Multidetector CT angiography of infrainguinal arterial bypass

Radiographics

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 529-548

  Lopera, Jorge E ^a,b   Trimmer, Clayton K ^a   Josephs, Shellie G ^a   Anderson, Matthew E ^a   Schuber, Scott ^a   Li, Ruizong ^a   Dolmatch, Bart ^a   Toursarkissian, Boulos ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ANGIOGRAPHY; BLOOD VESSEL TRANSPLANTATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMORAL ARTERY; HUMAN; LEG; LIMB SALVAGE; METHODOLOGY; PERIPHERAL OCCLUSIVE ARTERY DISEASE; PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE; POPLITEAL ARTERY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; RADIOGRAPHY; REVIEW; SAPHENOUS VEIN; TRANSPLANTATION; VASCULARIZATION;

ANGIOGRAPHY; ARTERIAL OCCLUSIVE DISEASES; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMORAL ARTERY; HUMANS; LEG; LIMB SALVAGE; PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASES; POPLITEAL ARTERY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; SAPHENOUS VEIN; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 42949150977     PISSN: 02715333     EISSN: 15271323     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/rg.282075032     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. BeidleTR, Brom-Ferral R, Letourneau JG. Surveillance of infrainguinal vein grafts with duplex sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994;162(2):443-48.
2. Rose SC. Noninvasive vascular laboratory for evaluation of peripheral arterial occlusive disease. II. Clinical applications: chronic, usually atherosclerotic, lower extremity ischemia. J Vase Interv Radiol 2000;11(10):1257-1275.
3. Willmann JK, Mayer D, Banyai M, et al. Evaluation of peripheral arterial bypass grafts with multidetector row CT angiography: comparison with duplex US and digital subtraction angiography. Radiology 2003;229(2):465-474.
4. Meissner OA,Verrel F,Tat6 F, et al. Magnetic resonance angiography in the follow-up of distal lower-extremity bypass surgery: comparison with duplex ultrasound and digital subtraction angiography. J Vase Interv Radiol 2004; 15(11): 1269-1277.
5. Veith F, PanettaTF,Wengerter KR, et al. Femoral- popliteal-tibial occlusive disease. In: Veith FJ, et al, eds. Vascular surgery: principles and practice. 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1994; 421-446.
6. Mannick JA, Jackson BT, Coffman JD, Hume DM. Success of bypass vein grafts in patients with isolated popliteal artery segments. Surgery 1967;61(1): 17-25.
7. Ascer E, Veith FJ, Gupta SK. Bypasses to plantar arteries and other tibial branches: an extended approach to limb salvage. J Vase Surg 1988;8(4): 434-41.
8. Whittemore AD, Belkin M. Infrainguinal bypass. In: Rutherford RB, ed. Vascular surgery. 5th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Saunders, 2000; 998-1018.
9. Leather RP, Shah DM. In situ saphenous vein arterial bypass. In: Veith FJ, et al, eds. Vascular surgery: principles and practice. 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1994; 447-58.
10. Leather RP, Shan DM, Karmody AM. Infrapo-pliteal arterial bypass for limb salvage: increased patency and utilization of the saphenous vein used "in situ. " Surgery 1981;90(6):1000-1008.
11. Towne JB.The autogenous vein. In: Rutherford RB, ed. Vascular surgery. 5th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Saunders, 2000; 539-549.
12. Miller A, Stonebridge PA,Tsoukas Al, et al. Angio-scopically directed valvulotomy: a new valvulotome and technique. JVasc Surg 1991;13(6):813-820.
13. Brewster DC, LaSalle AJ, Robison JG, Strayhorn EC, Darling RC. Femoropopliteal graft failures: clinical consequences and success of secondary reconstructions. Arch Surg 1983;118(9):1043-1047.
14. Johnson WC, Lee KK. A comparative evaluation of polytetrafluoroethylene, umbilical vein, and saphenous vein bypass grafts for femoral-popliteal above-knee revascularization: a prospective randomized Department of Veterans Affairs cooperative study. J Vase Surg 2000;32(2):268-277.
15. Brewster DC. Prosthetic grafts. In: Veith FJ, et al, eds. Vascular surgery: principles and practice. 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1994; 559-583.
16. Abbott WM, Green RM, MatsumotoT, et al. Prosthetic above-knee femoropopliteal bypass grafting: results of a multicenter randomized prospective trial. Above-Knee Femoropopliteal Study Group. J Vase Surg 1997;25(l):19-28.
17. Devine C, Hons B, McCollum C. Heparin-bonded Dacron or polytetrafluoroethylene for femoropopliteal bypass grafting: a multicenter trial. J Vase Surg 2001;33(3):533-539.
18. Veith FJ, Gupta SK, Ascer E, et al. Six-year prospective multicenter randomized comparison of autologous saphenous vein and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene grafts in infrainguinal arterial reconstructions. J Vase Surg 1986;3(1):104-114.
19. Sala F, Hassen-Khodja R, Lecis A, Bouillanne PJ, Declemy S, Batt M. Long-term outcome of femoral above-knee popliteal artery bypass using autologous saphenous vein versus expanded polytetrafluoroethylene grafts. Ann Vase Surg 2003; 17(4):401-07.
20. Tyrrell MR, Chester JF,Vipond MN, Clarke GH, Taylor RS, Wolfe JH. Experimental evidence to support the use of interposition vein collars/ patches in distal PTFE anastomoses. Eur J Vase Surg 1990;4(1):95-101.
21. Taylor RS, Loh A, McFarland RJ, Cox M, Chester JF. Improved technique for polytetrafluoroethylene bypass grafting: long-term results using anastomotic vein patches. Br J Surg 1992;79(4):348-354.
22. Dardik H, Silvestri F, Alasio T, et al. Improved method to create the common ostium variant of the distal arteriovenous fistula for enhancing crural prosthetic graft patency. J Vase Surg 1996; 24(2):240-248.
23. Kreienberg PB, Darling RC, Chang BB, Paty PS, Lloyd WE, Shah DM. Adjunctive techniques to improve patency of distal prosthetic bypass grafts: polytetrafluoroethylene with remote arteriovenous fistulae versus vein cuffs. J Vase Surg 2000; 31(4):696-701.
24. Flinn WR, Rohrer MJ,Yao JS, McCarthy WJ, Fa-hey VA, Bergan JJ. Improved long-term patency of infragenicular polytetrafluoroethylene grafts. J Vase Surg 1988;7(5):685-690.
25. McCarthy WJ, Pearce WH, Flinn WR, McGee GS, Wang R,Yao JS. Long-term evaluation of composite sequential bypass for limb-threatening ischemia. JVasc Surg 1992;15(5):761-769.
26. Verta MJ Jr. Composite sequential bypasses to the ankle and beyond for limb salvage. J Vase Surg 1984; l(2):381-386.
27. Bastounis E, Georgopoulos S, Maltezos C, Alexiou D, Chiotopoulos D, Bramis J. PTFE-vein composite grafts for critical limb ischaemia: a valuable alternative to all-autogenous infrageniculate reconstructions. Eur JVasc Endovasc Surg 1999;18(2):127-132.
28. Taylor LM, Edwards JM, Porter JM. Present status of reversed vein bypass grafting: 5-year results of a modern series. JVasc Surg 1990;11 (2):193-205.
29. Bergamini TM, Towne JB, Bandyk DF, Seabrook GR, Schmitt DD. Experience with in situ saphenous vein bypasses during 1981 to 1989: determinant factors of long-term patency. JVasc Surg 1991; 13(1):137-147.
30. Shah DM, Darling RC, Chang BB, Fitzgerald KM, Paty PS, Leather RP. Long-term results of in situ saphenous vein bypass: analysis of 2058 cases. Ann Surg 1995;222(4):438-446.
31. Belkin M, Donaldson MC, Whittemore AD, et al. Observations on the use of thrombolytic agents for thrombotic occlusion of infrainguinal vein grafts. J Vase Surg 1990;11 (2):289-294.
32. Sun Z. Diagnostic accuracy of multislice CT angiography in peripheral arterial disease. JVasc Interv Radiol 2006;17(12):1915-1921.
33. Kock MC, Adriaensen ME, Pattynama PM, et al. DSA versus multi-detector row CT angiography in peripheral arterial disease: randomized controlled trial. Radiology 2005;237(2):727-737.
34. Willmann JK, Baumert B, SchertlerT, et al. Aor-toiliac and lower extremity arteries assessed with 16-detector row CT angiography: prospective comparison with digital subtraction angiography.Radiology 2005;236(3):1083-1093.
35. Ouwendijk R, Kock MC, van Dijk LC, van Sam-beek MR, StijnenT, Hunink MG. Vessel wall calcifications at multi-detector row CT angiography in patients with peripheral arterial disease: effect on clinical utility and clinical predictors. Radiology 2006;241(2):603-608.
36. Donaldson MC, Mannick JA, Whittemore AD. Causes of primary graft failure after in situ saphenous vein bypass grafting. JVasc Surg 1992; 15(1):113-118.
37. Pereira CE, Albers M, Romiti M, Brochado-Neto FC, Pereira CA. Meta-analysis of femoropopliteal bypass grafts for lower extremity arterial insufficiency. JVasc Surg 2006;44(3):510-517.
38. Bandyk DF. Infection in prosthetic vascular grafts. In: Rutherford RB, ed. Vascular surgery. 5th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Saunders, 2000; 733-751.
39. Mertens RA, O'Hara PJ, Hertzer NR, Krajewski LP, Beven EG. Surgical management of infrainguinal arterial prosthetic graft infections: review of a thirty-five-year experience. JVasc Surg 1995; 21(5):782-790.
40. Perera GB, Fujitani RM, Kubaska SM. Aortic graft infection: update on management and treatment options. Vase Endovascular Surg 2006;40(1):1-10.
41. Wilson SE. New alternatives in management of the infected vascular prosthesis. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2001;2(2):171-175; discussion 175-177.
42. Orton DF, LeVeen RF, Saigh JA, et al. Aortic prosthetic graft infections: radiologic manifestations and implications for management. RadioGraphics 2000; 20(4):977-993.