Anomalous dynamics of forced translocation

Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics

Volumn 69, Issue 2 1, 2004, Pages

  Kantor, Yacov ^a   Kardar, Mehran ^b  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BACTERIA; CHEMICAL BONDS; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DNA; ELECTROPHORESIS; GELS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MONOMERS; POLYMERIC MEMBRANES; PROTEINS; REACTION KINETICS; STATISTICAL METHODS;

BROWNIAN TRANSLOCATION; GEL ELECTROPHORESIS; POLYMERIC CONSTRAINTS; TRANSLOCATION;

POLYMERS;

EID: 42749107580     PISSN: 1063651X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.69.021806     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. B. Alberts, Molecular Biology of the Cell (Garland, New York, 1994).
2. B. Hanss, E. Leal-Pinto, L.A. Bruggeman, T.D. Copland, and P.E. Klotman, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95, 1921 (1998).
3. J. Han and S.W. Turner, and H.G. Craighead, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1688 (1999).
4. S.E. Henrickson, M. Misakian, B. Robertson, and J. Kasianowicz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3057 (2000).
5. A. Meller, L. Nivon, and D. Branton, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3435 (2001).
6. J. Kasianowicz, E. Brandin, D. Branton, and D. Deamer, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93, 13770 (1996); M. Akeson, D. Branton, J. Kasianowicz, E. Brandin, and D. Deamer, Biophys. J. 77, 3227 (1999); A. Meller, L. Nivon, E. Brandin, J. Golovchenko, and D. Branton, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97, 1079 (2000).
7. J. Kasianowicz, E. Brandin, D. Branton, and D. Deamer, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93, 13770 (1996); M. Akeson, D. Branton, J. Kasianowicz, E. Brandin, and D. Deamer, Biophys. J. 77, 3227 (1999); A. Meller, L. Nivon, E. Brandin, J. Golovchenko, and D. Branton, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97, 1079 (2000).
8. J. Kasianowicz, E. Brandin, D. Branton, and D. Deamer, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93, 13770 (1996); M. Akeson, D. Branton, J. Kasianowicz, E. Brandin, and D. Deamer, Biophys. J. 77, 3227 (1999); A. Meller, L. Nivon, E. Brandin, J. Golovchenko, and D. Branton, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97, 1079 (2000).
9. A. Baumgärtner and M. Muthukumar, J. Chem. Phys. 87, 3082 (1987).
10. M. Muthukumar and A. Baumgärtner, Macromolecules 22, 1937 (1989); 22, 1941 (1989).
11. M. Muthukumar and A. Baumgärtner, Macromolecules 22, 1937 (1989); 22, 1941 (1989).
12. G.W. Slater and S.Y. Wu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 164 (1995).
13. E. Arvanitidou and D. Hoagland, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 1464 (1991); D.A. Hoagland and M. Muthukumar, Macromolecules 25, 6696 (1992); P. Mayer, G.W. Slater, and G. Drouin, Appl. Theor Electrophor 3, 147 (1993); N.A. Rotstein and T.P. Lodge, Macromolecules 25, 1316 (1992); I. Szabo, G. Bathori, F. Tombola, M. Brini, A. Coppola, and M. Zoratti, J. Biol. Chem. 272, 25275 (1997).
14. E. Arvanitidou and D. Hoagland, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 1464 (1991); D.A. Hoagland and M. Muthukumar, Macromolecules 25, 6696 (1992); P. Mayer, G.W. Slater, and G. Drouin, Appl. Theor Electrophor 3, 147 (1993); N.A. Rotstein and T.P. Lodge, Macromolecules 25, 1316 (1992); I. Szabo, G. Bathori, F. Tombola, M. Brini, A. Coppola, and M. Zoratti, J. Biol. Chem. 272, 25275 (1997).
15. E. Arvanitidou and D. Hoagland, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 1464 (1991); D.A. Hoagland and M. Muthukumar, Macromolecules 25, 6696 (1992); P. Mayer, G.W. Slater, and G. Drouin, Appl. Theor Electrophor 3, 147 (1993); N.A. Rotstein and T.P. Lodge, Macromolecules 25, 1316 (1992); I. Szabo, G. Bathori, F. Tombola, M. Brini, A. Coppola, and M. Zoratti, J. Biol. Chem. 272, 25275 (1997).
16. E. Arvanitidou and D. Hoagland, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 1464 (1991); D.A. Hoagland and M. Muthukumar, Macromolecules 25, 6696 (1992); P. Mayer, G.W. Slater, and G. Drouin, Appl. Theor Electrophor 3, 147 (1993); N.A. Rotstein and T.P. Lodge, Macromolecules 25, 1316 (1992); I. Szabo, G. Bathori, F. Tombola, M. Brini, A. Coppola, and M. Zoratti, J. Biol. Chem. 272, 25275 (1997).
17. E. Arvanitidou and D. Hoagland, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 1464 (1991); D.A. Hoagland and M. Muthukumar, Macromolecules 25, 6696 (1992); P. Mayer, G.W. Slater, and G. Drouin, Appl. Theor Electrophor 3, 147 (1993); N.A. Rotstein and T.P. Lodge, Macromolecules 25, 1316 (1992); I. Szabo, G. Bathori, F. Tombola, M. Brini, A. Coppola, and M. Zoratti, J. Biol. Chem. 272, 25275 (1997).
18. P.-G. de Gennes, Scaling Concepts in Polymer Physics (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 1979).
19. M. Muthukumar, J. Chem. Phys. 111, 10 371 (1999).
20. M. Muthukumar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3188 (2001).
21. P.G. de Gennes, Physica A 274, 1 (1999).
22. D.K. Lubensky and D.R. Nelson, Biophys. J. 77, 1824 (1999).
23. A. Baumgärtner and J. Skolnick, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 2142 (1995).
24. R. Zandi, D. Reguera, J. Rudnick, and W.M. Gelbart, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 8649 (2003).
25. Y. Kafri, D.K. Lubensky, and D.R. Nelson, e-print cond-mat/0310455.
26. P.J. Park and W. Sung, J. Chem. Phys. 108, 3013 (1998).
27. E. Slonkina and A.B. Kolomeisky, J. Chem. Phys. 118, 7112 (2003).
28. H.C. Loebl, R. Randel, S.P. Goodwin, and C.C. Matthai, Phys. Rev. E 67, 041913 (2003).
29. C.Y. Kong and M. Muthukumar, Electrophoresis 23, 2697 (2002).
30. A. Meller, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 15, R581 (2003).
31. M. Doi and S.F. Edwards, The Theory of Polymer Dynamics (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1986).
32. K. Kremer and K. Binder, J. Chem. Phys. 81, 6381 (1984); G.S. Grest and K. Kremer, Phys. Rev. A 33, 3628 (1986).
33. K. Kremer and K. Binder, J. Chem. Phys. 81, 6381 (1984); G.S. Grest and K. Kremer, Phys. Rev. A 33, 3628 (1986).
34. I. Carmesin, K. Kremer, Macromolecules 21, 2819 (1988).
35. J. Chuang, Y. Kantor, and M. Kardar, Phys. Rev. E 65, 011802 (2001).
36. U. Gerland, R. Bundschuh, and T. Hwa, e-print cond-mat/0306126.
37. Z. Farkas, I. Derenyi, and T. Vicsek, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 15, S1767 (2003).
38. N. Madras and G. Slade, Self-Avoiding Walk (Birkhäuser, Boston, 1999).
39. S.-S. Chern, A.E. Cádenas, and R.D. Coalson, J. Chem. Phys. 115, 7772 (2001).
40. In nonequilibrium situations described in this work, the Monte Carlo procedure is used to emulate the Brownian dynamics rather than to sample the equilibrium states.
41. R. Metzler and J. Klafter, Phys. Rep. 339, 1 (2000), and references therein.