Hybrid method for simulating front propagation in reaction-diffusion systems

Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics

Volumn 69, Issue 6 1, 2004, Pages

  Moro, Esteban ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD CARLOS III DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CORRELATION METHODS; DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; FLUID DYNAMICS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MICROSCOPIC EXAMINATION; PARTICLES (PARTICULATE MATTER); PERTURBATION TECHNIQUES; RELAXATION PROCESSES; VELOCITY MEASUREMENT;

FRONT PROPAGATIONS; HYBRID METHODS; MEAN FIELD APPROXIMATIONS; REACTION-DIFFUSION SYSTEMS;

DIFFUSION;

EID: 42749104562     PISSN: 15393755     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.69.060101     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. J. Koplik and J. R. Banavar, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 27, 257 (1995).
2. F. F. Abraham, J. Q. Broughton, N. Bernstein, and E. Kaxiras, Comput. Phys. 12, 538 (1998).
3. M. Plapp and A. Karma, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1740 (2000).
4. F. Alexander, A. L. Garcia, and B. J. Alder, Phys. Fluids 6, 3854 (1994) ; A. L. Garcia, J. B. Bell, W. Y. Crutchfield, and B. J. Alder, J. Comput. Phys. 154, 134 (1999).
5. F. Alexander, A. L. Garcia, and B. J. Alder, Phys. Fluids 6, 3854 (1994) ; A. L. Garcia, J. B. Bell, W. Y. Crutchfield, and B. J. Alder, J. Comput. Phys. 154, 134 (1999).
6. W. van Saarloos, Phys. Rep. 386, 29 (2003); U. Ebert and W. van Saarloos, Physica D 146, 1 (2000).
7. W. van Saarloos, Phys. Rep. 386, 29 (2003); U. Ebert and W. van Saarloos, Physica D 146, 1 (2000).
8. D. Panja, e-print cond-mat/0307363; Phys. Rev. E 68, 065202 (2003).
9. D. Panja, e-print cond-mat/0307363; Phys. Rev. E 68, 065202 (2003).
10. D. ben-Avraham and S. Havlin, Diffusion and Reactions in Fractals and Disordered Systems (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2000).
11. H. P. Breuer, W. Huber, and F. Petruccione, Physica D 73, 259 (1993); Europhys. Lett. 30, 69 (1995).
12. H. P. Breuer, W. Huber, and F. Petruccione, Physica D 73, 259 (1993); Europhys. Lett. 30, 69 (1995).
13. E. Moro, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 238303 (2001); Phys. Rev. E 68, 025102 (2003).
14. E. Moro, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 238303 (2001); Phys. Rev. E 68, 025102 (2003).
15. R. A. Fisher, Ann. Eugenics 7, 355 (1936); A. Kolmogorov, I. Petrovsky, and N. Piscounov, Mosc. Univ. Bull, Math. A 1, 1 (1937).
16. R. A. Fisher, Ann. Eugenics 7, 355 (1936); A. Kolmogorov, I. Petrovsky, and N. Piscounov, Mosc. Univ. Bull, Math. A 1, 1 (1937).
17. E. Brunet and B. Derrida, Phys. Rev. E 56, 2597 (1997); Comput. Phys. Commun. 122, 376 (1999).
18. E. Brunet and B. Derrida, Phys. Rev. E 56, 2597 (1997); Comput. Phys. Commun. 122, 376 (1999).
19. E. Brunet and B. Derrida, J. Stat. Phys. 103, 269 (2001).
20. D. A. Kessler, Z. Ner, and L. M. Sander, Phys. Rev. E 58, 107 (1998).
21. Strictly speaking, only fronts with τΩ∞ are pulled, while for finite and large τΩ they become weakly pushed; see [5].
22. A. Lemarchand and B. Nowakowski, J. Chem. Phys. 111, 6190 (1999); A. Lemarchand, J. Stat. Phys. 101, 579 (2000).
23. A. Lemarchand and B. Nowakowski, J. Chem. Phys. 111, 6190 (1999); A. Lemarchand, J. Stat. Phys. 101, 579 (2000).
24. F. J. Alexander, A. L. García, and D. M. Tartakovsky, J. Comput. Phys. 182, 47 (2002).
25. E. G. Flekkøy, J. Feder, and G. Wagner, Europhys. Lett. 52, 271 (2000); Phys. Rev. E 64, 066302 (2001).
26. E. G. Flekkøy, J. Feder, and G. Wagner, Europhys. Lett. 52, 271 (2000); Phys. Rev. E 64, 066302 (2001).
27. T. P. Schulze, P. Smereka, and W. E, J. Comput. Phys. 189, 197 (2003).
28. *)].
29. C. R. Doering, C. Mueller, and P. Smereka, Physica A 325, 243 (2003).
30. L. Pechenik and H. Levine, Phys. Rev. E 59, 3893 (1999).