Effects of Computer-Based Cognitive Mapping on Reading Comprehension for Students with Emotional Behavior Disorders

Journal of Special Education Technology

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 15-23

  Blankenship, Tracy L ^a   Ayres, Kevin M ^a   Langone, John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 42949142916     PISSN: 01626434     EISSN: 23813121     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/016264340502000202     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Ausubel D., (1963). The Psychology of Meaningful Verbal Learning. New York: Grune & Straton.
2. Bakken J. K., Mastropieri M. A., Scruggs T. E., (1997). Reading comprehension of expository science material and students with learning disabilities: A comparison of strategies. The Journal of Special Education, 31, 300–324.
3. Barenholtz H., Pinchas T., (1992). A comprehensive use of concept mapping in design instruction and assessment. Research in Science & Technological Education, 10, 37–51.
4. Boyle J. R., (1996). The effects of a cognitive mapping strategy on the literal and inferential comprehension of students with mild disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 19, 86–98.
5. Boyle J. R., Weishaar M., (1997). The effects of expert-generated versus student-generated cognitive organizers on the reading comprehension of students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 12, 228–235.
6. Cooper J. O., Heron T. E., Heward W. L., (1987). Applied Behavior Analysis. Columbus, OH: Merrill Publishing.
7. Cunningham A. E., Stanovich K. E., (1998). What reading does for the mind. American Educator, 22(1&2), 8–15.
8. Higgins K., Boone R., (1990). Hypertext computer study guides and the social studies achievement of students with learning disabilities, remedial students, and regular education students. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 9, 529–540.
9. Higgins K., Boone R., Lovitt T., (1996). Hypertext support for remedial students and students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 402–412.
10. Hirsch E. D., (1987). Cultural literacy: What every American needs to know. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
11. Inspiration [Computer software]. (2000). Portland, OR: Inspiration Software, Inc.
12. Kirsch I. S., Jungeblut A., Jenkins L., Kolstad A., (1993, September). Adult literacy in America: A first look at the results of the national adult literacy survey (Vol. 17). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
13. Lin A., Podell D. M., Tournaki-Rein N., (1994). CAI and the development of automaticity in mathematics skills in students with and without mild mental handicaps. Computers in Schools, 11, 43–58.
14. Malone L. D., Mastropieri M. A., (1992). Reading comprehension instruction: Summarization and self-monitoring training for students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 59, 270–278.
15. Scanlon D. J., Duran G. Z., Reyes E. I., Gallego M. A., (1992). Interactive semantic mapping: An interactive approach to enhancing LD students' content area comprehension. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 7, 142–146.
16. Strum J. M., Rankin-Erickson J. L., (2002). Effects of hand-drawn and computer-generated concept mapping on the expository writing of middle school students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 17, 124–139.
17. Tawney J. W., Gast D. L., (1984). Single Subject Research In Special Education. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill Publishing.
18. Vallecorsa A. L., deBettencourt L. U., (1997). Using mapping procedure to teach reading and writing skills to middle grade students with leaning disabilities. Education and Treatment of Children, 20, 173–188.
19. Williams P. L., Reese C. M., Campbell J.R., Mazzeo J., Phillips G.W., (1995). NAEP 1994 reading: A first look. (rev. ed. Vol. 1995 O-402-235). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.