Peer review and the Journal of Sexual Medicine: Management and collaborative effort

Journal of Sexual Medicine

Volumn 5, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 1029-1032

  Roberts, Jason ^a   Schena, Donna ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDITORIAL; HUMAN; MEDICAL LITERATURE; PEER REVIEW; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; QUALITY CONTROL; SEXUALITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 42949124084     PISSN: 17436095     EISSN: 17436109     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.00828.x     Document Type: Editorial

References (11)

1. I. Hames Peer review and manuscript management in scientific journals 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Oxford 1 3
2. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: Writing and editing for biomedical publication. Updated 2007. http://www.icmje.org (accessed February 2, 2008).
3. E. Wager F. Godlee T. Jefferson How to survive peer review 2002 BMJ Books London 3
4. D. Rennie Peer review in Prague JAMA 280 1998 214 215
5. Publishing Research Consortium. Peer review in scholarly journals: Perspective of the scholarly community—An international study. 2008. Available at: http://www.publishingresearch.net (accessed February 2, 2008).
6. I. Goldstein The Journal of Sexual Medicine through ritual and spontaneity J Sex Med 4 2007 1523 1525
7. I. Goldstein The inaugural issue of the Journal of Sexual Medicine (JSM) J Sex Med 1 2004 1 2
8. I. Goldstein The silver lining of a crisis: The Journal of Sexual Medicine establishes the ethics committee J Sex Med 2 2005 161 162
9. C. Graf E. Wager A. Bowman S. Fiack D. Scott-Lichter A. Robinson Best practice guidelines on publication ethics: a publisher's perspective Int J Clin Pract 61 2007 1 26
10. S. Lock A difficult balance. Editorial peer review in medicine 1985 ISI Press Philadelphia
11. R. Dalton Misconduct: The stars who fell to earth Nature 420 2002 728 729