Molecular production in two component atomic fermi gases

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 93, Issue 26 I, 2004, Pages

  Chwedeńczuk, Jan ^a,b   Góral, Krzysztof ^a,c   Köhler, Thorsten ^a   Julienne, Paul S ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WARSAW   (Poland)

^c CENTER FOR THEORETICAL PHYSICS   (Poland)

^d NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BOSE-EINSTEIN CONDENSATES; DEGENERATION; FERMI GASES; MOLECULAR PRODUCTION; ZEEMAN LEVELS;

APPROXIMATION THEORY; BINDING ENERGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CORRELATION METHODS; DENSITY (SPECIFIC GRAVITY); FERMIONS; MAGNETIC FIELD EFFECTS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PROBABILITY; QUANTUM THEORY; RESONANCE; SCATTERING;

FERMI LEVEL;

EID: 42749107263     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: 10797114     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.260403     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. E. A. Donley et al., Nature (London) 417, 529 (2002).
2. N. R. Claussen et al., Phys. Rev. A 67, 060701 (2003).
3. C. A. Regal et al., Nature (London) 424, 47 (2003).
4. J. Herbig et al., Science 301, 1510 (2003).
5. S. Dürr et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 020406 (2004).
6. K. E. Strecker, G. B. Partridge, and R. G. Hulet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 080406 (2003).
7. J. Cubizolles et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 240401 (2003).
8. S. Jochim et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 240402 (2003).
9. K. Xu et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 210402 (2003).
10. M. Greiner, C. A. Regal, and D. S. Jin, Nature (London) 426, 537 (2003).
11. J. Javanainen et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 200402 (2004).
12. E. Pazy, A. Vardi, and Y. B. Band, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 120409 (2004).
13. I. Tikhonenkov and A. Vardi, cond-mat/0407424.
14. J. E. Williams et al., J. Phys. B 37, L351 (2004).
15. F. H. Mies, E. Tiesinga, and P. S. Julienne, Phys. Rev. A 61, 022721 (2000).
16. K. Góral et al., J. Phys. B 37, 3457 (2004).
17. The probability for a transition from a continuum state to the molecular bound state is the same as the transition probability for the time reversed process of molecular dissociation. The probabilities for molecular dissociation into continuum states were determined in Ref. [16] and by Mukaiyama et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 180402 (2004)], and are well confirmed experimentally [cf., also, S. Dürr et al., Phys. Rev. A 70, 031601 (2004)].
18. The probability for a transition from a continuum state to the molecular bound state is the same as the transition probability for the time reversed process of molecular dissociation. The probabilities for molecular dissociation into continuum states were determined in Ref. [16] and by Mukaiyama et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 180402 (2004)], and are well confirmed experimentally [cf., also, S. Dürr et al., Phys. Rev. A 70, 031601 (2004)].
19. K. Góral, T. Köhler, and K. Burnett, cond-mat/0407627 [Phys. Rev. A (to be published)].
20. S. Jochim et al., Science 302, 2101 (2003).
21. M. W. Zwierlein et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 250401 (2003).
22. D. A. Butts and D. S. Rokhsar, Phys. Rev. A 55, 4346 (1997).
23. C. A. Regal and D. S. Jin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 230404 (2003).
24. C. Regal (private communication).