Nearly deterministic linear optical controlled-NOT gate

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 93, Issue 25, 2004, Pages

  Nemoto, Kae ^a   Munro, W J ^a,b  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF INFORMATICS   (Japan)

^b HEWLETT PACKARD LABORATORIES   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COHERENT PROBE; ELECTROMAGNETICALLY INDUCED TRANSPARENCY (EIT); LINEAR OPTICS; SINGLE PHOTONS SOURCES;

DETECTORS; ERROR ANALYSIS; HAMILTONIANS; MEASUREMENT THEORY; NONLINEAR SYSTEMS; PHASE SHIFT; POLARIZATION; PROBABILITY;

PHOTONS;

EID: 42749106385     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.250502     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. E. Knill, R. Laflamme, and G. Milburn, Nature (London) 409, 46 (2001).
2. T.B. Pittman et al., Phys. Rev. A 64, 062311 (2001).
3. E. Knill, Phys. Rev. A 66, 052306 (2002).
4. E. Knill, Phys. Rev. A 68, 064303 (2003).
5. M. A. Nielsen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 040503 (2004).
6. D. E. Browne and T. Rudolph, quant-ph/0405157.
7. T.B. Pittman et al., Phys. Rev. A 68, 032316 (2003).
8. J.L. O'Brien et al., Nature (London) 426, 264 (2003).
9. S. Gasparoni et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 020504 (2004).
10. E. Knill, quant-ph/0110144.
11. N. Voran and B. Reznik, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 037903 (2003).
12. T.C. Ralph et al., Phys. Rev. A 68, 042319 (2003).
13. G. J. Milburn and D. F. Walls, Phys. Rev. A 30, 56 (1984).
14. N. Imoto et al., Phys. Rev. A 32, 2287 (1985).
15. P. Grangier, J. A. Levenson, and J.-P. Poizat, Nature (London) 396, 537 (1998).
16. H. Schmidt and A. Imamoglu, Opt. Lett. 21, 1936 (1996).
17. W. J. Munro et al., quant-ph/0310066.
18. These results generalize to all the other linear logic CNOT gates.
19. S. D. Barrett et al., quant-ph/0408117.
20. There are feed-forward operations both in the entangling gate and the final measurement step. These can be delayed and performed together at the end of the gate.