Reproducible sequence generation in random neural ensembles

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 93, Issue 23, 2004, Pages

  Huerta, Ramón ^a,b   Rabinovich, Mikhail ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENETIC CODES; LEARNING PHASES; MOTOR CONTROL; NEURONS;

DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NETWORKS (CIRCUITS); NEURAL NETWORKS; PERTURBATION TECHNIQUES; PROBABILITY; ROBUSTNESS (CONTROL SYSTEMS);

NEUROLOGY;

ACTION POTENTIAL; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOPHYSICS; BRAIN; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; NERVE CELL; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; PHYSIOLOGY; STATISTICAL MODEL; SYNAPTIC TRANSMISSION; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ANIMALS; BIOPHYSICS; BRAIN; HUMANS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MODELS, THEORETICAL; NERVE NET; NEURONAL PLASTICITY; NEURONS; SYNAPTIC TRANSMISSION;

EID: 42749104029     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.238104     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. G. Laurent et al. Anna Rev. Neurosci. 24, 263 (2001).
2. R. H. R. Hahnloser et al., Nature (London) 419 65 (2002).
3. A. Selverston, Prog. Brain Res. 123, 247 (1999); O. Melamed et al. Trends Neurosci. 27, 11 (2004); J. W. Aldridge and K. C. Berridge J. Neurosci. 18, 2777 (1998).
4. A. Selverston, Prog. Brain Res. 123, 247 (1999); O. Melamed et al. Trends Neurosci. 27, 11 (2004); J. W. Aldridge and K. C. Berridge J. Neurosci. 18, 2777 (1998).
5. A. Selverston, Prog. Brain Res. 123, 247 (1999); O. Melamed et al. Trends Neurosci. 27, 11 (2004); J. W. Aldridge and K. C. Berridge J. Neurosci. 18, 2777 (1998).
6. W. Maass et al. Neural Comput. 14, 2531 (2002); H. Jaeger and H. Haas, Science 304, 78 (2004).
7. W. Maass et al. Neural Comput. 14, 2531 (2002); H. Jaeger and H. Haas, Science 304, 78 (2004).
8. H. R. Wilson and J. D. Cowan, Kybernetik 13, 55 (1973).In the model we analyze here we set the refractory periods to 0. Therefore, the rising and decay time constants of the model are identical.
9. C. van Vreeswijk and H. Sompolinsky, Neural Comput. 10, 1321 (1988).
10. N. Bertschinger and T. Natschlager, Neural Comput. 16, 1413 (2004).
11. B. Derrida and Y Pomeau, Europhys. Lett. 1, 45 (1986).
12. The activity distribution is actually bimodal because there is always a peak in the absorbing state. The results that we analyze in the simulations are obtained without counting the absorbing states.
13. L. Glass, J. Chem. Phys. 63, 1325 (1975); L. Glass and J. Pasternack, J. Math. Biol. 6, 207 (1978).
14. L. Glass, J. Chem. Phys. 63, 1325 (1975); L. Glass and J. Pasternack, J. Math. Biol. 6, 207 (1978).
15. S. A. Kauffman, The Origins of Order: Self-Organization in Evolution (Oxford University Press, New York, 1993).
16. M. Rabinovich et al. Phys. Rev. Lett., 87, 068102 (2001).