Assessing economic effects: Co-existence of genetically modified maize in agriculture in France and Germany

Science and Public Policy

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 107-119

  Menrad, Klaus ^a   Reitmeier, Daniela ^b  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b German Biogas Association   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL POLICY; CROP PRODUCTION; EUROPEAN UNION; GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISM; MAIZE; POLICY IMPLEMENTATION;

CENTRAL EUROPE; EURASIA; EUROPE; FRANCE; GERMANY; WESTERN EUROPE;

ZEA MAYS;

EID: 42949120223     PISSN: 03023427     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3152/030234208X285391     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Alcock, K T 2005. Co-existence: an Australian perspective. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on the Co-existence between GM and non-GM based Agricultural Supply Chains (GMCC 05) held 14-15 November 2005 at Montpellier, France. A Messéan ed. pp. 45-50.
2. Angevin, F, E K Klein, C Choimet, J M Meynard, A de Rouw and Y Sohbi 2001. Modélisation des effets des systèmes de culture et du climat sur les pollinisations croisées chez le maïs, In Pertinence économique et faisabilité d'une filière sans utilisation d'OGM. Eds. FNSEA-INRA, pp. 21-36. Paris: INRA.
3. Bénétrix, F 2005. Managing the co-existence of conventional and genetically modified maize from field to silo - a French initiative. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on the Co-existence between GM and non-GM based Agricultural Supply Chains (GMCC 05) held 14-15 November 2005 at Montpellier, France. A Messéan ed., pp. 161-163.
4. Bock, A-K, K Lheureux, M Libeau-Dulos, H Nilsagard and E Rodriguez-Cerezo. 2002. Scenarios for co-existence of genetically modified, conventional and organic crops in European agriculture. Report EUR 20394EN, Seville.
5. Brookes, G 2006. The co-existence of GM and non-GM arable crops in the EU: Economic and market considerations. In: International Trade and Policies for Genetically Modified Products,. R E Evanson and V Santaniello eds., pp. 64-78. Wallingford, UK and Cambridge, MA: CABI Publishing.
6. Brookes, G and P Barfoot 2003. Co-existence of GM and non-GM crops: case study of maize grown in Spain. In: Proceedings of the First European Conference on the Co-existence of Genetically Modified Crops with Conventional and Organic Crops (GMCC 03) held 13-14 November 2003 at Slagelse, Denmark. B Boelt ed., pp. 143-144.
7. Clive, J 2006. Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops in 2006. ISAAA Briefs 35. Ithaca, NY: ISAAA.
8. Commission of the European Communities 2003. Commission Recommendation of 23 July 2003 on guidelines for the development of national strategies and best practices to ensure the co-existence of genetically modified crops with conventional and organic farming. Official Journal of the European Union. K (2003), p. 2624.
9. Dalla Costa, A J, N M Paula and R M R Santos 2005. Co-existence of GM and conventional soybean productive chain: experiences of cooperatives and processing firms. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on the Co-existence between GM and non-GM based Agricultural Supply Chains (GMCC 05) held 14-15 November 2005 at Montpellier, France. A Messéan ed., pp. 51-56.
10. Degenhardt, H, F Horstmann and N Mülleder 2003. Bt-Mais in Deutschland - Erfahrungen mit dem Praxisanbau von 1998 bis 2002. Mais 31 (2), 75-77.
11. Directorate-General for Agriculture, European Commission 2002. Economic impacts of genetically modified crops on the agrifood sector - A synthesis. Available at , last accessed 25 May 2006.
12. European Parliament and the Council of the European Union 2003a. Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003. Official Journal of the European Union.
13. European Parliament and the Council of the European Union 2003b. Regulation (EC) No 1830/2003. Official Journal of the European Union.
14. Fagan, J 2004. Without a trace? New GMO labelling rules. The European Food & Drink Review, Special Feature. Available at , last accessed 27 May 2006.
15. Frank, R 2004. European Consumer Study 2004. In: Themenbereich: Emährung und Gesundheit. Nümberg: Gesellschaft für Konsum-, Markt- und Absatzforschung e.V.
16. Gaskell, G, A Allansdottir, N Allum, C Corchero et al. 2006. Eurobarometer 64.3 - Europeans and biotechnology in 2005: Patterns and trends. Report to Directorate-General for Research, European Commission, Brussels.
17. GMO Compass 2007. GM maize growing in five EU member states. Available at , last accessed 21 December 2007.
18. GNIS (Groupement National Interprofessionnel des Semences), 2003. Règlements techniques de la production, du contrôle et de la certification des semences. Tome 1: Semences de grandes cultures certifiées, commerciales, mélanges, pp. 83-104. Paris: GNIS.
19. Hugger, H 2004. Personal communication on economics of maize seed production in South West Germany. Regional Commission/Council of Fribourg, August 2004.
20. Jany K-D and S Schuh 2005. Die neuen EU-Verordnungen Nr. 1829/2003 und Nr. 1830/2003 zu genetisch veränderten Lebens- und Futtermitteln: die Kennzeichnung. Journal für Emährungsmedizin (2), 6-12.
21. Kalaitzandonakes, N 2005. Technical and economic issues related to co-existence supply chains. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on the Co-existence between GM and non-GM Based Agricultural Supply Chains (GMCC 05) held 14-15 November 2005, Montpellier, France. A Messéan ed., pp. 29-30.
22. Le Bail, M and J M Meynard 2001. Isolement des collectes et maitrise des dissémination au champ. Rapport du groupe 3 du programme de recherche 'Pertinence économique et faisabilité d'une filière sans utilisation d'OGM'. Paris: FNSEA-INRA
23. Lheureux,K, M Libeau-Dulos, E Rodriguez Cerezo, K Menrad, M Menrad and D Vorgrimler 2003. Review of GMOs under research and development and in the pipeline in Europe. European Commission, Brussels.
24. Menrad K 2003. Strategies and economic assessments. In: Proceedings of the First European Conference on the Coexistence of Genetically Modified Crops with Conventional and Organic Crops (GMCC 03) held 13-14 November 2003, Slagelse, Denmark. B Boelt B ed., pp. 137-139.
25. Menrad K and D Reitmeier 2006. New case studies on the coexistence of GM and non-GM crops in European agriculture. Economic assessment of co-existence schemes and measures. Final report to IPTS, Seville, Science Centre Straubing, Available at , last accessed 1 December 2006.
26. Messéan A, F Angevin, M Gomez-Barbero, K Menrad and E Rodriguez-Cerezo 2006. New case studies on the co-existence of GM and non-GM crops in European agriculture. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, EUR 22102 EN.
27. Reitmeier, D and K Menrad 2006. Co-existence costs under German regulation - Case Study of Bt maize. Paper presented at the 10th Conference on Agricultural Biotechnology: Facts, Analysis and Policies (ICABR) held 29 June -2 July 2006 at Ravello, Italy.
28. Sanvido, O, F Widmer, M Winzeler, B Streit, E Szerencsits and F Bigler 2005. Konzept für die Koexistenz verschiedener landwittschaftlicher Anbausysteme mit und ohne Gentechnik in der Schweiz. Schriftenreihe der FAL No. 55, FAL Agroscope, Reckenholz.
29. Soregaroli C and J Wesseler 2005. Minimum distance requirements and liability: implications for co-existence. In: Environmental Costs and Benefits of Transgenic Crops. J Wesseler ed., pp. 165-182. Dordrecht: Springer.
30. Teyssier, D 2004. Index des prix et des normes agricoles 2004-2005, 20th edition, Paris: Lavoisier.
31. Tolstrup, K, S B Andersen, B Boelt, M Buus et al. 2003. Report from the Danish working group on the co-existence of genetically modified crops with conventional and organic crops. report Plant production report no. 94. Tjele, Denmark: DIAS.
32. Van Acker R C 2005. Co-existence of GM and non-GM crops in Canada: current status and future direction. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on the Co-existence between GM and non-GM based Agricultural Supply Chains (GMCC 05) held 14-15 November 2005 at Montpellier, France. A Messéan ad., pp. 39-44.
33. Weber, W E, T Bringezu, I Broer, F Holz and J Eder. 2005a. Koexistenz von gentechnisch verändertem und konventionellem Mais - Ergebnisse des Erprobungsanbaus zu Silomais 2004. Mais 32(1), 1-5.
34. Weber, W E, T Bringezu, I Broer, F Holz and J Eder 2005b. Koexistenz von gentechnisch verändertem und konventionellem Mais - Ergebnisse des Erprobungsanbaus Kömermais 2004. Mais 32(2), 1-3.