Spectrum and transition rates of the XX chain analyzed via Bethe ansatz

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 69, Issue 17, 2004, Pages

  Biegel, Daniel ^a   Karbach, Michael ^a,b   Müller, Gerhard ^b   Wiele, Klaus ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WUPPERTAL   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATOMIC PARTICLE; CALCULATION; DYNAMICS; ENERGY; FERMION; MAGNETIC FIELD; MAGNETISM; MAGNON; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MODEL; QUANTUM MECHANICS; QUASIPARTICLE; ROTATION; SPINON; VACUUM; VELOCITY;

EID: 42749107337     PISSN: 01631829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.69.174404     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. M. Takahashi, Thermodynamics of One-Dimensional Solvable Models (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1999).
2. V.E. Korepin, N.M. Bogoliubov, and A.G. Izergin, Quantum Inverse Scattering Method and Correlation Functions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993).
3. M. Karbach and G. Müller, Phys. Rev. B 62, 14 871 (2000).
4. M. Karbach, D. Biegel, and G. Müller, Phys. Rev. B 66, 054405 (2002).
5. Throughout this paper, the exchange constant is used as energy unit: J = 1.
6. V.E. Korepin, Commun. Math. Phys. 86, 391 (1982).
7. A.G. Izergin and V.E. Korepin, Commun. Math. Phys. 99, 271 (1985).
8. N. Kitanine, J.M. Maillet, and V. Terras, Nucl. Phys. B 554, 647 (1999).
9. D. Biegel, M. Karbach, and G. Müller, Europhys. Lett. 59, 882 (2002).
10. D. Biegel, M. Karbach, and G. Müller, J. Phys. A 36, 5361 (2003).
11. J. des Cloizeaux and M. Gaudin, J. Math. Phys. 7, 1384 (1966).
12. T. Deguchi, K. Fabricius, and B.M. McCoy, J. Stat. Phys. 102, 701 (2001).
13. K. Fabricius and B.M. McCoy, J. Stat. Phys. 103, 647 (2001).
14. K. Fabricius and B.M. McCoy, J. Stat. Phys. 104, 573 (2001).
15. i stay real. Using the latter significantly facilitates the tasks of solving the Bethe ansatz equations and calculating transition rates.
16. F.H.L. Essler, V.E. Korepin, and K. Schoutens, J. Phys. A 25, 4115 (1992).
17. M. Karbach, K. Hu, and G. Müller, Comput. Phys. 12, 565 (1998).
18. F. Woynarovich, J. Phys. C 15, 6397 (1982).
19. A.A. Vladimirov, Phys. Lett. 105A, 418 (1984).
20. K. Iseler and M. Paranjape, Phys. Lett. B 319, 209 (1993).
21. A. Ilakovac, M. Kolanovic, S. Pallua, and P. Prester, Phys. Rev. B 60, 7271 (1999).
22. F.D.M. Haldane, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 937 (1991).
23. E. Lieb, T. Schulz, and D. Mattis, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 16, 407 (1961).
24. A one-to-one mapping between individual states is not possible for degenerate levels because of the different natural eigenbases in the two representations.
25. L.D. Faddeev and L.A. Takhtajan, Phys. Lett. 85A, 375 (1981).
26. D. Biegel, Diplomarbeit, Bergische Universität Gesamthochchule Wuppertal, 2000.
27. Alternative sets of Bethe quantum numbers for the two states with k̄=4 in Table III are (3.5,0.5,0.5,-0.5) and (3.5,1.5,0.5, -1.5), respectively.
28. S. Katsura, T. Horiguchi, and M. Suzuki, Physica (Amsterdam) 46, 67 (1970).
29. M. Karbach, G. Müller, A.H. Bougourzi, A. Fledderjohann, and K.-H. Mütter, Phys. Rev. B 55, 12 510 (1997).
30. A.H. Bougourzi, M. Karbach, and G. Müller, Phys. Rev. B 57, 11 429 (1998).
31. A. Luther and I. Peschel, Phys. Rev. B 12, 3908 (1975).
32. G. Müller and R.E. Shrock, Phys. Rev. B 29, 288 (1984).
33. K. Fabricius and B.M. McCoy, J. Stat. Phys. 111, 323 (2003).
34. D. Biegel, M. Karbach, G. Müller, and K. Wiele (unpublished).