Volume integral theorem for exotic matter

Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology

Volumn 70, Issue 12, 2004, Pages

  Nandi, Kamal Kanti ^a,c   Zhang, Yuan Zhong ^b,c   Kumar, K B Vijaya ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH BENGAL   (India)

^b CCAST WORLD LABORATORY   (China)

^c INSTITUTE OF THEORETICAL PHYSICS   (China)

^d MANGALORE UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ENERGY; KINETICS; MATHEMATICS; SPACE;

EID: 42749106925     PISSN: 05562821     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.70.127503     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. S. Perlmutter, M. S. Turner, and M. White, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 670 (1999); I. Zlatev, L. Wang, and P. J. Steinhardt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 896 (1999); C. Armendáriz-Picón, V. Mukhanov, and P. J. Steinhardt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4438 (2000); S. Dodelson, M. Kaplinghat, and E. Stewart, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 5276 (2000).
2. S. Perlmutter, M. S. Turner, and M. White, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 670 (1999); I. Zlatev, L. Wang, and P. J. Steinhardt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 896 (1999); C. Armendáriz-Picón, V. Mukhanov, and P. J. Steinhardt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4438 (2000); S. Dodelson, M. Kaplinghat, and E. Stewart, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 5276 (2000).
3. S. Perlmutter, M. S. Turner, and M. White, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 670 (1999); I. Zlatev, L. Wang, and P. J. Steinhardt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 896 (1999); C. Armendáriz-Picón, V. Mukhanov, and P. J. Steinhardt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4438 (2000); S. Dodelson, M. Kaplinghat, and E. Stewart, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 5276 (2000).
4. S. Perlmutter, M. S. Turner, and M. White, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 670 (1999); I. Zlatev, L. Wang, and P. J. Steinhardt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 896 (1999); C. Armendáriz-Picón, V. Mukhanov, and P. J. Steinhardt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4438 (2000); S. Dodelson, M. Kaplinghat, and E. Stewart, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 5276 (2000).
5. Matt Visser, Sayan Kar, and Naresh Dadhich, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 201102 (2003).
6. S. Kar, N. Dadhich, and M. Visser, Pramana 63, 859 (2004).
7. M. S. Morris and K. S. Thorne, Am. J. Phys. 56, 395 (1988); M. S. Morris, K. S. Thorne and U. Yurtsever, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 1446 (1988).
8. M. S. Morris and K. S. Thorne, Am. J. Phys. 56, 395 (1988); M. S. Morris, K. S. Thorne and U. Yurtsever, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 1446 (1988).
9. It is to be noted here that, in general, minimally coupled scalar field does not violate the NEC: See, for instance, C. Barceló and M. Visser, Phys. Lett. B 466, 127 (1999); Classical Quantum Gravity 17, 3843 (2000; More general results may be found in: K. A. Bronnikov, Phys. Rev. D 64, 064013 (2001); However, the scalar field with a negative kinetic energy has been discussed by H. G. Ellis, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 14, 104 (1973); 15, 520E (1974).
10. It is to be noted here that, in general, minimally coupled scalar field does not violate the NEC: See, for instance, C. Barceló and M. Visser, Phys. Lett. B 466, 127 (1999); Classical Quantum Gravity 17, 3843 (2000; More general results may be found in: K. A. Bronnikov, Phys. Rev. D 64, 064013 (2001); However, the scalar field with a negative kinetic energy has been discussed by H. G. Ellis, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 14, 104 (1973); 15, 520E (1974).
11. It is to be noted here that, in general, minimally coupled scalar field does not violate the NEC: See, for instance, C. Barceló and M. Visser, Phys. Lett. B 466, 127 (1999); Classical Quantum Gravity 17, 3843 (2000; More general results may be found in: K. A. Bronnikov, Phys. Rev. D 64, 064013 (2001); However, the scalar field with a negative kinetic energy has been discussed by H. G. Ellis, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 14, 104 (1973); 15, 520E (1974).
12. It is to be noted here that, in general, minimally coupled scalar field does not violate the NEC: See, for instance, C. Barceló and M. Visser, Phys. Lett. B 466, 127 (1999); Classical Quantum Gravity 17, 3843 (2000; More general results may be found in: K. A. Bronnikov, Phys. Rev. D 64, 064013 (2001); However, the scalar field with a negative kinetic energy has been discussed by H. G. Ellis, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 14, 104 (1973); 15, 520E (1974).
13. It is to be noted here that, in general, minimally coupled scalar field does not violate the NEC: See, for instance, C. Barceló and M. Visser, Phys. Lett. B 466, 127 (1999); Classical Quantum Gravity 17, 3843 (2000; More general results may be found in: K. A. Bronnikov, Phys. Rev. D 64, 064013 (2001); However, the scalar field with a negative kinetic energy has been discussed by H. G. Ellis, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 14, 104 (1973); 15, 520E (1974).
14. Mark A. Scheel, Stuart L. Shapiro, and Saul A. Teukolsky, Phys. Rev. D 51, 4208 (1995); 51, 4236 (1995).
15. Mark A. Scheel, Stuart L. Shapiro, and Saul A. Teukolsky, Phys. Rev. D 51, 4208 (1995); 51, 4236 (1995).
16. Huseyin Yilmaz, Phys. Rev. 111, 1417 (1958).
17. M. Visser, Lorentzian Wormholes-From Einstein to Hawking, (AIP, Woodbury, 1995), p. 150.
18. K. K. Nandi, Yuan-Zhong Zhang, and K. B. Vijaya Kumar, Phys. Rev. D 70, 064018 (2004); K. K. Nandi and Yuan-Zhong Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 70, 044040 (2004).
19. K. K. Nandi, Yuan-Zhong Zhang, and K. B. Vijaya Kumar, Phys. Rev. D 70, 064018 (2004); K. K. Nandi and Yuan-Zhong Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 70, 044040 (2004).
20. H. A. Buchdahl, Phys. Rev. 115, 1325 (1959).
21. K. K. Nandi, A. Islam, and J. Evans, Phys. Rev. D 55, 2497 (1997); K. K. Nandi, B. Bhattacharjee, S. M. K. Alam, and J. Evans, Phys. Rev. D 57, 823 (1998).
22. K. K. Nandi, A. Islam, and J. Evans, Phys. Rev. D 55, 2497 (1997); K. K. Nandi, B. Bhattacharjee, S. M. K. Alam, and J. Evans, Phys. Rev. D 57, 823 (1998).
23. N. Dadhich, S. Kar, S. Mukherjee, and M. Visser, Phys. Rev. D 65, 064004 (2002).
24. ANEC = 0, that does not rely on specific geometries, but relies only on the general wormhole behavior of φ and b.