Nash equilibria in bandwidth allocation for non-cooperative peer-to-peer networks

Journal of Systems Architecture

Volumn 54, Issue 1-2, 2008, Pages 81-96

  Lója, Krisztina ^a   Giaccone, Paolo ^b  

^a BUDAPEST UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS   (Hungary)

^b POLITECNICO DI TORINO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Bandwidth allocation; Game theory; Nash equilibrium; Peer to peer networks

Indexed keywords

FILE ORGANIZATION; FREQUENCY ALLOCATION; GAME THEORY; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

NASH EQUILIBRIUM; PEER-TO-PEER NETWORKS;

DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER SYSTEMS;

EID: 42949116834     PISSN: 13837621     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.sysarc.2007.04.001     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. D. Manini, R. Gaeta, M. Sereno, Performance modeling of P2P file sharing applications, in: IEEE Workshop on Techniques, Methodologies and Tools for Performance Evaluation of Complex Systems, Torino, September 2005.
2. Adar E., and Huberman B. Free riding on Gnutella. First Monday 5 10 (2000)
3. M. Feldman, K. Lai, J. Chuang, I. Stoica, Quantifying disincentives in peer-to-peer networks, in: 1st Workshop on Economics of Peer-to-Peer Systems, June 2003.
4. eMule, Help on connection settings, , December 2006.
5. P. Marbach, Priority Service and Max-Min Fairness, in: IEEE INFOCOM'02, June 2002.
6. Feldman M., Papadimitriou C., Chuang J., and Stoica I. Free-riding and whitewashing in peer-to-peer systems. IEEE JSAC 24 5 (2006) 1010-1019
7. Courcoubetis C., and Weber R. Incentives for large peer-to-peer systems. IEEE JSAC 24 5 (2006) 1034-1050
8. C. Buragohain, D. Agrawal, S. Suri, A game theoretic framework for incentives in P2P systems, in: Peer-to-Peer Computing 2003, September 2003, pp. 48-56.
9. M. Feldman, K. Lai, I. Stoica, J. Chuang, Robust incentive techniques for peer-to-peer networks, in: ACM E-Commerce Conference (EC'04), May, 2004.
10. K. Ranganathan, M. Ripeanu, A. Sarin, I. Foster, To share or not to share: an analysis of incentives to contribute in collaborative file sharing environments, in: Workshop on Economics of Peer-to-Peer Systems, June 2003.
11. M. Meo, F. Milan, A rational model for service rate allocation in peer-to-peer networks, in: Global Internet Symposium (GI2005), Miami, FL, March 2005.
12. R.T.B. Ma, S.C.M. Lee, J.C.S. Lui, D.K.Y. Yau, A game theoretic approach to provide incentive and service differentiation in P2P networks, in: ACM SIGMETRICS'04, New York, June 2004.
13. Felegyhazi M., Hubaux J.-P., and Buttyan L. Nash equilibria of packet forwarding strategies in wireless ad hoc networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing 5 5 (2006) 463-476
14. Yaiche H., Mazumdar R.R., and Rosenberg C. A game theoretic framework for bandwidth allocation and pricing in broadband networks. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 8 5 (2000) 667-678
15. Y. Jin, G. Kesidis, Nash equilibria of a generic networking game with applications to circuit-switched networks, in: IEEE INFOCOM 2003, 2 April 2003, pp. 1242-1249.
16. B. Cohen, Incentives Build Robustness in BitTorrent, in: Workshop on Economics of Peer-to-Peer Systems, 2003.
17. Rasmusen E. Games and Information (2001), Blackwell Publishers
18. Nash J. Equilibrium Points in N-Person Games. National Academy of Sciences 36 (1950) 48-49
19. Nash J. Non-cooperative games. Annals of Mathematics 54 (1951) 286-295
20. van Lint J.H., and Wilson R.M. A Course in Combinatorics (1992), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
21. Schelling T. The Strategy of Conflict (1960), Harvard University Press
22. Speed Guide, , January 2007.