메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 69, Issue 14, 2004, Pages

Distribution of exchange energy in a bond-alternating S = 1 quantum spin chain

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIAMINE DERIVATIVE; FERROMAGNETIC MATERIAL;

EID: 42749104352     PISSN: 01631829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.69.144417     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (21)

References (48)
  • 17
    • 0037128011 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A. Zheludev, Z. Honda, Y. Chan, C. Broholm and K. Katsumata, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 077206 (2002); A. Zheludev, Z. Honda, C. Broholm, K. Katsumata, S.M. Shapiro, and A. Kolezhuk, cond-mat/0301424 (unpublished), and references therein.
    • (2002) Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol.88 , pp. 077206
    • Zheludev, A.1    Honda, Z.2    Chan, Y.3    Broholm, C.4    Katsumata, K.5
  • 18
    • 0037128011 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • cond-mat/0301424 (unpublished), and references therein
    • A. Zheludev, Z. Honda, Y. Chan, C. Broholm and K. Katsumata, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 077206 (2002); A. Zheludev, Z. Honda, C. Broholm, K. Katsumata, S.M. Shapiro, and A. Kolezhuk, cond-mat/0301424 (unpublished), and references therein.
    • Zheludev, A.1    Honda, Z.2    Broholm, C.3    Katsumata, K.4    Shapiro, S.M.5    Kolezhuk, A.6
  • 20
    • 33646665410 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • note
    • 2)/2.
  • 21
  • 26
    • 33646671027 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • cond-mat/0309178 (unpublished)
    • T. Suzuki and S. Suga, cond-mat/0309178 (unpublished).
    • Suzuki, T.1    Suga, S.2
  • 43
    • 0003808791 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • edited by I. Peschel, X. Wang, M. Kaulke, and K. Hallberg (Springer-Verlag, Berlin)
    • For a review see, e.g., Density-Matrix Renormalization Group, edited by I. Peschel, X. Wang, M. Kaulke, and K. Hallberg (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1999).
    • (1999) Density-Matrix Renormalization Group
  • 48
    • 33646643545 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • note
    • Note the discrepancy with Ref. 14, where the authors seemingly fail to distinguish between D and D̃. In any case, their quoted estimate (D/J=0.35 using the symmetric definition of J) is hard to reconcile with the very small anisotropy of critical field and gap energies that the authors report and that our neutron-scattering experiments confirm. We believe that the discrepancy is due to inconsistent notations or a trivial mistake in Ref. 14.


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.