.
13. Cheng YF, Huang TL, Lee TY, Chen TY, Chen CL. Variation of the intrahepatic portal vein: angiographic demonstration and application in living-related hepatic transplantation. Transplant Proc 1996;28(3):1667-1668.
14. Mortele KJ, Ros PR. Anatomic variants of the biliary tree: MR cholangiographic findings and clinical applications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;177(2):389-394.
15. Guiney MJ, Kruskal JB, Sosna J, Hanto DW, Goldberg SN, Raptopoulos V. Multi-detector row CT of relevant vascular anatomy of the surgical plane in split-liver transplantation. Radiology 2003;229(2):401-407.
16. Adams RB, Haller DG, Roh MS. Improving re-sectability of hepatic colorectal metastases: expert consensus statement by Abdalla et al. Ann Surg Oncol 2006;13(10):1281-1283.
17. Chapman WC, Hoff PM, Strasberg SM. Selection of patients for resection of hepatic colorectal metastases: expert consensus statement by Charnsan-gavej et al. Ann Surg Oncol 2006; 13(10): 1269-1270.
18. Bipat S, van Leeuwen MS, Comans EF, et al. Colorectal liver metastases: CT, MR imaging, and PET for diagnosis - meta-analysis. Radiology 2005;237(1):123-131.
19. Charnsangavej C, Clary B, Fong Y, Grothey A, Pawlik TM, Choti MA. Selection of patients for resection of hepatic colorectal metastases: expert consensus statement. Ann Surg Oncol 2006;13(10):1261-1268.
20. Lang H, Radtke A, Hindennach M, et al. Impact of virtual tumor resection and computer-assisted risk analysis on operation planning and intraoperative strategy in major hepatic resection. Arch Surg 2005;140(7):629-638; discussion 638.
21. Kemeny N, Huang Y, Cohen AM, et al. Hepatic arterial infusion of chemotherapy after resection of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 1999;341(27):2039-2048.
22. Allen PJ, Stojadinovic A, Ben-Porat L, et al. The management of variant arterial anatomy during hepatic arterial infusion pump placement. Ann Surg Oncol 2002;9(9):875-880.
23. Allen PJ, Nissan A, Picon AI, et al. Technical complications and durability of hepatic artery infusion pumps for unresectable colorectal liver metastases: an institutional experience of 544 consecutive cases. J Am Coll Surg 2005;201(1):57-65.
24. Coskun M, Kayahan EM, Ozbek O, Cakir B, Dal-gic A, Haberal M. Imaging of hepatic arterial anatomy for depicting vascular variations in living related liver transplant donor candidates with multi-detector computed tomography: comparison with conventional angiography. Transplant Proc 2005;37(2):1070-1073.
25. Erbay N, Raptopoulos V, Pomfret EA, Kamel IR, Kruskal JB. Living donor liver transplantation in adults: vascular variants important in surgical planning for donors and recipients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;181 (1):109-114.
26. Kamel IR, Lawler LP, Fishman EK. Variations in anatomy of the middle hepatic vein and their impact on formal right hepatectomy. Abdom Imaging 2003;28(5):668-674.
27. Atri M, Bret PM, Fraser-Hill MA. Intrahepatic portal venous variations: prevalence with US. Radiology 1992;184(1):157-158.
28. Itamoto T, Emoto K, Mitsuta H, et al. Safety of donor right hepatectomy for adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation. Transpl Int 2006;19(3):177-183.
29. Goldman J, Florman S, Varotti G, et al. Non-invasive preoperative evaluation of biliary anatomy in right-lobe living donors with mangafodipir triso-dium-enhanced MR cholangiography. Transplant Proc 2003;35(4):1421-1422.
30. Bassignani MJ, Fulcher AS, Szucs RA, Chong WK, Prasad UR, Marcos A. Use of imaging for living donor liver transplantation. RadioGraphics 2001;21(l):39-52.
31. Kapoor V, Peterson MS, Baron RL, Patel S, Eghtesad B, Fung JJ. Intrahepatic biliary anatomy of living adult liver donors: correlation of mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced MR cholangiography and intraoperative cholangiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 179(5): 1281-1286.
32. Lo CM, Fan ST, Liu CL, Lai EC, Wong J. Biliary complications after hepatic resection: risk factors, management, and outcome. Arch Surg 1998;133(2):156-161.
33. Capussotti L, Ferrero A, Vigano L, Sgotto E, Mu-ratore A, Polastri R. Bile leakage and liver resection: where is the risk? Arch Surg 2006;141 (7):690-694; discussion 695.
34. Perini RF, Uflacker R, Cunningham JT, Selby JB, Adams D. Isolated right segmental hepatic duct injury following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2005;28(2):185-195.
35. Christensen RA, vanSonnenberg E, Nemcek AA Jr, D'Agostino HB. Inadvertent ligation of the aberrant right hepatic duct at cholecystectomy: radiologic diagnosis and therapy. Radiology 1992;183(2):549-553.
36. Turner MA, Fulcher AS. The cystic duct: normal anatomy and disease processes. RadioGraphics 2001;21(l):3-22.
37. Hirao K, Miyazaki A, Fujimoto T, Isomoto I, Hayashi K. Evaluation of aberrant bile ducts before laparoscopic cholecystectomy: helical CT cholangiography versus MR cholangiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 175(3):713-720.