Spatial variation of d-density-wave order in the presence of impurities

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 69, Issue 22, 2004, Pages

  Ghosal, Amit ^a   Kee, Hae Young ^b  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONDUCTANCE; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL PARAMETERS; MODEL; SUPERCONDUCTOR; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 42749108533     PISSN: 01631829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.69.224513     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. S. Chakravarty, R. B. Laughlin, D. K. Morr, and C. Nayak, Phys. Rev. B 63, 094503 (2001).
2. B. I. Halperin and T. M. Rice, in Solid State Physics, edited by F. Seitz, D. Turnbull, and H. Ehrenreich (Academic Press, New York, 1968), Vol. 21, p. 115.
3. I. Affleck and J. B. Marston, Phys. Rev. B 37, 3774 (1988); J. B. Marston and I. Affleck, ibid. 39, 11538 (1989).
4. I. Affleck and J. B. Marston, Phys. Rev. B 37, 3774 (1988); J. B. Marston and I. Affleck, ibid. 39, 11538 (1989).
5. T. C. Hsu, J. B. Marston, and I. Affleck, Phys. Rev. B 43, 2866 (1991).
6. S. Chakravarty, H.-Y. Kee, and C. Nayak, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 15, 2901 (2001).
7. H. A. Mook et al., Phys. Rev. B 64, 012502 (2001); 66, 144513 (2002).
8. H. A. Mook et al., Phys. Rev. B 64, 012502 (2001); 66, 144513 (2002).
9. Y. Sidis et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4100 (2001).
10. C. Stock et al., Phys. Rev. B 66, 024505 (2002).
11. For a review on SCTMA results see K. Maki in "Lectures on the Physics of Highly Correlated Electron System", edited by F. Mancini, AIP Conf. Proc. No. 438 (AIP, New York, 1998), and references therein.
12. B. Dora, A. Virosztek, and K. Maki, Phys. Rev. B 66, 115112 (2002); cond-mat/0302362.
13. A. Ghosal, M. Randeria, and N. Trivedi, Phys. Rev. B 63, 20505R (2000).
14. c cuprates. However, we checked that our main conclusion-see the conclusion section: the DDW order responds to the density fluctuations due to impurities so that it allows us to understand the effect of impurities based on the phase diagram of the pure system-also applies to the attractive potential. Based on the phase diagram of the pure system, the DDW order is more sensitive to the attractive potential than that of DSC order.
15. int could produce both the DSC or the DDW orders. However, we keep both terms for stabilizing DDW phase [see J.-X. Zhu, W. Kim, C. S. Ting, and J. P. Carbotte, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 197001 (2001); C. Wu and W. V. Liu, Phys. Rev. B 66, 020511(R) (2002)] and also to be able to tune both the orders independently.
16. int could produce both the DSC or the DDW orders. However, we keep both terms for stabilizing DDW phase [see J.-X. Zhu, W. Kim, C. S. Ting, and J. P. Carbotte, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 197001 (2001); C. Wu and W. V. Liu, Phys. Rev. B 66, 020511(R) (2002)] and also to be able to tune both the orders independently.
17. P. G. de Gennes, Superconductivity in Metals and Alloys (Benjamin, New York, 1966).
18. A. Ghosal, M. Randeria, and N. Trivedi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3940 (1998); ibid. 65, 014501 (2001).
19. A. Ghosal, M. Randeria, and N. Trivedi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3940 (1998); ibid. 65, 014501 (2001).
20. In order to achieve accelerated convergence on multivariable space we use the Broyden method [see, e.g., W. E. Pickett, Comput. Phys. Rep. 9, 115 (1989)]. We have checked that the same self-consistent solution is obtained for different initial guesses.
21. J.-X. Zhu, W. Kim, C. S. Ting, and J. P. Carbotte, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 197001 (2001); C. Wu and W. V. Liu, Phys. Rev. B 66, 020511(R) (2002).
22. J.-X. Zhu, W. Kim, C. S. Ting, and J. P. Carbotte, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 197001 (2001); C. Wu and W. V. Liu, Phys. Rev. B 66, 020511(R) (2002).
23. We found that the quantities presented in the Figs. 1 and 3 are reasonably self-averaging, so that averaging over 10-12 realizations is sufficient. Similar number of configurations were considered in the A. Ghosal, M. Randeria, and N. Trivedi, Phys. Rev. B 63, 20505R (2000); Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3940 (1998); Phys. Rev. B 65, 014501 (2001).
24. We found that the quantities presented in the Figs. 1 and 3 are reasonably self-averaging, so that averaging over 10-12 realizations is sufficient. Similar number of configurations were considered in the A. Ghosal, M. Randeria, and N. Trivedi, Phys. Rev. B 63, 20505R (2000); Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3940 (1998); Phys. Rev. B 65, 014501 (2001).
25. We found that the quantities presented in the Figs. 1 and 3 are reasonably self-averaging, so that averaging over 10-12 realizations is sufficient. Similar number of configurations were considered in the A. Ghosal, M. Randeria, and N. Trivedi, Phys. Rev. B 63, 20505R (2000); Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3940 (1998); Phys. Rev. B 65, 014501 (2001).
26. A. Ghosal, C. Kallin, and A. J. Berlinsky, Phys. Rev. B 66, 214502 (2002).
27. D. K. Morr, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 106401 (2002).
28. W. A. Atkinson, P. J. Hirschfeld, and A. H. MacDonald, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3922 (2000).
29. W. Kim, J.-X. Zhu, J. P. Carbotte, and C. S. Ting, Phys. Rev. B 65, 064502 (2002).